Agreed. I am one of the PPs who argued that doctors should push dietary changes, not drugs. I for one am not arguing that doctors should tell people to eat less. I am arguing that they should tell people to eat differently. |
When you body is carrying less fat though it will be less hungry. |
Not PP, but you can't really choose not to go to the doctor. My PCP practice drops you and returns you to new patient status if you aren't seen in 3 years. And since we don't have universal care here in the US, we don't have universal medical records, and at some point, older patient records are destroyed. And we will never have universal care in this country until the majority of voters AND DOCTORS get on board with it. I appreciate the position by an earlier poster that doctors don't make their money from pharma companies. But the medical LOBBY and the pharmaceutical LOBBY are one and the same. |
Sure. Doctors and hospitals aren’t at all interested in the extra profits of astronomical C-section rates. Lol. |
Different poster. Obs get sued right and left. That truly is the number 1 issue driving C sections. |
No, they are absolutely not one and the same. You are operating on faulty information. |
Actually they would make vastly more money by paying lower malpractice insurance and defending fewer cases. Those costs savings are far greater than whatever incremental increase they would get by billing an unnecessary c-section. It is really pathetic how deeply entrenched you are in your victim mentality and conspiracy thinking. You are wrong and can’t accept it. |
|
The rise in Concierge models of practice has not helped patients' views of doctors in this area.
They literally want us to pay a retainer to be their patients. We have to start paying them extra fees to send our prescriptions into pharmacies for example, or to get a call returned. These are all things that physicians thought was a cost of doing medicine up to now (not OUR cost). They are running a business, and are trying to pass the cost of running that business on to us. And please don't tell me how much time is taken up by dealing with insurance companies. My provider will have nothing to do with them. That is all on me. Even though I now have to pay HER an administrative fee. |
This is wealthy area where people demand top quality service and a ton of hand holding even over extraneous things. Just look at this thread. Entitled people who treat doctors like a retail sales purchase. None of these people bat an eye at paying their lawyer by the hour for every phonecall, email and photocopy. You may not have any idea how much time doctors spend working on patient care outside of direct face to face appointments but it is A LOT, even before dealing with insurance companies for prior authorizations (which takes even more time). Folks here are probably willing to pay for first class airline tickets and airport lounges and baggage fees and buying snacks on planes and TSA pre check—things that previously were included in the airfare. They are just accustomed to treating doctors like their personal servants, or their nanny. |
Sorry that your patients are human and not robots. It is hard to sincerely help people if you see them as "weak, indulgent and confused." Good doctors find ways to help the people who walk into their offices. It does not take much skill to keep perfect patients healthy. |
|
Interesting that this was your takeaway. You don't seem very bright (or empathetic). |
Stop blaming people who probably pay $1500 a month on healthcare premiums only to shell out hundreds more out of pocket. The insurance companies are the problem - not the patients. Good grief you are not understanding the point at all. Doctors dismissing patients because they are in a rush is wrong. Stop trying to justify it. |
| You seem to be the one blaming doctors and not insurance companies. It is the insurers driving all of this, and the management of health care companies and private equity buying private practices. It’s not doctors driving it. |
Wow. Delusional. |