That’s fine. But everyone I know who can’t or hasn’t bought a home goes on a good number of vacations, has an iPhone and spends money on other things that are a waste. They are unwilling to make short term sacrifices for a longer term gain. They think the $200 monthly cable bill isn’t much but don’t realize it’s everything together that adds up to a meaningful amount of money. They are too good for cutting cable, skipping out on a guys trip etc. |
I'm sure they don't "cut" coupons either, and they get takeout and go out for dinner too, because that's what everyone does. |
| What’s with the focus on iPhones? I mean, I agree you need to make smart financial choices/make sacrifices to be able to afford a home but iPhones are getting mentioned as a signal of frivolous spending to a bit of an amusing degree. |
+1 This is exactly the problem. Expensive education in a low-paying field + prestigious nonprofit job is for trust funds kids. She chose to fund her ego instead of buying a home but thinks she's too good to move to Manassas or Hyattsville. |
$550K can buy you a nice house IN the city: https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/5062-Central-Ave-SE-20019/home/17959742 |
Agree. Those iPhones and avocado toast are what’s preventing regular-salaried people from buying a $600,000 fixer upper. /s Not one person has mentioned how the cost of housing has increased at an extraordinarily higher rate than incomes have increased. All those 60-70s ranch houses in the suburbs were originally bought by single earner household government employees, retired officers, and accountants but now you need two six figure earners with a $300,00 down payment to buy it in its untouched-since-1965 state. Nothing to see here folks, everything is fine. |
Like it or not, the reason housing prices have increased is because women entered the workforce in larger numbers with higher salaries. This coincided with a time when boomers put demand on the housing supply and the higher incomes allowed prices to increase. Too late to turn back the clocks to the 1950s when a GS 13 could live large in Arlington |
+1 This has been the case for a long time. |
Am I the only one that cringes every time I see this trope? Unless you are the CEO of United Way, your nonprofit job is almost certainly NOT prestigious. |
the conundrum is the best paying jobs are in cities that are high cost. |
Nice?
|
You are not alone! |
There is some truth to this and there are also now some systemic barriers to wealth building that Gen X and Boomers didn't face. |
Haha I worked at a trade association and my job was not prestigious at all. But it was actually quite well paid for the hours (I only worked 35 a week officially and probably more like 30 unofficially and was paid the same as in the private sector, where I worked way more). |
OH MY GOD this is the truest, most definitive post I have ever read on DCUM. |