If this is the case at all of the high schools, why do they still have both on-level and honors English 9, 10, 11, and 12 courses listed in the bulletin? |
|
I don't think the curriculum has been changed significantly, I just think there is a lot more "for completion" grading, peer feedback exercises rather than teachers reviewing assignments, and very little teacher feedback on writing assignments.
My English teachers in HS marked every grammar mistake in a paper (short or long) and you lost a .5 of a point for each mistake. They also provided feedback about structure and content. |
What does URM mean? |
If you are old enough to have grammar mistakes marked, then the curriculum has changed dramatically since then. |
"Under Represented Minorities". |
which schools? |
The MCPS high school course bulletin. http://coursebulletin.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/publications/HSCourseBulletin2024.pdf |
| It just means they are too lazy to update the bulletin. |
This |
| Is there any organized effort to push back at this among parents? |
You have to look at each individual HS website for the school course bulletin. This course bulletin you have linked to is just a comprehensive list of "approved" courses that a school could offer. I don't know why MCPS doesn't provide a centralized place to look at which HS's actually offer a course. My cynical view is that it would be too easy for parent's to compare information, organize, and complain. |
But isn't that the question: since we can see that MCPS has approved on-level English as a course a school could offer, why are apparently none of the schools offering it? And are they being told they cannot offer an MCPS-approved course? On what grounds? |
dp.. IDK, but I know that my kids' HS doesn't offer non-honors English. Maybe someone here can tell us if there is a HS that does offer it. |
My guess is that no one wants to publicly admit that their child w/o SN can’t handle Honors English. |
more back door private recruiting!
|