Help me decide- Frumin vs. Duncan

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will be voting for Finley over Frumin. Something about Frumin and all of his weird supporters rubs me the wrong way. i think Finley has a good chance.

Frumin should change his slogan to "Ready for Frumin" because the refrain these past few weeks has been "even if he has no specifics and decades' old experience, only Frumin can save us from Goulet!" His cult has done a good job of scaring the other candidates out and convincing people that a vote for anyone but Frumin is a vote for Goulet. Only a vote for Goulet is a vote for Goulet. Also, the demonization of Goulet by Bergman et. al. is really gross.

It wasn't Frumin scaring people out of the race. Elissa Silverman conducted a poll and then got Duncan and Bergmann to bow out. She clearly saw their races as non-competitive and Frumin in the lead otherwise to Goulet.

That is how much of a threat Goulet is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will be voting for Finley over Frumin. Something about Frumin and all of his weird supporters rubs me the wrong way. i think Finley has a good chance.

Frumin should change his slogan to "Ready for Frumin" because the refrain these past few weeks has been "even if he has no specifics and decades' old experience, only Frumin can save us from Goulet!" His cult has done a good job of scaring the other candidates out and convincing people that a vote for anyone but Frumin is a vote for Goulet. Only a vote for Goulet is a vote for Goulet. Also, the demonization of Goulet by Bergman et. al. is really gross.

It wasn't Frumin scaring people out of the race. Elissa Silverman conducted a poll and then got Duncan and Bergmann to bow out. She clearly saw their races as non-competitive and Frumin in the lead otherwise to Goulet.

That is how much of a threat Goulet is.

It's not that Goulet himself is a threat, Eric seems like a decent (if a little strange) person. It's that having a ward councilmember who owes more to actors not just outside the ward but outside the city is going to be a disaster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will be voting for Finley over Frumin. Something about Frumin

and all of his weird supporters rubs me the wrong way. i think Finley has a good chance.

Frumin should change his slogan to "Ready for Frumin" because the refrain these past few weeks has been "even if he has no specifics and decades' old experience, only Frumin can save us from Goulet!" His cult has done a good job of scaring the other candidates out and convincing people that a vote for anyone but Frumin is a vote for Goulet. Only a vote for Goulet is a vote for Goulet. Also, the demonization of Goulet by Bergman et. al. is really gross.

It wasn't Frumin scaring people out of the race. Elissa Silverman conducted a poll and then got Duncan and Bergmann to bow out. She clearly saw their races as non-competitive and Frumin in the lead otherwise to Goulet.

That is how much of a threat Goulet is.

It's not that Goulet himself is a threat, Eric seems like a decent (if a little strange) person. It's that having a ward councilmember who owes more to actors not just outside the ward but outside the city is going to be a disaster.

I lived in Ward 2 for many years when Jack Evans was councilmember. Eric Goulet is going to end exactly the same way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will be voting for Finley over Frumin. Something about Frumin and all of his weird supporters rubs me the wrong way. i think Finley has a good chance.

Frumin should change his slogan to "Ready for Frumin" because the refrain these past few weeks has been "even if he has no specifics and decades' old experience, only Frumin can save us from Goulet!" His cult has done a good job of scaring the other candidates out and convincing people that a vote for anyone but Frumin is a vote for Goulet. Only a vote for Goulet is a vote for Goulet. Also, the demonization of Goulet by Bergman et. al. is really gross.

It wasn't Frumin scaring people out of the race. Elissa Silverman conducted a poll and then got Duncan and Bergmann to bow out. She clearly saw their races as non-competitive and Frumin in the lead otherwise to Goulet.

That is how much of a threat Goulet is.

It's not that Goulet himself is a threat, Eric seems like a decent (if a little strange) person. It's that having a ward councilmember who owes more to actors not just outside the ward but outside the city is going to be a disaster.

I’d still like to know what these actors want. Quite frankly, it would serve Goulet to de-mystify and say it’s for clean streets, more cops, less crime, more flowers, I don’t really care but I’d like to know. Everyone is beholden to certain interests and I’m scared the most of those beholden to their own self-interest like getting that next term and will then pander and pander and never stand up for anything

[Anonymous]

Also was he ever close to the corruption thingy that felled Gray?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will be voting for Finley over Frumin. Something about Frumin and all of his weird supporters rubs me the wrong way. i think Finley has a good chance.

Frumin should change his slogan to "Ready for Frumin" because the refrain these past few weeks has been "even if he has no specifics and decades' old experience, only Frumin can save us from Goulet!" His cult has done a good job of scaring the other candidates out and convincing people that a vote for anyone but Frumin is a vote for Goulet. Only a vote for Goulet is a vote for Goulet. Also, the demonization of Goulet by Bergman et. al. is really gross.

It wasn't Frumin scaring people out of the race. Elissa Silverman conducted a poll and then got Duncan and Bergmann to bow out. She clearly saw their races as non-competitive and Frumin in the lead otherwise to Goulet.

That is how much of a threat Goulet is.

It's not that Goulet himself is a threat, Eric seems like a decent (if a little strange) person. It's that having a ward councilmember who owes more to actors not just outside the ward but outside the city is going to be a disaster.

I’d still like to know what these actors want. Quite frankly, it would serve Goulet to de-mystify and say it’s for clean streets, more cops, less crime, more flowers, I don’t really care but I’d like to know. Everyone is beholden to certain interests and I’m scared the most of those beholden to their own self-interest like getting that next term and will then pander and pander and never stand up for anything

the goal is to undermine public education so the electorate is dumb. it is obviously a little different in DC than elsewhere, but ultimately, that is the goal of the right wing billionaires

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will be voting for Finley over Frumin. Something about Frumin and all of his weird supporters rubs me the wrong way. i think Finley has a good chance.

Frumin should change his slogan to "Ready for Frumin" because the refrain these past few weeks has been "even if he has no specifics and decades' old experience, only Frumin can save us from Goulet!" His cult has done a good job of scaring the other candidates out and convincing people that a vote for anyone but Frumin is a vote for Goulet. Only a vote for Goulet is a vote for Goulet. Also, the demonization of Goulet by Bergman et. al. is really gross.

It wasn't Frumin scaring people out of the race. Elissa Silverman conducted a poll and then got Duncan and Bergmann to bow out. She clearly saw their races as non-competitive and Frumin in the lead otherwise to Goulet.

That is how much of a threat Goulet is.

It's not that Goulet himself is a threat, Eric seems like a decent (if a little strange) person. It's that having a ward councilmember who owes more to actors not just outside the ward but outside the city is going to be a disaster.

I’d still like to know what these actors want. Quite frankly, it would serve Goulet to de-mystify and say it’s for clean streets, more cops, less crime, more flowers, I don’t really care but I’d like to know. Everyone is beholden to certain interests and I’m scared the most of those beholden to their own self-interest like getting that next term and will then pander and pander and never stand up for anything

Why would he be honest about it?

One of the charter school lobby groups paid for a Goulet mailer on affordable housing. Kind of outside their lane, don't you think?

If you followed the mini-scandal of DFER illegally sharing their polling data with Goulet, one of the things they shared was how different messages poll. So Goulet was able to create a platform tailored to positions that poll well. Since he absolutely no record of public service in the ward there was no danger of being caught contradicting previous positions.