The Catholic Church wants to oppress half the population. They don’t care that women will die as a result of their actions. Like the PP said, it has NO right to force those views on others. Can you address the actual issue here instead your idiotic condom red herring? Why do you want to oppress and hurt women? |
What a load of bullshit. |
No. Not at all. |
Why? This is a view that was widely held immediately post-Roe and during the decades since then. |
Yes. You have issue with laws that protect you with regards to healthcare? You must not like the laws that protect you and others. |
are you honestly trying to argue that reproductive rights are not being limited? ok. |
Uh, no. You are not allowed to use morals from your religion to create legislation. Are you insane? |
You are twisting what PP said. |
No, I'm not. PP is trying to word salad his way around saying it's ok to make laws from your personal religious ideologies. |
No it’s not. This is a distraction point to undermine women’s healthcare. |
You live in Lala land if you think that laws don’t come from morals with regard to aspects of religion. |
np then you shouldn't have an abortion. but, MYOB for other women and their families |
Again, read the title. |
It is not a distraction point. It goes to whether Roe has a solid constitutional underpinning or not and, if not, was the Supreme Court going beyond its remit of determining the constitutionality of a law by making policy instead. You may not care about the separation of powers, but it is the bedrock of our government. |
Obviously corrupt legislators do this, but that doesn't make it ethical and in line with the Constitution. But apparently there are individuals who can't fathom a cultivation of morality without god/religion. |