Breaking: Debbie Wasserman-Schulz' IT staffer arrested while trying to flee US

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I know that he was hired in 2004, and the bankruptcy filing was in 2012.

You do know that background checks must be redone from time to time? None of them are permanent. And, still, please explain why DWS kept Awan on her payroll after she was warned.

That's for security clearances, not regular employment check.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I know that he was hired in 2004, and the bankruptcy filing was in 2012.

You do know that background checks must be redone from time to time? None of them are permanent. And, still, please explain why DWS kept Awan on her payroll after she was warned.

That's for security clearances, not regular employment check.

You mean they did NO background check and NO security clearance for people who had access to extremely sensitive information? "Wow. One of them was on the Intelligence Committee. Scary that they are that casual.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I know that he was hired in 2004, and the bankruptcy filing was in 2012.

You do know that background checks must be redone from time to time? None of them are permanent. And, still, please explain why DWS kept Awan on her payroll after she was warned.

That's for security clearances, not regular employment check.

You mean they did NO background check and NO security clearance for people who had access to extremely sensitive information? "Wow. One of them was on the Intelligence Committee. Scary that they are that casual.

They keep extremely sensitive Intelligence Committee info on regular staff office computers? Doubtful.

[Anonymous]

Sorry I let the air out of this daily caller story. Learn from it. They use misdirection to deceive readers. It is their MO.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Luke Rosiak, the reporter who is closely following this story (and apparently the only one, really), was interviewed today. An excerpt:

“The House policy actually says that background checks are required, but if you delve into the fine print there’s technically a loophole that these members may have been able to invoke that essentially allowed another member just to vouch for them.”

“Before you turn over the passwords that give the guys access to all of the emails of the members of Congress and every file on their hard drives and all the staffers’ hard drives — they just kind of ask casually ask a friend, ask a fellow member of Congress and fill out this form — and turns out that all 44 members who employed Imran Awan, they never ran a background check.”

“If they would have run this background check it would have found out not only multiple criminal convictions, but $1 million bankruptcy, a dozen lawsuits … it would have found a whole host of major red flags and the Democrats didn’t do any of those checks,” Rosiak added. “As a result they gave these guys access access to everything and IG determined that they were funneling data off the House network.”

Rosiak said the entire scandal is becoming a Democratic cover up as investigators have been blocked from looking any deeper into the matter.

“There’s hundreds of thousands of dollars of equipment suspected to have been stolen and that’s basically what the IG started investigating and then it found that data was coming off the network too. And we don’t know exactly what the data was. We know that it had, quote, sensitive file names according to the IG. And the reason we don’t know more because the House actually blocked investigators from looking at some of the stuff,” Rosiak said. “This is a cover-up.”

“This is the biggest story that you never hear about,” he continued. “It’s a hack on the Congress by foreigners and the Democrats didn’t care about it, they didn’t stop it. These are the same people who were talking constantly about cyber breaches and Russia. And if you care about one, you’ve got to care about the other. So why haven’t they addressed it?”

Rosiak thinks Democrats are silent on the scandal because it would interfere with their Russian hacking narrative and affect their grasp on power.

“It basically destroys that Russian narrative just because it shows that they didn’t actually care about cyber-security and they haven’t responded to this. And thirdly, it could just be a question of, do these guys have something on members of Congress?” he concluded.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/04/02/imran-awan-hacking-scandal/

LOL at "destroying the Russian narrative" as the first sentencing from a guilty plea in the investigation investigation is set to happen tomorrow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Pakistani IT family that 44 Dems hired to handle technology issues never had background checks, despite the fact that they had access to members’ emails and other highly sensitive data.

Every one of the 44 House Democrats who hired Pakistan-born IT aides who later allegedly made “unauthorized access” to congressional data appears to have chosen to exempt them from background checks, according to congressional documents.

All of them appear to have waived background checks on Imran Awan and his family members, even though the family of server administrators could collectively read all the emails and files of 1 in 5 House Democrats, and despite background checks being recommended for such positions, according to an inspector general’s report. The House security policy requires offices to fill out a form attesting that they’ve initiated background checks, but it also includes a loophole allowing them to simply say that another member vouched for them.

Among the red flags in Abid’s background were a $1.1 million bankruptcy; six lawsuits against him or a company he owned; and at least three misdemeanor convictions including for DUI and driving on a suspended license, according to Virginia court records. Public court records show that Imran and Abid operated a car dealership referred to as CIA that took $100,000 from an Iraqi government official who is a fugitive from U.S. authorities. Numerous members of the family were tied to cryptic LLCs such as New Dawn 2001, operated out of Imran’s residence, Virginia corporation records show. Imran was the subject of repeated calls to police by multiple women and had multiple misdemeanor convictions for driving offenses, according to court records.

The Awans’ employers also included Rep. Yvette Clarke of New York, who saw $120,000 in computer equipment disappear under Abid Awan’s watch but “wrote off” the taxpayer funds rather than make an issue of it, according to the IG report and multiple senior government officials.

Xavier Becerra, now attorney general of California, ran the House Democratic Caucus, and his server was physically stolen shortly after the IG report named it as evidence in a hacking probe, three senior government officials said. A list of the members who did not conduct background checks is below.
If a screening had caught those, what officials say happened next might have been averted. The House inspector general reported on Sept. 20, 2016, that shortly before the election members of the group were logging into servers of members they didn’t work for, logging in using congressmen’s personal usernames, uploading data off the House network, and behaving in ways that suggested “nefarious purposes” and that “steps are being taken to conceal their activity.”

http://dailycaller.com/2018/04/01/democrats-pakistani-background-checks/?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=site-share

I bet you put a tickler on your calendar to revive this thread every couple months, lulz

[Anonymous]

So desparate to have a counter narrative to deflect from the real corruption that goes on in the trump administration every single day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://dailycaller.com/2018/04/01/democrats-pakistani-background-checks/

Links to other stories are in the article and listed below. Almost every story has specific documentation. There is a lot to this.

The guy first went to work for Robert Wexler. He is the one who should have done the background check, but since he is no longer in Congress, he is not part of the 44 members DC is going on about.

Naturally Daily Caller did not mention that they omitted the one person who should actually have done the background check. Liars figuring.

Why would you think that only the first guy should have done a background check? If I’m hiring a nanny, I’m not going to just assume the nanny’s last employer made sure her background check was okay. I’m also not going to hire more of the nanny’s relatives on the assumption that their backgrounds must be fine.

Responsible people do their due diligence. If you haven’t learned this yet in your life, you really should now.

Because it's the same employer. The better analogy is whether companies do new background checks when an employee moves to a different department.

But no one did the background checks! In your analogy, none of the departments would have done the background checks - not the first one, not the second one.

What is it going to take for you to understand that the background checks weren’t done? Seriously.

Actually the article did not say that. It said that none of the 44 current ones did. They conveniently left out former members, including the one who first hired him. This is how liars figure. They write a big long story with lots of detail but leave out the obvious, hoping you will not notice.

So you are just assuming that all of these people passed background checks? Despite the multiple DUIs, multiple 911 calls suggesting violence or intimidation, multiple lawsuits against them, sketchy payments from foreigners, and a bankruptcy filing? Why would you think that?

Do you have no concept of what the term “background check” means?

I know that he was hired in 2004, and the bankruptcy filing was in 2012.

Who’s “he”? We are talking about several people here. Would you also like to explain why the lawsuits, 911 calls and criminal convictions were no problem? Because they’d be a problem at most jobs in which sensitive government info is handled.

I really hope you’re never in a position to hire or employ anyone. You apparently have ridiculously low standards.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So desparate to have a counter narrative to deflect from the real corruption that goes on in the trump administration every single day.

Why are you okay with unauthorized accessing of confidential government documents?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So desparate to have a counter narrative to deflect from the real corruption that goes on in the trump administration every single day.

Why are you okay with unauthorized accessing of confidential government documents?

I'm not. Why are you? Stop trying to deflect from Trump's corruption. "Russia, if you're listening..."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So desparate to have a counter narrative to deflect from the real corruption that goes on in the trump administration every single day.

Why are you okay with unauthorized accessing of confidential government documents?

I'm not. Why are you? Stop trying to deflect from Trump's corruption. "Russia, if you're listening..."

So apparently it’s not ok when Russians do it, but it is ok when the Awans do it.

Dems are just ridiculous with the double standards. At some point, hopefully you realize you’re embarrassing yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So desparate to have a counter narrative to deflect from the real corruption that goes on in the trump administration every single day.

Why are you okay with unauthorized accessing of confidential government documents?

I'm not. Why are you? Stop trying to deflect from Trump's corruption. "Russia, if you're listening..."

So apparently it’s not ok when Russians do it, but it is ok when the Awans do it.

Dems are just ridiculous with the double standards. At some point, hopefully you realize you’re embarrassing yourself.

Didn't we arrest him? Oh yeah, we did. He's in jail, awaiting trial.

Now who has the double standard? Oh yeah, Republicans.

[Anonymous]

Didn't we arrest him? Oh yeah, we did. He's in jail, awaiting trial.

And, Wasserman-Schultz defended him--and, possibly, still does. And, she is fighting the Capitol Police over her laptop. Why?

[Anonymous]

Didn't we arrest him? Oh yeah, we did. He's in jail, awaiting trial.

Is he in jail? I thought he was out on bond.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So desparate to have a counter narrative to deflect from the real corruption that goes on in the trump administration every single day.

Why are you okay with unauthorized accessing of confidential government documents?

I'm not. Why are you? Stop trying to deflect from Trump's corruption. "Russia, if you're listening..."

So apparently it’s not ok when Russians do it, but it is ok when the Awans do it.

Dems are just ridiculous with the double standards. At some point, hopefully you realize you’re embarrassing yourself.

Didn't we arrest him? Oh yeah, we did. He's in jail, awaiting trial.

Now who has the double standard? Oh yeah, Republicans.

Arrested for mortgage fraud. And, the trial has been postponed numerous times. Many wonder why other charges, related to his involvement as an IT aide have not been forthcoming. Some believe it has everything to do with Xavier Becerra’s candidacy for attorney general of CA.

https://patch.com/california/orange-county/california-attorney-general-seeks-postpone-imran-trial

California Attorney General, Xavier Becerra, along with Debbie Wasserman Schultz, they initially hired the Awans' family to work as IT Techs for the House Intelligence Committee and in other sensitive government positions. Research shows that they (Imran's Family) were paid 4 times the pay scale for IT Techs with their background and training, they were also given money from Becerra's personal committee office; when the Capitol Police informed Becerra that they were conducting a criminal investigation into Imran and his family, Becerra interfered with the investigation by sending the Capitol Police an elaborate fake copy of the sever that he was informed to hand over. Debbie Wasserman Schultz was also televised nationwide, as she threatened the Capitol Police to return over her computer that Imran had left inside one of the Capitol building rooms, showing that he also had access to Debbie's computer codes, along with 80 other congressional members.

The postponing of the Imran criminal trial is a political move to help California Attorney General Xavier Becerra get elected and voted into office, says one source. The mainstream media news organizations are quiet about Becerra's criminal involvement with the Awan's scandal and interfering with a criminal investigation. There are literately millions of people in California that has no clue about who their Attorney General is, or his background. There is only one journalist, H.A. Goodman, who is actually writing and producing content about the Awan's scandal and Becerra's alleged involvement. H.A. Goodman is a writer, author, and credible columnist and you can find a lot of his videos about Seth Rich and Xavier Becerra on Youtube and other search engine platforms.