Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“DAN PUT THE ALLEGATION INTO THE CONGRESSIONAL RECORD.
Dan Goldman went to the House floor today and read a report- that was initially hidden by the DOJ- telling the story of Trump unzipping his pants, and forcing a 13-year-old to perform oral sex.”

And, it has been deemed "not credible" for years and years. Goldman should be ashamed. He knows this.

Many people are saying it’s credible. In fact, they come to me with tears in their eyes and say, sir…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“DAN PUT THE ALLEGATION INTO THE CONGRESSIONAL RECORD.
Dan Goldman went to the House floor today and read a report- that was initially hidden by the DOJ- telling the story of Trump unzipping his pants, and forcing a 13-year-old to perform oral sex.”

And, it has been deemed "not credible" for years and years. Goldman should be ashamed. He knows this.

Where’s your proof?

Citation?

Anything?

Go read the files. It is in there. The allegations came in 2019 and supposedly happened decades before. The woman also made other accusations that were deemed not credible. Goldman picked out the most ridiculous accusation in there to read on the floor--where he knows he is safe from prosecution.

Why ridiculous?

Trump has been accused of rape by multiple women, including his first wife.

He bragged about seeing young pageant contestants in stages of undress, and doing whatever he wanted to attractive women because he is famous.

None of that is in dispute.

[Anonymous]

Heather Cox Richardson
March 20, 2026

After yesterday’s revelation that the Department of Justice (DOJ) is blocking the release of a memo related to a Drug Enforcement Agency investigation into sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and 14 co-conspirators, Attorney General Pam Bondi added more evidence to the idea that the DOJ is engaged in covering up the relationship between members of the Trump administration, including President Donald J. Trump himself, and Epstein.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“DAN PUT THE ALLEGATION INTO THE CONGRESSIONAL RECORD.
Dan Goldman went to the House floor today and read a report- that was initially hidden by the DOJ- telling the story of Trump unzipping his pants, and forcing a 13-year-old to perform oral sex.”

And, it has been deemed "not credible" for years and years. Goldman should be ashamed. He knows this.

Where’s your proof?

Citation?

Anything?

Go read the files. It is in there. The allegations came in 2019 and supposedly happened decades before. The woman also made other accusations that were deemed not credible. Goldman picked out the most ridiculous accusation in there to read on the floor--where he knows he is safe from prosecution.

Trump can speak to it at his deposition on 2029.

I’d prefer that a journalist ask him directly, right now, on camera.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“DAN PUT THE ALLEGATION INTO THE CONGRESSIONAL RECORD.
Dan Goldman went to the House floor today and read a report- that was initially hidden by the DOJ- telling the story of Trump unzipping his pants, and forcing a 13-year-old to perform oral sex.”

And, it has been deemed "not credible" for years and years. Goldman should be ashamed. He knows this.

Where’s your proof?

Citation?

Anything?

Go read the files. It is in there. The allegations came in 2019 and supposedly happened decades before. The woman also made other accusations that were deemed not credible. Goldman picked out the most ridiculous accusation in there to read on the floor--where he knows he is safe from prosecution.

Trump can speak to it at his deposition on 2029.

Lol. He's not going to remember anything in 2029. He doesn't even remember anything now.

[Anonymous]

Apparently the Daily Mail didn’t think that Zampolli being a current Trump administration official - he’s the Special Envoy for Global Partnerships - wasn’t relevant enough to put in the headline?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“DAN PUT THE ALLEGATION INTO THE CONGRESSIONAL RECORD.
Dan Goldman went to the House floor today and read a report- that was initially hidden by the DOJ- telling the story of Trump unzipping his pants, and forcing a 13-year-old to perform oral sex.”

And, it has been deemed "not credible" for years and years. Goldman should be ashamed. He knows this.

Where’s your proof?

Citation?

Anything?

Go read the files. It is in there. The allegations came in 2019 and supposedly happened decades before. The woman also made other accusations that were deemed not credible. Goldman picked out the most ridiculous accusation in there to read on the floor--where he knows he is safe from prosecution.

If her accusations against Trump weren’t credible, why did Trump settle with her?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Apparently the Daily Mail didn’t think that Zampolli being a current Trump administration official - he’s the Special Envoy for Global Partnerships - wasn’t relevant enough to put in the headline?

Whoops it’s the New York Times FFS, not the Daily Mail. Even worse. Also, “Special Envoy for Global Partnerships” is quite a title for a what amounts to a former pimp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“DAN PUT THE ALLEGATION INTO THE CONGRESSIONAL RECORD.
Dan Goldman went to the House floor today and read a report- that was initially hidden by the DOJ- telling the story of Trump unzipping his pants, and forcing a 13-year-old to perform oral sex.”

And, it has been deemed "not credible" for years and years. Goldman should be ashamed. He knows this.

Where’s your proof?

Citation?

Anything?

Go read the files. It is in there. The allegations came in 2019 and supposedly happened decades before. The woman also made other accusations that were deemed not credible. Goldman picked out the most ridiculous accusation in there to read on the floor--where he knows he is safe from prosecution.

If her accusations against Trump weren’t credible, why did Trump settle with her?

BOOM! PP please come back to eat your crow.

Just utter depravity that MAGA hasn't ousted the pedophile felon. Guess they really are fine with it!

[Anonymous]

Elizabeth Warren-

“Multiple sources report that Trump’s Federal Reserve Chair nominee, Kevin Warsh, is included in the Epstein files.

It’s essential that the public fully understand the extent of any interactions or relationship he had with Jeffrey Epstein. I’m pushing for answers.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Elizabeth Warren-

“Multiple sources report that Trump’s Federal Reserve Chair nominee, Kevin Warsh, is included in the Epstein files.

It’s essential that the public fully understand the extent of any interactions or relationship he had with Jeffrey Epstein. I’m pushing for answers.”

It's like they're handing out jobs to the Epstein class to keep quiet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Elizabeth Warren-

“Multiple sources report that Trump’s Federal Reserve Chair nominee, Kevin Warsh, is included in the Epstein files.

It’s essential that the public fully understand the extent of any interactions or relationship he had with Jeffrey Epstein. I’m pushing for answers.”

It's like they're handing out jobs to the Epstein class to keep quiet.

I once read an article that explained SO much about Trump’s circle. It pointed out how many of his second-term hires have sexual assault or domestic violence charges, have been fired from their jobs, or similar. I just wrote that off as Trump having a sketchy circle of acquaintances and gravitating toward certain personalities, but the author pointed out that Trump values loyalty to himself above all else, and who’s more loyal than someone who almost blew up his life who you’re giving one last chance?

Not quite the same thing, but there’s a similar “let’s all just keep this in the family” logic to the Epstein circle.

[Anonymous]

Alumni of Pam Bondi’s Law School Threaten to Cut Off Donations If School Doesn’t Denounce Her Over Epstein Hearing

https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/alumni-of-pam-bondis-law-school-threaten-to-cut-off-donations-if-school-doesnt-denounce-her-over-epstein-hearing/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=threads

[Anonymous]

Melania was likely trafficked

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Heather Cox Richardson
March 20, 2026

After yesterday’s revelation that the Department of Justice (DOJ) is blocking the release of a memo related to a Drug Enforcement Agency investigation into sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and 14 co-conspirators, Attorney General Pam Bondi added more evidence to the idea that the DOJ is engaged in covering up the relationship between members of the Trump administration, including President Donald J. Trump himself, and Epstein.

Bondi must be covering up her deep ties to Epstein as well.