Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s just sad how much time some people put into taking down and hating women. Hope you enjoyed another weekend filled with that. 👍

No one hates other women more than BL. Sad but true.

Doesn’t seem correct in this case given that several of her actions in this case appeared to be motivated by a desire to protect other actresses on set, such a protecting the actress playing underage Lily from performing extra sex and simulating climaxing on camera for Baldoni (despite being unscripted) during the WGA strike where such unscripted acting would not be allowed, etc. (Also commenting afterwards, “I know I’m not supposed to say this, but that was so hot!” Ew ew ew.)

Seemed like excluding those unscripted scenes filmed ostensibly during the strike were a big part of why Lively wanted to edit the film. Wtf was up with Baldoni’s obsession with filming women climaxing on camera in his pg-13 movie, anyway?

Clearly you never saw when Harry met Sally.

On a more serious note, Are you the same poster who as so disgusted by the birth video? It seems you have a lot of issues with intimacy and female sexuality. Most women don’t consider either to be inherently gross or bad in the manner expressed in your posts.

When Harry Met Sally and Sinners are both rated R. Thanks for making my point.

My bigger point is this. Blake cries wolf on cue. She can’t hack it with the best directors and/or the best actresses out there who deliver on these roles.

I’ve never seen someone who constantly sexualizes comments in emails with co-workers and bosses, does the same in interviews, actively provokes the discussion, actively takes liberty in sexual provocativeness and innuendo in movies, and then says “gotcha”, it’s sexual harassment on benign ( an extra glance) or non-existent (birthing video) sexual claims.

I guarantee that most of Hollywood men will not ever want to work with her. Nor most Hollywood women for that matter. Maybe Salma and Jenny Slate. That’s about it.

You are choosing to skirt over the real problematic issues with Baldoni insisting on filming inappropriate sex scenes depicting underage characters for no good reason. Which you can neither explain nor excuse, so you just say “hey, look over there instead.”

That’s gross of you. Baldoni should not have done that but you hate her so much you’re excusing it and insisting that she wasn’t trying to fix a real problem your boy created.

That is extremely gross of you.

Isabella was 22 during filming. Not underage.

She was depicting a character who was underage, which is what I said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s just sad how much time some people put into taking down and hating women. Hope you enjoyed another weekend filled with that. 👍

No one hates other women more than BL. Sad but true.

Doesn’t seem correct in this case given that several of her actions in this case appeared to be motivated by a desire to protect other actresses on set, such a protecting the actress playing underage Lily from performing extra sex and simulating climaxing on camera for Baldoni (despite being unscripted) during the WGA strike where such unscripted acting would not be allowed, etc. (Also commenting afterwards, “I know I’m not supposed to say this, but that was so hot!” Ew ew ew.)

Seemed like excluding those unscripted scenes filmed ostensibly during the strike were a big part of why Lively wanted to edit the film. Wtf was up with Baldoni’s obsession with filming women climaxing on camera in his pg-13 movie, anyway?

Clearly you never saw when Harry met Sally.

On a more serious note, Are you the same poster who as so disgusted by the birth video? It seems you have a lot of issues with intimacy and female sexuality. Most women don’t consider either to be inherently gross or bad in the manner expressed in your posts.

When Harry Met Sally and Sinners are both rated R. Thanks for making my point.

My bigger point is this. Blake cries wolf on cue. She can’t hack it with the best directors and/or the best actresses out there who deliver on these roles.

I’ve never seen someone who constantly sexualizes comments in emails with co-workers and bosses, does the same in interviews, actively provokes the discussion, actively takes liberty in sexual provocativeness and innuendo in movies, and then says “gotcha”, it’s sexual harassment on benign ( an extra glance) or non-existent (birthing video) sexual claims.

I guarantee that most of Hollywood men will not ever want to work with her. Nor most Hollywood women for that matter. Maybe Salma and Jenny Slate. That’s about it.

You are choosing to skirt over the real problematic issues with Baldoni insisting on filming inappropriate sex scenes depicting underage characters for no good reason. Which you can neither explain nor excuse, so you just say “hey, look over there instead.”

That’s gross of you. Baldoni should not have done that but you hate her so much you’re excusing it and insisting that she wasn’t trying to fix a real problem your boy created.

That is extremely gross of you.

Who are you? A 15 year old? Who says this? It’s so “entitled”. The bottom line is that Blake is a fake.

Isabel had nothing but positive things to say about Baldoni’s directing on this film. No one complained about discomfort with Baldoni —just Blake, along with all of her other exaggerations.

Keep deflecting and failing to provide any good reason why Baldoni should insist on shooting unscripted sex, climaxing, and nudity that would by necessity need to wind up on the cutting room floor. (PS: this was Ferrer’s first film and she’s not in a real position to complain if she wants to work again, even if she’s George Clooney’s cousin/niece/whatever.). Your boy was harassing these women for no good reason except maybe his own weird power trip.

No one is responding to you because your allegations aren’t remotely tethered to reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s just sad how much time some people put into taking down and hating women. Hope you enjoyed another weekend filled with that. 👍

No one hates other women more than BL. Sad but true.

Doesn’t seem correct in this case given that several of her actions in this case appeared to be motivated by a desire to protect other actresses on set, such a protecting the actress playing underage Lily from performing extra sex and simulating climaxing on camera for Baldoni (despite being unscripted) during the WGA strike where such unscripted acting would not be allowed, etc. (Also commenting afterwards, “I know I’m not supposed to say this, but that was so hot!” Ew ew ew.)

Seemed like excluding those unscripted scenes filmed ostensibly during the strike were a big part of why Lively wanted to edit the film. Wtf was up with Baldoni’s obsession with filming women climaxing on camera in his pg-13 movie, anyway?

Clearly you never saw when Harry met Sally.

On a more serious note, Are you the same poster who as so disgusted by the birth video? It seems you have a lot of issues with intimacy and female sexuality. Most women don’t consider either to be inherently gross or bad in the manner expressed in your posts.

When Harry Met Sally and Sinners are both rated R. Thanks for making my point.

You didn’t answer my question and I didn’t bring up Sinners, that was a different poster. You are the same poster who was offended by the birth video, no? An attempt to film women enjoying sex is not inherently dirty or worthy of a R rating. You seem to be extremely uncomfortable with female nudity and sexuality.

lol, no, I’m no prude, I’m a realist. I am saying the movie was PG-13 and not R, and neither men nor women climax onscreen in PG-13 movies.

Baldoni is limited in what female sexuality and nudity he can show in his PG-13 movie. So insisting on filming climaxing and nudity that can never make it to the final cut (much less springing it on the actors and actresses without notice) is unprofessional of the director in charge, who should know better.

Don’t know how else I or the other poster can explain this in a way you can understand. You seem to have some sort of mental block about it.

You are the person with the mental block. You’ve repeatedly claimed female sexuality is gross or pornographic or creepy.

[Anonymous]

I find it interesting that none of Taylor’s good friends are friends with Blake. There was news over the weekend that Ice Spice unfollowed Blake, but Sabrina Carpenter doesn’t follow her but does follow Justin.

Jack Antonoff doesn’t follow Blake. Selena has long been warning Taylor about Blake and they were never friends.

Gigi was a mutual friend but reports are that she has cut ties with Blake.

Just interesting to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bottom line : no one was ‘offended’ at one of the hottest directors in Hollywood (and one of the hottest movie stars in Hollywood) on their sex scenes for the Sinners movie.

But you guys are offended that Baldoni, like Coogler, called for several sex scenes from several different actresses, and poor Blake thought they were in bad taste.

Tell that to Hailee Steinfeld and Michael B Jordan. Hailee will be happy to take on Blakes role in the next edition, regardless of who directs. Or a Jennifer Lawrence or a host of other actresses. Get Scarlett back! Shit she did that drama with Adam Driver!

There are so many other actresses that Baldoni can and should work with going forward.

Next

Do any of those actresses want to make a movie with Justin Baldoni? Even if he weren't involved in this lawsuit, I'm guessing the answer is no.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bottom line : no one was ‘offended’ at one of the hottest directors in Hollywood (and one of the hottest movie stars in Hollywood) on their sex scenes for the Sinners movie.

But you guys are offended that Baldoni, like Coogler, called for several sex scenes from several different actresses, and poor Blake thought they were in bad taste.

Tell that to Hailee Steinfeld and Michael B Jordan. Hailee will be happy to take on Blakes role in the next edition, regardless of who directs. Or a Jennifer Lawrence or a host of other actresses. Get Scarlett back! Shit she did that drama with Adam Driver!

There are so many other actresses that Baldoni can and should work with going forward.

Next

Do any of those actresses want to make a movie with Justin Baldoni? Even if he weren't involved in this lawsuit, I'm guessing the answer is no.

Why? Scarlett just did. Doesn’t get much bigger than her so confused as why you would say that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s just sad how much time some people put into taking down and hating women. Hope you enjoyed another weekend filled with that. 👍

No one hates other women more than BL. Sad but true.

Doesn’t seem correct in this case given that several of her actions in this case appeared to be motivated by a desire to protect other actresses on set, such a protecting the actress playing underage Lily from performing extra sex and simulating climaxing on camera for Baldoni (despite being unscripted) during the WGA strike where such unscripted acting would not be allowed, etc. (Also commenting afterwards, “I know I’m not supposed to say this, but that was so hot!” Ew ew ew.)

Seemed like excluding those unscripted scenes filmed ostensibly during the strike were a big part of why Lively wanted to edit the film. Wtf was up with Baldoni’s obsession with filming women climaxing on camera in his pg-13 movie, anyway?

Clearly you never saw when Harry met Sally.

On a more serious note, Are you the same poster who as so disgusted by the birth video? It seems you have a lot of issues with intimacy and female sexuality. Most women don’t consider either to be inherently gross or bad in the manner expressed in your posts.

When Harry Met Sally and Sinners are both rated R. Thanks for making my point.

You didn’t answer my question and I didn’t bring up Sinners, that was a different poster. You are the same poster who was offended by the birth video, no? An attempt to film women enjoying sex is not inherently dirty or worthy of a R rating. You seem to be extremely uncomfortable with female nudity and sexuality.

lol, no, I’m no prude, I’m a realist. I am saying the movie was PG-13 and not R, and neither men nor women climax onscreen in PG-13 movies.

Baldoni is limited in what female sexuality and nudity he can show in his PG-13 movie. So insisting on filming climaxing and nudity that can never make it to the final cut (much less springing it on the actors and actresses without notice) is unprofessional of the director in charge, who should know better.

Don’t know how else I or the other poster can explain this in a way you can understand. You seem to have some sort of mental block about it.

You are the person with the mental block. You’ve repeatedly claimed female sexuality is gross or pornographic or creepy.

wut? No. You guys are the worst. Keep deflecting like bots because you have no good response to the valid criticism.

[Anonymous]

I guarantee that an actress will sign up to do a movie with Baldoni (Scarlett) much quicker than any actor will sign on to do a movie with Blake. She can just forget about that going forward.

But again, nearly everyone is ready to move on to a favorable settlement for Baldoni or a jury trial at this point. No one but you cares about Blake or her narrative anymore.

Let’s focus on procedure, settlement and/or trial issues.

Did anyone see Scarlett on SNL Saturday? I saw a clip with her cute hubby giving her flowers and kissing her! I like her. Been following her movies for a bit. Cants wait for all of her summer movies—Eleanor (Baldoni film) and Jurassic Park stuff!

And look at Florence/-killing the MCU universe with those box office numbers!!

Margot is looking to team with Gosling for Oceans.

Too many exciting actors out there to want to spend any more time on Blake.

When is Taylor dropping her next album or tour?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s just sad how much time some people put into taking down and hating women. Hope you enjoyed another weekend filled with that. 👍

No one hates other women more than BL. Sad but true.

Doesn’t seem correct in this case given that several of her actions in this case appeared to be motivated by a desire to protect other actresses on set, such a protecting the actress playing underage Lily from performing extra sex and simulating climaxing on camera for Baldoni (despite being unscripted) during the WGA strike where such unscripted acting would not be allowed, etc. (Also commenting afterwards, “I know I’m not supposed to say this, but that was so hot!” Ew ew ew.)

Seemed like excluding those unscripted scenes filmed ostensibly during the strike were a big part of why Lively wanted to edit the film. Wtf was up with Baldoni’s obsession with filming women climaxing on camera in his pg-13 movie, anyway?

Clearly you never saw when Harry met Sally.

On a more serious note, Are you the same poster who as so disgusted by the birth video? It seems you have a lot of issues with intimacy and female sexuality. Most women don’t consider either to be inherently gross or bad in the manner expressed in your posts.

When Harry Met Sally and Sinners are both rated R. Thanks for making my point.

You didn’t answer my question and I didn’t bring up Sinners, that was a different poster. You are the same poster who was offended by the birth video, no? An attempt to film women enjoying sex is not inherently dirty or worthy of a R rating. You seem to be extremely uncomfortable with female nudity and sexuality.

lol, no, I’m no prude, I’m a realist. I am saying the movie was PG-13 and not R, and neither men nor women climax onscreen in PG-13 movies.

Baldoni is limited in what female sexuality and nudity he can show in his PG-13 movie. So insisting on filming climaxing and nudity that can never make it to the final cut (much less springing it on the actors and actresses without notice) is unprofessional of the director in charge, who should know better.

Don’t know how else I or the other poster can explain this in a way you can understand. You seem to have some sort of mental block about it.

DP. You keep going on and on about the PG-13 rating but movie ratings are assigned after filming. You literally don’t know what you’re talking about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bottom line : no one was ‘offended’ at one of the hottest directors in Hollywood (and one of the hottest movie stars in Hollywood) on their sex scenes for the Sinners movie.

But you guys are offended that Baldoni, like Coogler, called for several sex scenes from several different actresses, and poor Blake thought they were in bad taste.

Tell that to Hailee Steinfeld and Michael B Jordan. Hailee will be happy to take on Blakes role in the next edition, regardless of who directs. Or a Jennifer Lawrence or a host of other actresses. Get Scarlett back! Shit she did that drama with Adam Driver!

There are so many other actresses that Baldoni can and should work with going forward.

Next

Do any of those actresses want to make a movie with Justin Baldoni? Even if he weren't involved in this lawsuit, I'm guessing the answer is no.

Why? Scarlett just did. Doesn’t get much bigger than her so confused as why you would say that.

No I mean as a director. Was Justin on the set of that movie? No. And Scarlett directed and Justin was not directly involved. Wayfarer was the financing producer. There were several smaller production companies involved. Neither Justin nor Heath have a p.g.a. credit on the movie.

Scarlett is not going to make a movie with Justin Baldoni as the director. Not now, not ever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s just sad how much time some people put into taking down and hating women. Hope you enjoyed another weekend filled with that. 👍

No one hates other women more than BL. Sad but true.

Doesn’t seem correct in this case given that several of her actions in this case appeared to be motivated by a desire to protect other actresses on set, such a protecting the actress playing underage Lily from performing extra sex and simulating climaxing on camera for Baldoni (despite being unscripted) during the WGA strike where such unscripted acting would not be allowed, etc. (Also commenting afterwards, “I know I’m not supposed to say this, but that was so hot!” Ew ew ew.)

Seemed like excluding those unscripted scenes filmed ostensibly during the strike were a big part of why Lively wanted to edit the film. Wtf was up with Baldoni’s obsession with filming women climaxing on camera in his pg-13 movie, anyway?

Clearly you never saw when Harry met Sally.

On a more serious note, Are you the same poster who as so disgusted by the birth video? It seems you have a lot of issues with intimacy and female sexuality. Most women don’t consider either to be inherently gross or bad in the manner expressed in your posts.

When Harry Met Sally and Sinners are both rated R. Thanks for making my point.

You didn’t answer my question and I didn’t bring up Sinners, that was a different poster. You are the same poster who was offended by the birth video, no? An attempt to film women enjoying sex is not inherently dirty or worthy of a R rating. You seem to be extremely uncomfortable with female nudity and sexuality.

lol, no, I’m no prude, I’m a realist. I am saying the movie was PG-13 and not R, and neither men nor women climax onscreen in PG-13 movies.

Baldoni is limited in what female sexuality and nudity he can show in his PG-13 movie. So insisting on filming climaxing and nudity that can never make it to the final cut (much less springing it on the actors and actresses without notice) is unprofessional of the director in charge, who should know better.

Don’t know how else I or the other poster can explain this in a way you can understand. You seem to have some sort of mental block about it.

You are the person with the mental block. You’ve repeatedly claimed female sexuality is gross or pornographic or creepy.

wut? No. You guys are the worst. Keep deflecting like bots because you have no good response to the valid criticism.

You have zero self awareness. Go back and read your own posts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bottom line : no one was ‘offended’ at one of the hottest directors in Hollywood (and one of the hottest movie stars in Hollywood) on their sex scenes for the Sinners movie.

But you guys are offended that Baldoni, like Coogler, called for several sex scenes from several different actresses, and poor Blake thought they were in bad taste.

Tell that to Hailee Steinfeld and Michael B Jordan. Hailee will be happy to take on Blakes role in the next edition, regardless of who directs. Or a Jennifer Lawrence or a host of other actresses. Get Scarlett back! Shit she did that drama with Adam Driver!

There are so many other actresses that Baldoni can and should work with going forward.

Next

Do any of those actresses want to make a movie with Justin Baldoni? Even if he weren't involved in this lawsuit, I'm guessing the answer is no.

Why? Scarlett just did. Doesn’t get much bigger than her so confused as why you would say that.

No I mean as a director. Was Justin on the set of that movie? No. And Scarlett directed and Justin was not directly involved. Wayfarer was the financing producer. There were several smaller production companies involved. Neither Justin nor Heath have a p.g.a. credit on the movie.

Scarlett is not going to make a movie with Justin Baldoni as the director. Not now, not ever.

How would you know Arlington mom?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I guarantee that an actress will sign up to do a movie with Baldoni (Scarlett) much quicker than any actor will sign on to do a movie with Blake. She can just forget about that going forward.

But again, nearly everyone is ready to move on to a favorable settlement for Baldoni or a jury trial at this point. No one but you cares about Blake or her narrative anymore.

Let’s focus on procedure, settlement and/or trial issues.

Did anyone see Scarlett on SNL Saturday? I saw a clip with her cute hubby giving her flowers and kissing her! I like her. Been following her movies for a bit. Cants wait for all of her summer movies—Eleanor (Baldoni film) and Jurassic Park stuff!

And look at Florence/-killing the MCU universe with those box office numbers!!

Margot is looking to team with Gosling for Oceans.

Too many exciting actors out there to want to spend any more time on Blake.

When is Taylor dropping her next album or tour?

Saw SNL - they had another skit involving intimacy coordinators LOL

You are right - there are just too many actresses in that age range for Blake to compete with, with this stigma on her.

Meghann Fahy is 35 and she seems to be getting all the covered mid 30s roles these days. She just did Drop which has IEWU costar Brandon (Atlas) in it, her show Sirens comes out this week - with her, Kevin bacon and Julianne Moore.

You probably know her from The perfect couple with Nicole Kidman and season two of the White Lotus, where she played Daphne.

And of course Leighton Meester is in the radar again given Adam Brody captured everyone’ s heart in nobody wants us and she is in season two with him.

As for Taylor, there are rumors that she is coming out with some kind of tour in 2026.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bottom line : no one was ‘offended’ at one of the hottest directors in Hollywood (and one of the hottest movie stars in Hollywood) on their sex scenes for the Sinners movie.

But you guys are offended that Baldoni, like Coogler, called for several sex scenes from several different actresses, and poor Blake thought they were in bad taste.

Tell that to Hailee Steinfeld and Michael B Jordan. Hailee will be happy to take on Blakes role in the next edition, regardless of who directs. Or a Jennifer Lawrence or a host of other actresses. Get Scarlett back! Shit she did that drama with Adam Driver!

There are so many other actresses that Baldoni can and should work with going forward.

Next

Do any of those actresses want to make a movie with Justin Baldoni? Even if he weren't involved in this lawsuit, I'm guessing the answer is no.

Why? Scarlett just did. Doesn’t get much bigger than her so confused as why you would say that.

No I mean as a director. Was Justin on the set of that movie? No. And Scarlett directed and Justin was not directly involved. Wayfarer was the financing producer. There were several smaller production companies involved. Neither Justin nor Heath have a p.g.a. credit on the movie.

Scarlett is not going to make a movie with Justin Baldoni as the director. Not now, not ever.

How would you know Arlington mom?

I'm not "Arlington mom" but the reason why is Scarlett is an A-list actress who can do whatever projects she wants and she doesn't have to make corny schlock, which is all Baldoni has ever made. And also because no one will want to work with someone who, AT BEST, was an ineffectual and tone deaf director who was unprofessional on set and couldn't figure out how to work with a challenging lead. At worst, he is a harasser whose set was a hostile work environment and made multiple actresses uncomfortable and then retaliated against his lead via a PR campaign right as the movie was coming out.

I don't know where he lands along that continuum because I don't know who to believe here. But even if I take Justin at his word, he was pretty awful on this movie, talking out of both sides of his mouth, telling talent they could do whatever they want while telling other producers he was keeping her in check (he wasn't). He was also, sorry, a gigantic baby in post-production and during marketing of the film. The whiny messages with his editors during that whole situation? He comes off so unprofessional and weak. And then when he was mad about how promotion was going, he first claims some kind medical issue he now claims was related to the stress from the Blake situation (though he also had some medical issue with his leg in the fall -- he strikes me as the kind of person who suddenly has a medical malady when they want people to feel sorry for them which is super irritating) and then he just skipped town to hang out in Sweden in the weeks before the movie came out? And then he went to Sweden again right after the film opened? He seems like an unprofessional baby and yes that's true even if everything he alleges about Blake turns out to be true, which I'm open to. Grow up. You're a director of a major film with a global release via Sony. His behavior was ridiculous.

So no, ScarJo and Jennifer Lawrence are not going to do movies with him directing, lol. His rep as a director is toast. And that's in a town where Olivia Wilde is still getting directing jobs even after the mess she made on Don't Worry Darling. She might be messy but she at least got it together and did her job when it came to promoting the movie, even with all the awkwardness with Florence Pugh. Because she is an adult and Baldoni is a child. He is not cut out for this job. Go back to making sappy "documentary shorts" that prey on dying people in their last days or whatever he was doing before. He's not making A-list movies, not ever again.

[Anonymous]

Has Venable mooted their motion to quash in DC? Genuinely asking, I can't remember if someone linked that docket. Freedman said they would moot it because he was working with them "in good faith" now. I think it's weird they have not yet if that's the case. If they don't moot it, Wayfarer will owe a response on that docket soon.