|
Some surprises in here:
1. Harvard 2. Stanford 3. UPenn 4. Columbia 5. NYU 6. MIT 7. Northwestern 8. USC 9. UChicago 10. Yale 11. UC Berkeley 12. Cornell 13. UT Austin 14. Princeton 15. Notre Dame 16. UMichigan 17. UCLA 18. UVA 19. Boston U 20. UMiami |
| How do they “produce” them? Do they accept some 1000 SAT and 2.5 GPA kids from poor families and make them successful and wealthy? |
| The “surprises” being UT, Boston U & U Miami? At least for UM, they started wealthy. |
👏👏👏👏 |
| UT Austin, Michigan, UVA, Miami and Boston are surprises to me. And NYU being so high is also a bit unexpected, though not entirely surprising. |
| Why would anyone be surprised by UT Austin given what has happened to the economy in Texas?! |
| The Hermès of college brands in the US, seemingly. |
| Is anyone here really going to consider this information when making a decision on where to send there kid? Or is this just for fun? |
I think "the future of the 1%" may look quite a bit different in 20 years so I'm not taking much stock in this list or the message it's sending. |
| That’s just a list of cities where the money already is. You are observing the wrong direction of effect. |
| Those are all schools with MBA programs I believe. |
| Sounds about right. Many of these grads came from umc, privileged backgrounds with access to opportunities .. and some of these schools have strong networks that breed loyalty and further expand those opportunities. |
| I think some of these grads come from 1% families in the first place though, so...not sure how helpful the list really is just like this. |
Berkeley has very high percentage of low income students compared to other schooner the list. |