Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Big Brain Brett

https://www.instagram.com/p/BoQ3RYIFEGB/?taken-by=elarapictures

This is what I’ve been waiting for all day!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ford's building permit was from 2008, not 2012, now verified by the local paper.

https://padailypost.com/2018/09/25/building-permit-shows-christine-blasey-ford-really-did-put-a-backdoor-on-her-bedroom/

So where are Kavanaugh's building permits? And his wife is the town manager!

[Anonymous]

Rs voted for man who was recorded as saying how he liked to grab women by their p&ssies but then believed it was just locker room talk and he never did that. Of course you would believe K over a woman. Even when your guy is recorded saying sh1t like this you still believe his lies. If Kavanaugh said, yes, we had sex but it was consensual you would believe that over the rape allegation. Clearly, it doesn't matter what a woman says. Your partisan politics has affected your lenses.

That is why women are pi$$ed. Get it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Whatever you believe there is one thing I take away from this:

I'm scared to live in a world where we will believe something just because someone says it (whether you believe Ford or Bk). There is literally no proof in either direction. No witnesses really saying anything substantial on either side.

But regardless half are believing one side and the other half are believing the other side. With literally no proof. Am I the only one who finds this terrifying?

You've never been in court before, I'm guessing.

Our whole life is based upon this. You wrote this post, with literally no proof, that anyone will read it. And without any proof that it will have an outcome. Yet you wrote it. Why?

[Anonymous]

BREAKING: Kavanaugh friend Mark Judge says he'll cooperate with any law enforcement agency that investigates `confidentially'

https://twitter.com/AP_Politics/status/1045752974033788928

[Anonymous]

Judge agrees to be interviewed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Whatever you believe there is one thing I take away from this:

I'm scared to live in a world where we will believe something just because someone says it (whether you believe Ford or Bk). There is literally no proof in either direction. No witnesses really saying anything substantial on either side.

But regardless half are believing one side and the other half are believing the other side. With literally no proof. Am I the only one who finds this terrifying?

The hearing was framed as if only that single afternoon in the summer before (or after, whatever) BK's senior of high school was important. In that light, if everything happened exactly as Ford said, no, I don't think it would be decisive. But Ford has the weight of MeToo behind her and Kavanaugh has the weight of his past testimony, his past behavior during high school and college, his evasiveness under oath, his aggressive behavior yesterday, and tellingly the absence of his friend Judge. It's more than just a single afternoon in '82.

You are right. All that Kavanaugh has is what you described. No years of job experience, no years of judgeship, no years of marriage, no years of fatherhood, no years of coaching. None of that counts for anything. What counts is some chick who can't even remember which day she took a lie detector test, despite the fact it was an oh so traumatic experience and that she only had two days to choose from.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This seems significant...

Wall Street Journal: Mitchell advised Republicans that to continue questioning Kavanaugh she was required by her oath in Arizona to inform Kavanaugh of his rights after he lied to her about July 1, 1982 entry on his calender. Maryland statutes was last question she asked, then break was called..

I don’t think this was true; couldn’t find on the WSJ website.

It’s a false tweet. Curious that pp did not include the twitter handle in the tweet.
Here is someone from the WSJ in response to this tweet:

@murraymatt
Follow Follow @murraymatt
More
Please be leery of tweets purporting to pass on reporting from @WSJ without actual links. For the real, authoritative deal follow @WSJ and visit http://WSJ.com .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Whatever you believe there is one thing I take away from this:

I'm scared to live in a world where we will believe something just because someone says it (whether you believe Ford or Bk). There is literally no proof in either direction. No witnesses really saying anything substantial on either side.

But regardless half are believing one side and the other half are believing the other side. With literally no proof. Am I the only one who finds this terrifying?

The hearing was framed as if only that single afternoon in the summer before (or after, whatever) BK's senior of high school was important. In that light, if everything happened exactly as Ford said, no, I don't think it would be decisive. But Ford has the weight of MeToo behind her and Kavanaugh has the weight of his past testimony, his past behavior during high school and college, his evasiveness under oath, his aggressive behavior yesterday, and tellingly the absence of his friend Judge. It's more than just a single afternoon in '82.

You are right. All that Kavanaugh has is what you described. No years of job experience, no years of judgeship, no years of marriage, no years of fatherhood, no years of coaching. None of that counts for anything. What counts is some chick who can't even remember which day she took a lie detector test, despite the fact it was an oh so traumatic experience and that she only had two days to choose from.

He was attacking lefties yesterday. So much for an apolitical, nonpartisan Supreme Court.

[Anonymous]

All witnesses gave written sworn statements under the penalty of felony. That's not good enough for liberals, unless it's to get FISA warrants based on a pee document cobbled together from information from Russians. LOL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All witnesses gave written sworn statements under the penalty of felony. That's not good enough for liberals, unless it's to get FISA warrants based on a pee document cobbled together from information from Russians. LOL.

Such an awkward construction. Embarrassing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ford's building permit was from 2008, not 2012, now verified by the local paper.

https://padailypost.com/2018/09/25/building-permit-shows-christine-blasey-ford-really-did-put-a-backdoor-on-her-bedroom/

So where are Kavanaugh's building permits? And his wife is the town manager!

The Kavanaughs hid them. God forbid they expose his rape dungeon. Students at Yale told me it exists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ford's building permit was from 2008, not 2012, now verified by the local paper.

https://padailypost.com/2018/09/25/building-permit-shows-christine-blasey-ford-really-did-put-a-backdoor-on-her-bedroom/

So where are Kavanaugh's building permits? And his wife is the town manager!

She is part-time employee essentially managing an HOA of about 300 homes. Nothing wrong with that except the salary seems a bit high for the level of responsibility. $66k is more than many teachers or nurses make working full time.
http://www.chevychasesection5.org/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Whatever you believe there is one thing I take away from this:

I'm scared to live in a world where we will believe something just because someone says it (whether you believe Ford or Bk). There is literally no proof in either direction. No witnesses really saying anything substantial on either side.

But regardless half are believing one side and the other half are believing the other side. With literally no proof. Am I the only one who finds this terrifying?

You've never been in court before, I'm guessing.

Rarely is there direct evidence. Cases are almost always decided on circumstantial evidence. In this instance, the general consensus is that Prof. Ford did not have a motivation to lie, there was some evidence that she mentioned the event well before his nomination, and you got to see her demeanor while testifying. Judge Kavanaugh has a motive to lie, you saw his demeanor at the hearing and on Fox News, and how he answered questions about what he was like in prep. School vs. the picture depicted in his yearbook.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Whatever you believe there is one thing I take away from this:

I'm scared to live in a world where we will believe something just because someone says it (whether you believe Ford or Bk). There is literally no proof in either direction. No witnesses really saying anything substantial on either side.

But regardless half are believing one side and the other half are believing the other side. With literally no proof. Am I the only one who finds this terrifying?

You've never been in court before, I'm guessing.

Our whole life is based upon this. You wrote this post, with literally no proof, that anyone will read it. And without any proof that it will have an outcome. Yet you wrote it. Why?