You do realize that Northeastern is one of the most applied to schools in the entire country? So your little anecdote sounds pretty stupid. And yet you still won't name this mythical high school. Just stop lying and save face. |
What college did you get your education from? "I didn't apply and the kids at my school didn't apply, hence we can conclude......" Seriously what's wrong with these people
|
Either 100% of the seniors are dumb and/or the college counseling department sucks. |
I feel sorry for your kids. |
How would you possibly know which schools 600 student applied to? Don’t tell me they publish that information because they don’t. And what does it matter that your “high stats” kid isn’t interested in NEU? A lot kids aren’t. Boston hasn’t been brutally cold in ten years. Hopefully kids are choosing the best school for what they want to do. They can move when they graduate. |
Or the PP's story isn't true.
|
| Why is this thread still going sheesh. Let's just agree that NEU is a top 20 school because it has a 4% acceptance rate with high stats kids. Where it falls in the top 20 will always be up for debate. There, done. |
Not top 20. Not close either. You are dreaming. |
The same NEU sock puppet booster just can't let it go. NEU is a good school but it will never come close to the top 20 schools for a variety of reasons. That is not up for debate. There, done. |
|
Nevermind the trolls.
However the data and the facts show NU is actually on par with so called T20 schools in major metrics and performance. That's all. |
|
NEU is not a top 50 school. They gamed the system extensively to go up in rankings. This is pretty well documented, a couple of admissions books go over this in detail of how they did it.
It is a fine school but exhibit #1 why rankings are not an accurate way to assess a university. They are roughly right most of the time. |
|
NEU is following the rubric (same as our HS kids do). US News and World Reports grades based on X, so NEU focuses on X
And the school has improved tremendously in the past 20-30 years. Those whining about NEU gaming the system and that NEU will never be a top school are living in the past, not the present |
Top 20? No. Top 50? Probably. Out of 4,000 colleges, not bad at all. |
Lol! Not top 20! |
|
I don't think US News' rankings should matter at all, but Northeastern at least didn't cheat like Emory and Columbia. To me, that institutional behavior is inexcusable. It is one thing to focus on a metric, but quite another to just cheat.
I don't think many schools even care about US News' rankings nowadays. There is just way too much information available to parents and students than some "magazine". Majors, salary/incomes, selectivity, SAT scores, grad school outcomes are all information available to the consumer. I have a friend whose daughter attends SMU's B school. She loves it and has great internships. SMU suddenly became a crappy school because of US News? Same for Tulane. I don't think so. It is a predominantly wealthy school that in the name of equity US News suddenly hates. Likewise, UC Merced gamed the reputation ranking which comprises 20% of US News' ranking formula. All the other UC's and Cal States gave UC Merced a huge peer assessment. Everyone knows UC Merced is not a top 60 school, it can barely get the bottom of barrel students rejected from all the mainstream UC's. But the peer assessment combined with equity factors like first generation enrollment suddenly makes it better than much more established universities? No one is buying that. |