ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NM is going to get fired from GFR. RP has sued an won his first case (wrongful termination). Going to sue to regain control of the board. RS is corrupt and will be ousted

If that's true, it was the fastest conclusion of legal action in the history of the legal system. Wasn't he just fired from GFR about a month ago?

RP is not suing a person but rather a non-profit organization. He continues to do what he does best…stealing money from soccer families for doing absolutely nothing. Imagine resigning because you couldn’t get the board to fire your boss and then suing for wrongful termination. RP needs to get a life.

From what was said about it in another thread, it didn't sound like he resigned. It sounded like he was fired (and abruptly, too).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No one in their right mind is leaving for GA teams. Your kiddo would be better off at regional ECNL….anyone that knows the youth soccer landscape knows that. Soccer 101 for dummies

So you’re telling me kids are more willing to play 2012 vda than 2012 Syc? What a joke lmao.

If you would encourage your kid to do that your kids will hate you

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NEFC and Tophat will never get on btw. GA caters to them too much for them to leave

I think you will find the opposite, that is something said by a lot of the GA, is that the leagues focus in on the middle (was said on their call at the weekend by the league president).

Thats why the top end is racing to leave, it is the neglected part.

So you're not from a GA club but you know what was said in a mythical GA call (that didn't happen).

I don't believe you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one in their right mind is leaving for GA teams. Your kiddo would be better off at regional ECNL….anyone that knows the youth soccer landscape knows that. Soccer 101 for dummies

So you’re telling me kids are more willing to play 2012 vda than 2012 Syc? What a joke lmao.

If you would encourage your kid to do that your kids will hate you

Yes and the fact that you have to troll threads to bring up SYC means you already know that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NEFC and Tophat will never get on btw. GA caters to them too much for them to leave

I think you will find the opposite, that is something said by a lot of the GA, is that the leagues focus in on the middle (was said on their call at the weekend by the league president).

Thats why the top end is racing to leave, it is the neglected part.

Not doubting you, I just know that in the past, these two clubs have been pretty much black listed.

Makes sense though. GA is ramping up picking up these smaller teams.

It would make sense for ECNL to just go ahead and snag the last couple of clubs left at ga

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one in their right mind is leaving for GA teams. Your kiddo would be better off at regional ECNL….anyone that knows the youth soccer landscape knows that. Soccer 101 for dummies

So you’re telling me kids are more willing to play 2012 vda than 2012 Syc? What a joke lmao.

If you would encourage your kid to do that your kids will hate you

Yes and the fact that you have to troll threads to bring up SYC means you already know that.

What I’m saying is that not everyone cares about leagues like you think they do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You guys do realize the entire top end of the GA is desperately trying to lobby to get into ECNL?

Four years in and not a single Ecnl club has gone ga. In the same time….

Legends FC
Beach
Utah Royals
Bay Area Surf
Sporting Blue Valley
Colorado Rush
Ukrainian Nationals
Nationals Blue
Nationals Gray
Lonestar Red
Lonestar Black

With Lonestar being the first, how many others will jump to RL? Outside of the remaining 2-3 top end clubs (Tophat, NEFC… although there’s fresh rumors there !) then RL may be more appealing than GA very soon

I highly doubt that’s true. SYC dropped ECNL to go GA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Union will keep SYC’s players and Brave players will fill in the gaps.

Fixed that for you. Also, that’s a big question as to how many SYC players stay or go.

Talking girls? Nobody in their right mind would leave an established (albeit, evolving) ECNL club to go play for a club that was just given a GA patch.

Fairly certain there were some girls at tryouts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: The boys at Union are the sacrificial lambs in all of this. Union has always overlooked the boys in favor of the girls- more resources, more staff, more college focus- the ED and TD don’t even try to hide it. It’s been that way forever And now MYS is paying the piper for their complete absenteeism in investing in the boys side as ECNL came calling. Bravo to ECNL negotiators who somehow convinced an inept McLean administration to bend over backwards to solve Brave’s probation problem. How Brave became MYS’s problem is anybody’s guess. Rather than call ECNLs bluff (would ECNL really pull the girls charter-no), they roll over and do something that will lead to their eventual talent demise. RIP MYS. Enjoy the rec EDP and extra field space you now have. Union parents should band together and start a petition to oust the ED or find the many lawyers among their parent group to review the MYS charter to see if this raw deal the ED struck is even legal . Mys is a nonprofit and benefits from non profit status….the rush job on this deal with zero advance comms surely means they made mistakes in paperwork filing etc. Admin should go down in flames for this.

You are talking like anyone respects the MYS Union boys side. Both Brave and Union boys shouldn’t be in the ECNL. This merger makes sense for the boys but doesn’t for the girls.

[Anonymous]

BRAVE lost ECNL and McLean didn't.

You’re making stuff up. You have no idea what happened. If anything, it’s because SYC left for GA and now Union needs a new partner. The 2010G Union team had a lot of girls from SYC. The old SYC 2010 G team had been really really good and most of that talent went Union. And no I’m not one of their parents .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

BRAVE lost ECNL and McLean didn't.

You’re making stuff up. You have no idea what happened. If anything, it’s because SYC left for GA and now Union needs a new partner. The 2010G Union team had a lot of girls from SYC. The old SYC 2010 G team had been really really good and most of that talent went Union. And no I’m not one of their parents .

This is about BRAVE’s failure in ECNL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Union will keep SYC’s players and Brave players will fill in the gaps.

Fixed that for you. Also, that’s a big question as to how many SYC players stay or go.

Talking girls? Nobody in their right mind would leave an established (albeit, evolving) ECNL club to go play for a club that was just given a GA patch.

Tell me you're the biggest ECNL cheerleader in the world without saying it out loud.

This is a thread about two ECNL clubs but here you are, SYC dad interjecting yourself into every conversation in a desperate attempt to feel relevant.

It’s not a dad. It’s a syc coach. They are disappointed that after calling every one of their former players in Union, that the only ones that are considering coming back are the ones that don’t make FVU.
SYC is so mad they are not getting any attention right now. FVU ruined their party. But SYC will get some of the disappointed families. They will get even more disappointed when they realize no one at SYC has any college connections.

This doesn’t even make sense. SYC GA willl require commitments before the new FXV even has tryouts

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one in their right mind is leaving for GA teams. Your kiddo would be better off at regional ECNL….anyone that knows the youth soccer landscape knows that. Soccer 101 for dummies

So you’re telling me kids are more willing to play 2012 vda than 2012 Syc? What a joke lmao.

If you would encourage your kid to do that your kids will hate you

Yes and the fact that you have to troll threads to bring up SYC means you already know that.

What I’m saying is that not everyone cares about leagues like you think they do.

Anyone serious about playing past HS does care

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Union will keep SYC’s players and Brave players will fill in the gaps.

Fixed that for you. Also, that’s a big question as to how many SYC players stay or go.

Talking girls? Nobody in their right mind would leave an established (albeit, evolving) ECNL club to go play for a club that was just given a GA patch.

Fairly certain there were some girls at tryouts.

There have most definitely been some at tryouts, and I will not be surprised to see more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: The boys at Union are the sacrificial lambs in all of this. Union has always overlooked the boys in favor of the girls- more resources, more staff, more college focus- the ED and TD don’t even try to hide it. It’s been that way forever And now MYS is paying the piper for their complete absenteeism in investing in the boys side as ECNL came calling. Bravo to ECNL negotiators who somehow convinced an inept McLean administration to bend over backwards to solve Brave’s probation problem. How Brave became MYS’s problem is anybody’s guess. Rather than call ECNLs bluff (would ECNL really pull the girls charter-no), they roll over and do something that will lead to their eventual talent demise. RIP MYS. Enjoy the rec EDP and extra field space you now have. Union parents should band together and start a petition to oust the ED or find the many lawyers among their parent group to review the MYS charter to see if this raw deal the ED struck is even legal . Mys is a nonprofit and benefits from non profit status….the rush job on this deal with zero advance comms surely means they made mistakes in paperwork filing etc. Admin should go down in flames for this.

This was not done in a vacuum. It all had to be approved by the boards, ECNL, and others.