Glenn Youngkin’s underaged son tried to vote - twice

[Anonymous]

Oh this is beautiful. Who’s committing all the voter fraud again, Republicans?

https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/glenn-youngkins-underage-son-tried-to-vote-in-virginia-governors-election-officials-say/2870695/?_osource=SocialFlowTwt_DCBrand

[Anonymous]

Yawn. He did a dumb thing - but he didn't do anything illegal, as noted in the article. He was probably trying to see if they were paying attention, which they were. So that's a good thing.

[Anonymous]

Also: "all the voter fraud"?? Because a teen tried to test the system? Okaaayyy...

[Anonymous]

Not surprising. We know who is mostly trying to commit voter fraud, and it's not democrats or independents.

[Anonymous]

Based

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yawn. He did a dumb thing - but he didn't do anything illegal, as noted in the article. He was probably trying to see if they were paying attention, which they were. So that's a good thing.

Really? He went back again after being told no and argued with the volunteers. That’s a good thing?

[Anonymous]

And what if he was actually allowed to vote? What if he got through?
Also, he goes to the polls on Election Day to try to vote when he’s 17? Someone’s not paying attention in class. WTF?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yawn. He did a dumb thing - but he didn't do anything illegal, as noted in the article. He was probably trying to see if they were paying attention, which they were. So that's a good thing.

Really? He went back again after being told no and argued with the volunteers. That’s a good thing?

No - I said it was a good thing that the election official was paying attention. Reading is fundamental.

[Anonymous]

You spin me right right baby right round
Like a record player right right round round

Hilarious take, he was trying to expose fraud by trying to commit fraud. Ok. Sure Jan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yawn. He did a dumb thing - but he didn't do anything illegal, as noted in the article. He was probably trying to see if they were paying attention, which they were. So that's a good thing.

Really? He went back again after being told no and argued with the volunteers. That’s a good thing?

No - I said it was a good thing that the election official was paying attention. Reading is fundamental.

No, you said he was “probably trying to see if they were paying attention”. Bullshit.

[Anonymous]

Superdad did not even teach his kids about when they were eligible to vote and how to do it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yawn. He did a dumb thing - but he didn't do anything illegal, as noted in the article. He was probably trying to see if they were paying attention, which they were. So that's a good thing.

Really? He went back again after being told no and argued with the volunteers. That’s a good thing?

No - I said it was a good thing that the election official was paying attention. Reading is fundamental.

No, you said he was “probably trying to see if they were paying attention”. Bullshit.

JFC, you are obtuse, and that's being kind. I highlighted exactly what I said. You can run along and let the adults talk now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yawn. He did a dumb thing - but he didn't do anything illegal, as noted in the article. He was probably trying to see if they were paying attention, which they were. So that's a good thing.

Really? He went back again after being told no and argued with the volunteers. That’s a good thing?

No - I said it was a good thing that the election official was paying attention. Reading is fundamental.

No, you said he was “probably trying to see if they were paying attention”. Bullshit.

JFC, you are obtuse, and that's being kind. I highlighted exactly what I said. You can run along and let the adults talk now.

NP.

If he was testing them he wouldn’t have went back a second time nor argued.

But carry on with your “adult” excuses.

[Anonymous]

Don’t believe it. As many people here say, voter fraud doesn’t exist!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yawn. He did a dumb thing - but he didn't do anything illegal, as noted in the article. He was probably trying to see if they were paying attention, which they were. So that's a good thing.

Really? He went back again after being told no and argued with the volunteers. That’s a good thing?

No - I said it was a good thing that the election official was paying attention. Reading is fundamental.

No, you said he was “probably trying to see if they were paying attention”. Bullshit.

JFC, you are obtuse, and that's being kind. I highlighted exactly what I said. You can run along and let the adults talk now.

NP.

If he was testing them he wouldn’t have went back a second time nor argued.

But carry on with your “adult” excuses.

I already said he shouldn't have done that. Is it this hard for you dummies to grasp English? The point is that the official was on top of it and didn't allow him to vote. But "OUTRAGE"!!