GA Case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump is now trying to move his case to Federal Court. Looks like Meadows, Eastman and Trump are coordinating.

So the traitors are trying to court shop again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This letter is simply masterful

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23941366/jim-jordan-letter.pdf


Everyone should read it.

I am officially 💀

Chef’s kiss, ma’am. Masters Class

It’s so, so good.

I agree that it's perfect.
But why does she have to waste time answering Gym?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This letter is simply masterful

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23941366/jim-jordan-letter.pdf


Everyone should read it.

Agree that the whole thing should be read. But if you’re short on time skip to the second half and the last couple of pages where she suggests how he might better use his time and office should be sent to his constituents.

[Anonymous]

"as a non-member of the bar".... that killed me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump is now trying to move his case to Federal Court. Looks like Meadows, Eastman and Trump are coordinating.

It’s still Georgia state law that applies. It seems unlikely to me that a federal court will take it. They have to apply foreign law, which they are generally reluctant to do. And why put this mess in their court?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This letter is simply masterful

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23941366/jim-jordan-letter.pdf


Everyone should read it.

I am officially 💀

Chef’s kiss, ma’am. Masters Class

Nobody puts Fani in a corner!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This letter is simply masterful

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23941366/jim-jordan-letter.pdf


Everyone should read it.

I am officially 💀

Chef’s kiss, ma’am. Masters Class

It’s so, so good.

I agree that it's perfect.
But why does she have to waste time answering Gym?

Because he opened a Congressional investigation into her office. https://abcnews.go.com/US/live-updates/trump-georgia-surrender/gopled-committee-opens-investigation-into-da-fani-willis-102532046?id=102463778&cid=social_twitter_abcn

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Judge Luttig is talking about the possibility that Georgia will use 14A to disqualify Trump from running for office.

If any Secretary of State leaves Trump off of a ballot due to the 14th amendment his campaign will challenge in court, it will go up to SCOTUS, and SCOTUS will order that he be put on the ballot. It’s an interesting legal exercise but pointless as any kind of practical solution.

I wouldn't count on that. First, the 14th Amendment is pretty clear. SCOTUS may await consideration or determination pending the outcome of GA or some of the other cases, but if someone is convicted of sedition against the United States, then it is cut and dried. Also, the SCOTUS is made up of Federalist Society judges who are at the end of the day, not Trump supporters. Trump was a vessel not their leader.

Trump hasn’t been charged with sedition so he’s not going to get convicted of it. Even the Proud Boys and Oathkeepers who were convicted of seditious conspiracy weren’t convicted of sedition. I hate Trump too but please don’t waste hopes on this.

I don't think this 14th amendment stuff makes much sense, but it has to be pointed out that the 14th amendment doesn't say anything about convictions. IT says that any officer of the US who "shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion" or given aid and comfort, is ineligible. The amendment was specifically targeted at confederates, and very few of them were ever prosecuted or convicted of treason or anything similar.

The meaning of the words “engaged” and “insurrection or rebellion” will need to be determined by the courts.

So? Courts do stuff like that every day without relying on criminal convictions.

[Anonymous]

I would’ve loved to be a fly on the wall while Fani was having that letter drafted.

AND in Gym’s office when he read it.

I need a fainting couch!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would’ve loved to be a fly on the wall while Fani was having that letter drafted.

AND in Gym’s office when he read it.

I need a fainting couch!

I don’t think he’ll ever read it, or if he does, I don’t think he can absorb what it means.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"as a non-member of the bar".... that killed me.

Me, too. In case others don’t know, Jordan has a JD from Capital University but has never passed the bar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"as a non-member of the bar".... that killed me.

Me, too. In case others don’t know, Jordan has a JD from Capital University but has never passed the bar.

💯

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This letter is simply masterful

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23941366/jim-jordan-letter.pdf


Everyone should read it.

Wow.
The lady pulls no punches.
And Jordan deserves every bit of it.
She beat him to a bloody pulp (metaphorically).
I'm so proud of her!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"as a non-member of the bar".... that killed me.

Me, too. In case others don’t know, Jordan has a JD from Capital University but has never passed the bar.

I missed the implication of that phrase

Thanks for letting us know.

I'd never heard of Capital University. US News ranks it #175 in "best" law schools.

I love Fanni even more!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"as a non-member of the bar".... that killed me.

Me, too. In case others don’t know, Jordan has a JD from Capital University but has never passed the bar.

I missed the implication of that phrase

Thanks for letting us know.

I'd never heard of Capital University. US News ranks it #175 in "best" law schools.

I love Fanni even more!!!

Worth noting that there are 199 accredited law schools.