| Than yourself? Would it be necessary for you both to have a particularly strong connection or her to have a particularly good personality, for example? |
|
No because if you are writing this absurd thing you don't love the person. You are shallow. They should not be settling for you.
|
Only if the sex is great |
The most interesting thing about this question is that it seems to presume that if you can get a conventionally beautiful woman to marry you, you don't need to have a particularly strong connection to her or for her to have a particularly good personality. Just "look guys, I caught one!"
|
Why do I keep feeling like these questions are for a sociology paper? The OP never discusses themselves or their preferences or background, it's always a really specific statement question... |
| No but I laugh when I see all those fat tatted rejects on Tinder making outlandish demands for commitment from high-quality men. |
| I would hope in order to marry somebody you'd have a stong connection. Conventionally beautiful or not. |
|
You’re bizarre Op.
Go philosophize your nonsense somewhere else. |
| How the heck are you going to even date someone you don’t find attractive? |
How did you get that from this post? |
| Average or below average looking women get married all the time, but you shouldn't marry someone who you don't find attractive. |
Not what I said. I mean if you have a stronger connection with a less conventionally beautiful woman than to one who is, if you have a connection with both of them. Same thing with personality. |
OP of this thread. No, and I think you'd need informed consent to survey people here for that. |
| Most men are willing to go down in looks to go up in great personality. To a man, having a great personality means being pleasant to be around, cooperative, understanding, calm, centered, and kind. If you can do all of these, then you are a keeper. He'll be running to buy a ring. |
What? Nothing here was about philosophy. |