|
Well, I looked up my kid's actual PK3 schedule at a T1 DCPS.
8:30-9:00 Breakfast and "morning activities" whatever that is. 9-9:15: Morning Meeting 9:15-9:30: Writing or pre-writing activities like fine motor and alphabet manipulatives. 9:30-10:20: Centers/small group-- the centers were entirely free play so count as about 15 mins of academics. 10:30-11:15: Specials, which also involved some free play with specials materials such as paint. The teachers came to their classroom except for PE, so no transition. 11:15-12:15: Lunch in room, then recess out front so 5 mins transition out. 12:15-12:30: Transition back inside, do bathroom and hand-washing. 12:30-2: Rest time (nap) 2-2:15: Snack 2:15-2:20: Dance break 2:20-2:45: Math in small groups 2:45-3: Interactive Read Aloud 3-3:15: Closing routine (song, jackets and backpacks) and dismissal. So academically... 15 mins for writing, 15 mins for morning small group, 15 mins for small group math, and then if you're counting the read-aloud as academic that's another 15. So an hour on a normal day. Less on a day with anything unusual happening. I think the truth of it is, there wasn't that much free play-- not because of a huge academic load but because a lot of time is spent on nap, lunch, recess, toileting, and transitions. My DD didn't take naps in PK3, so she would play quietly on her cot or look at a book. I think that was a big part of why she learned to read so well. But the teacher did intervene with a few key phonics things like "qu" and "ph" sounds, which gave her reading a boost. But I'm not counting that as academic time. It was just what she wanted to do during resting time. |
Well, at our school they would be pulled out from centers to do things like math manipulatives with the teacher. Or for each kid to work on writing their own name with help. Or sometimes it was to talk about a behavioral or social development issue. And then you have all the IEP-related push-ins and pull-outs, which ideally would be worked into the centers play but that's not always feasible depending on what the service actually is. |
I never said that my experience was unique. Someone asked and I gave examples of how it is easy for the day to be all play based. If you had a similar experience then good for you. But it sounds like central is giving top down orders to DCPS teachers now about a lot of academic requirements, and I find that really sad for the kids. |
Does this school you’re describing still function this way today? Curious if trending differently. Also wish people would name schools but I get it. |
I'm the PP and that's our T1 experience. The person I respond to said it's terrible there was no play but centers. What you're describing are centers. |
|
The top two current threads on this subpage are basically:
1) DCPS does too much academically early on and is bad for kids 2) DCPS is terrible for academically focused kids because it doesn't do tracking early on I'm by no means defending DCPS, there needs to be a wholesale re-evaluation and shakeup with a new mayor (and an elimination of mayoral control) but you can see why there's a near impossible set of expectations and that's just from the UMC set. Now throw in a very large pool of at-risk and IEP students. |
But your schedule only has 2 blocks of centers in the whole day and in those blocks are small groups also. Other blocks are academics. So no your schedule is not play based the whole day and even in the center blocks there are kids who are not playing if there are small groups. |
Sorry you are confused and it’s not both at the same time. Early on with the little ones it’s play based. Then in upper elementary is where you need tracking. That is why in many school districts, like the one I grew up in, G and T did not start until 3rd grade. Other school districts track by doing group pull outs. |
Do you know what those small groups are doing? This went from there's no play! To there's not enough play! To sure there's play but there's also some academics and that's bad period! Specials and recess are also usually play. There's a weird subset that's basically like if my kid learns to count in school that's bad and I agree with a different PP that's kind of odd. None of it is like the school in Matilda. It's basically sure you have play and then there's also some learning. And if your kid hates that I get it and that's OK it has no future bearing, but when people are telling you their kids are happy and socially thriving in school and people are yelling at you that your experience is wrong it's pretty off-putting. |
No one said PP experience is wrong but it certainly is more academic than play based and it certainly is not all day play based. If parents are OK with a heavy academic day, that is fine but let’s be clear that this is not play based focused. It is academic focused. |
There are roughly six hours in a school day and taking out nap and lunch that's four. So we're at a max 50/50 academic and play and it seems like even the academic schedule is less than 50 percent play. Seems more balanced than academic focused. I get everyone wants the idyllic Scandi model but they have like a 1:5 ratio of kids to teachers, an entire year of parental leave, significantly more days off, and a social welfare system that allows for more free time and relaxing. I would love to have that. We don't. Happy to pay more in taxes for that but most people in this country don't want to. The focus of those countries early childhood are the core tenants of social welfare and collaboration. Someone implementing that in a US public school would be yelled at and called a commie. By age 8 everyone is screaming that if there kid isn't testing in the 99th percentile they're screwed and it's all the schools fault. It's an impossible system. But it's not a uniquely DCPS impossible system. |
Sorry but you are deluding yourself and trying to justify things. You can’t see outside your T1 bubble. Go see some of the popular charters discussed on here. There is no academic math or literacy blocks or daily worksheets or HW. Parents would have an uprising over a schedule like this. |
Which charters? For ECE these days it seems to be mostly about the immersion schools. |
You’re misunderstanding what we (teachers and some parents) are saying though. You can learn counting through play, it doesn’t have to be at the table, that’s more formal at not developmentally appropriate for pre-k. What’s off-putting is SOME parents getting defensive without trying to understand because you are taking everything personally. I have read so many other teachers say play is learning -especially guided play and a rich environment. That’s why great reggio programs for example thrive. Play based doesn’t mean a lack of pre-academic skills being taught -it’s learning that through the environment and the teacher’s expertise. Your experience is not wrong, what teachers are warning about is this is becoming worse and more tech is involved. A happy child is wonderful and important. But so is ensuring developmentally appropriate practices. Especially for at risk students -who are getting iPads and utilizing tech at a younger age than even 2 years ago. All in all I understand it’s a touchy subject. A little small group isn’t the devil, it’s the amount many schools are starting to require. You should not be seeing kids for 20-30 min a day or have play be a short part of the day. |
But, look, that’s also what lots of non-T1 ECEs are like. I had no idea other schools were being forced to implement insane academic requirements… I guess our school just doesn’t do them? For sure, Building Blocks does not appear outside the games & puzzles station until PK4. There are no iPads at all. There are two recesses, which amount to 1 hour or even more in nice weather. The reason I am so sure the academics were nothing like this thread is describing is because the transition to K, which is much more academic at our school, was rough… and even K had 1.5 hours of center time daily! |