Montgomery County - What Happened?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Moco is on the Baltimore city game plan. Just look to balt city if you want to see the future of moco.


Racists like YOU hate it? Yes please! Yes you’re racist. Your mother lied to you, you’re a bad person.


A lot of cope and deflection but no answers. Why did it slip from the richest county in the country to poorer than Calvert County and Stafford County?

Current Rankings:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-income_counties_in_the_United_States


I’ve noticed a trend on this board from people that are in north Virginia. They seem to have an inferiority complex about MoCo. People in MoCo rarely think about NoVa or post about it but people from there seem to be obsessed with Montgomery county. It’s truly a mental illness.

They do.
The whole area is obsessed with MoCo
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Moco is on the Baltimore city game plan. Just look to balt city if you want to see the future of moco.


Racists like YOU hate it? Yes please! Yes you’re racist. Your mother lied to you, you’re a bad person.


A lot of cope and deflection but no answers. Why did it slip from the richest county in the country to poorer than Calvert County and Stafford County?

Current Rankings:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-income_counties_in_the_United_States


I’ve noticed a trend on this board from people that are in north Virginia. They seem to have an inferiority complex about MoCo. People in MoCo rarely think about NoVa or post about it but people from there seem to be obsessed with Montgomery county. It’s truly a mental illness.

They do.
The whole area is obsessed with MoCo


Obsessed or sick of Marylanders creating traffic jams on our smaller roads so they can commute to jobs here that Dems destroyed in MoCo?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Montgomery County had the highest median family income out of any county in America with more than 20,000 residents in the 1980s. It was close to the top in the 70s as well.

Now it’s ranked 20th, with 5 counties in NoVa in front of it. What has changed since the 1980s and can it change course?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/local/1984/03/21/which-is-richerfairfax-and-montgomery-lead-census-bureaus-list-of-wealthiest-large-counties/48976a8b-e4cf-4aac-8c4b-a3bd43d10c92/

Fairfax and Montgomery counties, the Washington area's two most affluent suburbs, are also the two richest large counties in the nation, according to a new compilation of data by the U.S. Census Bureau.

Four county equivalents called boroughs in oil-rich and high-priced Alaska have even higher median household incomes, the bureau said, but none of them has more than 20,000 residents. The highest is Bristol Bay, Alaska--median income $33,516, population 1,094.

The rankings, published in the Census Bureau's new County and City Data Book, come from the 1980 census.
Fairfax and Montgomery were also at the top of the county income heap in the 1970 census. At that time, the rankings were compiled according to median family income and placed Montgomery slightly ahead of Fairfax.

In the new data, incomes are given for households, including not only families, which the census defines as married couples and their children living at home, but also unmarried couples, roommates and singles.

By this reckoning the median household income for Fairfax is $30,011, more than a thousand dollars above the $28,987 reported for Montgomery. However, Montgomery is still slightly ahead of Fairfax in median family income, $33,702 to $33,173



The Internet. Dot-com millionaires and data centers.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Moco is on the Baltimore city game plan. Just look to balt city if you want to see the future of moco.


Racists like YOU hate it? Yes please! Yes you’re racist. Your mother lied to you, you’re a bad person.


A lot of cope and deflection but no answers. Why did it slip from the richest county in the country to poorer than Calvert County and Stafford County?

Current Rankings:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-income_counties_in_the_United_States


I’ve noticed a trend on this board from people that are in north Virginia. They seem to have an inferiority complex about MoCo. People in MoCo rarely think about NoVa or post about it but people from there seem to be obsessed with Montgomery county. It’s truly a mental illness.

They do.
The whole area is obsessed with MoCo


Judging from the amount of southbound traffic on the American Legion Bridge in the morning rush hours and on weekends before Christmas I’d say that you’ve got this completely backwards. If that bridge was out of operation for a month Maryland would go bankrupt and their residents would storm the County Council. The only people in Virginia who’d be upset would be kayakers.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Moco is on the Baltimore city game plan. Just look to balt city if you want to see the future of moco.


Racists like YOU hate it? Yes please! Yes you’re racist. Your mother lied to you, you’re a bad person.


A lot of cope and deflection but no answers. Why did it slip from the richest county in the country to poorer than Calvert County and Stafford County?

Current Rankings:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-income_counties_in_the_United_States


I’ve noticed a trend on this board from people that are in north Virginia. They seem to have an inferiority complex about MoCo. People in MoCo rarely think about NoVa or post about it but people from there seem to be obsessed with Montgomery county. It’s truly a mental illness.

They do.
The whole area is obsessed with MoCo


Judging from the amount of southbound traffic on the American Legion Bridge in the morning rush hours and on weekends before Christmas I’d say that you’ve got this completely backwards. If that bridge was out of operation for a month Maryland would go bankrupt and their residents would storm the County Council. The only people in Virginia who’d be upset would be kayakers.


What a sad state of affairs. The capacity of that bridge has become the primary limiter on the county’s growth. Developers don’t build housing here because you can’t send too many more cars across that bridge.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My perspective is that there MoCo has a huge, and ever growing, population of low-income illegal immigrants.

Also, Maryland and MoCo are anti-business, pro-tax jurisdictions. It would defy logic for any major business operation to stand up operations in MoCo.





The County Executive and Council have implemented sanctuary policies that prohibit local law enforcement from cooperating with Federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).


That is not true. They have implemented policies that follow the constitution. Under Obama, he was able to for relationships between ICE and moco police so ICE could deport criminals (not preschool teachers) and not violate the constitution. Obama deported more immigrants from MOCO than any other president.


...it was also most from US than any other president (until now don't know how numbers compare to current president)
Anonymous
I don’t know why this is complicated. MoCo simply has faltered in terms of large and mid size corporate growth over the past decade or so — this is a fairly simple concept but people on here like to “debate” this offer and over.

This is due to a few factors, but two of which are key:

1) geography / preexisting conditions— MoCo was far more developed going back decades as compared to NoVa, which still had plenty of farm land and close as Dulles well into the 90’s and early 2000’s. What this allowed was the accommodations (land) necessary for the emergence of the data center industry, which was complementary to the existing presence of the pentagon and defense contracting industries. This spurred follow on tech / IT growth and the resulting job growth that has led to a massive wealth boom in NoVa.

2) pro growth politics, and I’ll caveat this by saying that this isn’t a democrat republican thing as both are blue counties in blue states, though I will say that Maryland is decidedly more progressive, which can be a negative thing when this takes an anti-corporate posture. Virginia has seemingly done a far better job in attracting corporations. Coupled with a lower overall tax burden, it’s no surprise that corporates prefer Virginia

3) pro immigrant politics — again, Maryland is decidedly more progressive, which has led to a relatively greater influx of undocumented immigrants driving down median metrics. In addition, immigrants absorb existing housing stock, and we have seen areas like Wheaton and parts of Silver Spring shift more towards predominantly Latino working class enclaves, while the former middle class population has moved either up county or to other states.

Why this is controversial is beyond me — it is just a fact of life. Areas change.
Anonymous
It’s controversial for Moco folks for a few reasons:

1 Unwillingness to believe it was their political choice that caused the problem. They’ve been voting against business and for immigration for 4 decades and thought it was the right thing and didn’t think about the consequences.

2. Most people in the nice parts of Moco (lots of DCUM) could care less about the decline of the county or don’t even see it and have blinders on. They are keeping up just fine, and only get annoyed around school boundary debates.

3. Disdain for their nouveau riche NOVA neighbors distinct lack of taste. And here’s where I agree with them — all of the business development resulted in a gilded tacky dystopia that will age horribly. With that in mind, it’s hard to believe NOVA is ahead.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I don’t know why this is complicated. MoCo simply has faltered in terms of large and mid size corporate growth over the past decade or so — this is a fairly simple concept but people on here like to “debate” this offer and over.

This is due to a few factors, but two of which are key:

1) geography / preexisting conditions— MoCo was far more developed going back decades as compared to NoVa, which still had plenty of farm land and close as Dulles well into the 90’s and early 2000’s. What this allowed was the accommodations (land) necessary for the emergence of the data center industry, which was complementary to the existing presence of the pentagon and defense contracting industries. This spurred follow on tech / IT growth and the resulting job growth that has led to a massive wealth boom in NoVa.

2) pro growth politics, and I’ll caveat this by saying that this isn’t a democrat republican thing as both are blue counties in blue states, though I will say that Maryland is decidedly more progressive, which can be a negative thing when this takes an anti-corporate posture. Virginia has seemingly done a far better job in attracting corporations. Coupled with a lower overall tax burden, it’s no surprise that corporates prefer Virginia

3) pro immigrant politics — again, Maryland is decidedly more progressive, which has led to a relatively greater influx of undocumented immigrants driving down median metrics. In addition, immigrants absorb existing housing stock, and we have seen areas like Wheaton and parts of Silver Spring shift more towards predominantly Latino working class enclaves, while the former middle class population has moved either up county or to other states.

Why this is controversial is beyond me — it is just a fact of life. Areas change.


On No. 1, MoCo had and continues to have a vast amount of farmland. It chose to make it off limits, just like it chose to believe that roads were evil because of “induced demand.” YIMBYs oddly are some of the biggest complainers about “induced demand” which is odd because roads induce demand for housing and offices, which developers are happy to build when there’s demand.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It’s controversial for Moco folks for a few reasons:

1 Unwillingness to believe it was their political choice that caused the problem. They’ve been voting against business and for immigration for 4 decades and thought it was the right thing and didn’t think about the consequences.

2. Most people in the nice parts of Moco (lots of DCUM) could care less about the decline of the county or don’t even see it and have blinders on. They are keeping up just fine, and only get annoyed around school boundary debates.

3. Disdain for their nouveau riche NOVA neighbors distinct lack of taste. And here’s where I agree with them — all of the business development resulted in a gilded tacky dystopia that will age horribly. With that in mind, it’s hard to believe NOVA is ahead.


I think you nailed it. MoCo posters — look, just accept the W that the nicer suburban parts of MoCo are leafier and nicer and more established feeling than McLean etc. That’s a W — however your county has dropped significantly in economic standing while theirs has increased.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It’s controversial for Moco folks for a few reasons:

1 Unwillingness to believe it was their political choice that caused the problem. They’ve been voting against business and for immigration for 4 decades and thought it was the right thing and didn’t think about the consequences.

2. Most people in the nice parts of Moco (lots of DCUM) could care less about the decline of the county or don’t even see it and have blinders on. They are keeping up just fine, and only get annoyed around school boundary debates.

3. Disdain for their nouveau riche NOVA neighbors distinct lack of taste. And here’s where I agree with them — all of the business development resulted in a gilded tacky dystopia that will age horribly. With that in mind, it’s hard to believe NOVA is ahead.


I think you nailed it. MoCo posters — look, just accept the W that the nicer suburban parts of MoCo are leafier and nicer and more established feeling than McLean etc. That’s a W — however your county has dropped significantly in economic standing while theirs has increased.


I don’t wish to accept that. I think the county’s leaders have made a big mistake by spending nearly all of their economic development money on handouts for landlords. If they had spent that money on attracting businesses they wouldn’t have to subsidize market rate apartment builders and would have more money to spend on subsidized housing for people who need it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It’s controversial for Moco folks for a few reasons:

1 Unwillingness to believe it was their political choice that caused the problem. They’ve been voting against business and for immigration for 4 decades and thought it was the right thing and didn’t think about the consequences.

2. Most people in the nice parts of Moco (lots of DCUM) could care less about the decline of the county or don’t even see it and have blinders on. They are keeping up just fine, and only get annoyed around school boundary debates.

3. Disdain for their nouveau riche NOVA neighbors distinct lack of taste. And here’s where I agree with them — all of the business development resulted in a gilded tacky dystopia that will age horribly. With that in mind, it’s hard to believe NOVA is ahead.


I think you nailed it. MoCo posters — look, just accept the W that the nicer suburban parts of MoCo are leafier and nicer and more established feeling than McLean etc. That’s a W — however your county has dropped significantly in economic standing while theirs has increased.


I don’t wish to accept that. I think the county’s leaders have made a big mistake by spending nearly all of their economic development money on handouts for landlords. If they had spent that money on attracting businesses they wouldn’t have to subsidize market rate apartment builders and would have more money to spend on subsidized housing for people who need it.


I love how your answer to MoCo’s lack of business growth is spend money and subsidize the poor. This is why MoCo is declining — because the majority voters want higher taxes, and more spending.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Why do we need to be #1? I especially don’t want it if it means living among giant data centers everywhere.


But they aren't "everywhere." NOVA and MoCo are so large that many of the posts in this thread are meaningless.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I’ve been a MoCo resident and I look forward to moving out when our jobs and kid’s schools don’t keep us in this area. The schools aren’t that great, despite the ratings. Too much focus on nonsense, not enough on real education. Allowing illegal immigration doesn’t bring jobs and lowers safety, especially for women. The area can’t even keep any luxury shopping, unlike tysons or even city center. It’s beyond me why anyone would want to be here as a business owner. So many better options. We’ll make our millions here and happily move to another jurisdiction in retirement.

As someone who fled an Islamic regime that oppressed women and forced them to wear veils, it’s beyond disturbing to me to see more and more of them walking around. So sad to see young girls forced to cover themselves and see others applaud it based on diversity. You really are a naive bunch. Those of us who fled a revolution know what is and isn’t voluntary.


What you've described in the bolded text above is probably 20 times more prevalent in NoVA than in MoCo. I spend a lot of time in both areas, and it's not even close.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It’s controversial for Moco folks for a few reasons:

1 Unwillingness to believe it was their political choice that caused the problem. They’ve been voting against business and for immigration for 4 decades and thought it was the right thing and didn’t think about the consequences.

2. Most people in the nice parts of Moco (lots of DCUM) could care less about the decline of the county or don’t even see it and have blinders on. They are keeping up just fine, and only get annoyed around school boundary debates.

3. Disdain for their nouveau riche NOVA neighbors distinct lack of taste. And here’s where I agree with them — all of the business development resulted in a gilded tacky dystopia that will age horribly. With that in mind, it’s hard to believe NOVA is ahead.


I think you nailed it. MoCo posters — look, just accept the W that the nicer suburban parts of MoCo are leafier and nicer and more established feeling than McLean etc. That’s a W — however your county has dropped significantly in economic standing while theirs has increased.


I don’t wish to accept that. I think the county’s leaders have made a big mistake by spending nearly all of their economic development money on handouts for landlords. If they had spent that money on attracting businesses they wouldn’t have to subsidize market rate apartment builders and would have more money to spend on subsidized housing for people who need it.


I love how your answer to MoCo’s lack of business growth is spend money and subsidize the poor. This is why MoCo is declining — because the majority voters want higher taxes, and more spending.


You misunderstood. I want to spend economic development money on attracting businesses. Andrew Friedson has been spending it on bailing out his donors who overpaid for land.
post reply Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Message Quick Reply
Go to: