How are Rs going to overcome the pro-pedophilia label?

[Anonymous]

The more they drag their feet and refuse to release the files, the more dirty and guilty they are where it comes to siding with and protecting vile predators.

[Anonymous]

They could shake the name of being pro-pedophilia if they, you know, gave up on being blatantly pro-pedophiles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
They could shake the name of being pro-pedophilia if they, you know, gave up on being blatantly pro-pedophiles.

It couldn’t hurt if they cared to try.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If every adult man ever attracted to a post pubescent female under the age of 18 is now a pedophile, what are we going to call actual pedophiles?

That doesn't look post-pubescent to me

Dont you see the bush?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If every adult man ever attracted to a post pubescent female under the age of 18 is now a pedophile, what are we going to call actual pedophiles?

That doesn't look post-pubescent to me

Dont you see the bush?

And it's just a disembodied torso. Just a sex object. Sick.

Trump is a disgusting pig.

[Anonymous]

If a Dem wins the upcoming special election in Arizona, there will be enough votes to force the disclosure of the Epstein files.

[Anonymous]

Dems are getting desperate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dems are getting desperate.

😆😆😆

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If every adult man ever attracted to a post pubescent female under the age of 18 is now a pedophile, what are we going to call actual pedophiles?

So you’re going with the “it’s natural” argument.

[Anonymous]

They could honor Charlie Kirk by demanding the release of the Epstein files.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They could honor Charlie Kirk by demanding the release of the Epstein files.

They do seem to be disrespecting his wishes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If a Dem wins the upcoming special election in Arizona, there will be enough votes to force the disclosure of the Epstein files.

Splendid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dems are getting desperate.

Yeah, all those Democrats calling for the release of the Epstein files. That's who Trump was talking to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If every adult man ever attracted to a post pubescent female under the age of 18 is now a pedophile, what are we going to call actual pedophiles?

So you’re going with the “it’s natural” argument.

I am suggesting there may be a distinction between actual pedophilia (attraction to biological pre-pubescent children) and attraction to females who have completed puberty and are physically women, whether they have reached 18 or not.

I’m not at all saying it’s a good thing. It’s gross, disgusting, and wrong due to power imbalance and exploitation, but it’s not pedophilia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If every adult man ever attracted to a post pubescent female under the age of 18 is now a pedophile, what are we going to call actual pedophiles?

So you’re going with the “it’s natural” argument.

I am suggesting there may be a distinction between actual pedophilia (attraction to biological pre-pubescent children) and attraction to females who have completed puberty and are physically women, whether they have reached 18 or not.

I’m not at all saying it’s a good thing. It’s gross, disgusting, and wrong due to power imbalance and exploitation, but it’s not pedophilia.

That's not a drawing of a post-pubescant female