How are Rs going to overcome the pro-pedophilia label?

[Anonymous]

If a Dem wins the upcoming special election in Arizona, there will be enough votes to force the disclosure of the Epstein files.

[Anonymous]

Dems are getting desperate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dems are getting desperate.

😆😆😆

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If every adult man ever attracted to a post pubescent female under the age of 18 is now a pedophile, what are we going to call actual pedophiles?

So you’re going with the “it’s natural” argument.

[Anonymous]

They could honor Charlie Kirk by demanding the release of the Epstein files.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They could honor Charlie Kirk by demanding the release of the Epstein files.

They do seem to be disrespecting his wishes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If a Dem wins the upcoming special election in Arizona, there will be enough votes to force the disclosure of the Epstein files.

Splendid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dems are getting desperate.

Yeah, all those Democrats calling for the release of the Epstein files. That's who Trump was talking to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If every adult man ever attracted to a post pubescent female under the age of 18 is now a pedophile, what are we going to call actual pedophiles?

So you’re going with the “it’s natural” argument.

I am suggesting there may be a distinction between actual pedophilia (attraction to biological pre-pubescent children) and attraction to females who have completed puberty and are physically women, whether they have reached 18 or not.

I’m not at all saying it’s a good thing. It’s gross, disgusting, and wrong due to power imbalance and exploitation, but it’s not pedophilia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If every adult man ever attracted to a post pubescent female under the age of 18 is now a pedophile, what are we going to call actual pedophiles?

So you’re going with the “it’s natural” argument.

I am suggesting there may be a distinction between actual pedophilia (attraction to biological pre-pubescent children) and attraction to females who have completed puberty and are physically women, whether they have reached 18 or not.

I’m not at all saying it’s a good thing. It’s gross, disgusting, and wrong due to power imbalance and exploitation, but it’s not pedophilia.

That's not a drawing of a post-pubescant female

[Anonymous]

Apparently the answer is that they are going send the national guard to Memphis’s in response to a murder in Utah.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If every adult man ever attracted to a post pubescent female under the age of 18 is now a pedophile, what are we going to call actual pedophiles?

So you’re going with the “it’s natural” argument.

I am suggesting there may be a distinction between actual pedophilia (attraction to biological pre-pubescent children) and attraction to females who have completed puberty and are physically women, whether they have reached 18 or not.

I’m not at all saying it’s a good thing. It’s gross, disgusting, and wrong due to power imbalance and exploitation, but it’s not pedophilia.

The GOP will protect both the attraction of post-pubescent and pedophilia version. And, GOP will go beyond protecting attraction, to ensure it is also protecting the assault of both post-pubescent females and pre-pubescent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If every adult man ever attracted to a post pubescent female under the age of 18 is now a pedophile, what are we going to call actual pedophiles?

So you’re going with the “it’s natural” argument.

I am suggesting there may be a distinction between actual pedophilia (attraction to biological pre-pubescent children) and attraction to females who have completed puberty and are physically women, whether they have reached 18 or not.

I’m not at all saying it’s a good thing. It’s gross, disgusting, and wrong due to power imbalance and exploitation, but it’s not pedophilia.

You are trying to make this look innocent. There’s a big difference between attraction and sex trafficking/raping. Everyone in Epstein’s orbit is the latter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Apparently the answer is that they are going send the national guard to Memphis’s in response to a murder in Utah.

Agree distraction. Fomenting violence whipping up crowds as we saw with J6, then pardoning the violent actors.

A truly, skilled leader can redirect into non-violent action. If they want to…. I have yet to see our current President demonstrate that capacity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If every adult man ever attracted to a post pubescent female under the age of 18 is now a pedophile, what are we going to call actual pedophiles?

So you’re going with the “it’s natural” argument.

I am suggesting there may be a distinction between actual pedophilia (attraction to biological pre-pubescent children) and attraction to females who have completed puberty and are physically women, whether they have reached 18 or not.

I’m not at all saying it’s a good thing. It’s gross, disgusting, and wrong due to power imbalance and exploitation, but it’s not pedophilia.

The GOP will protect both the attraction of post-pubescent and pedophilia version. And, GOP will go beyond protecting attraction, to ensure it is also protecting the assault of both post-pubescent females and pre-pubescent.

R’snare going to overcome it by continuing with the above blurring of decency.

How many in this administration have been accused or found guilty of assault?