Bingo. It's the same with Deal which is why parental opinions can vary so much. You can lose a core teacher and be stuck in a room with no math instruction (at all!) for 6 months. Or you can have a solid panel of great teachers in every subject. |
Agree with both of these. SO important right now to keep our kids' mental health front of mind. |
Perhaps. But which college? |
Or, for a high achieving self motivated kid who wants to load up on APs, it may be a poor choice if he ends up attracting the unwanted attention of a few bad actors, or if the hallways become a problem for the kid. I know a handful of kids who left because they each seem to draw all the bad luck. When it's good, it can be really, really good; but when it's bad, it is horrible. |
Same college they would have gone to from literally any school, public or private. The high school does not influence the college choices as much as people on here seem to think. That kid going to Harvard or MIT will get there from anywhere because it isn't what happened in high school that got them there in the first place. |
I simply cannot believe that any parent accepts any of this as OK. |
It's not a matter of getting in; the post I was referring to stated that these kids are "very prepared" for college. There is a big difference in excelling at Harvard or MIT, versus excelling at State U. I am not convinced that students who have such weak instruction in writing and languages will excel at top schools, at least initially. They will almost certainly be behind kids from other schools, who have had writing skills drilled into them. I am seeing that now with my college freshman who went to a local private. He has been told by more than one teacher this year that they can "tell he went to a good high school," simply because his writing skills are better than they often see. |
Because it’s one parents (biased) opinion and not the gospel truth. Many other posters on this thread saying the opposite. You take what you want from DCUM opinions. |
I don't think its ok, but there is still a strong chance my child will end up there. I am hoping for a better option but even for my well rounded almost straight A student I'm not sure what options we will have once all is said and done with applications, lottery etc. |
Again, the writing and language instruction is not weak for kids going to these top colleges...if at the least you believe that AP test score results mean anything. The JR kids getting into these top schools are taking 10+ APs and scoring 5s in most of them (recruited athletes aside...though the crew kids are usually doing well on APs). |
|
As a J-R parent of two (one of whom already graduate), writing is a weak spot. Even with APs, there simply wasn't a lot of emphasis on it. However, the history department is very good and they do emphasize writing and give good feedback.
My specific gripe is that they don't do a lot of long papers but perhaps taking AP Seminar and/or AP Research would help with that. |
| There are some good teachers, but the writing is weak and the big problem is that there is no discipline whatsoever. Daily fights, constant stealing from neighborhood businesses, constant cheating. I fear the students will grow up feeling they can get away with anything. |
| And the students are not all getting 5s on APs. Far from it. |
At what school are all the kids getting 5s on APs? The point is that there are plenty of classes that are challenging, many of which are in the social sciences and so have a decent amount of writing. I would also emphasize the extracurricular opportunities that are academic in nature and that have a strong writing component--the Beacon, mock trial, and debate. Is this the same as mandatory writing requirements that you would get in a private school? No. But they are pretty intensive and the feedback kids get (from faculty advisors and their peers) is excellent. |
The PP was referring to the JR kids getting accepted to the Top10 schools...not the general JR population. Again, 60% of JR students on average score 3 or higher. |