So they're doing 2 2 5 5 like thousands of other families? The kid gets to spend time with both of his parents,? Sounds awful. |
Given the wealth of the parents they probably have more than two homes and multiple bedrooms. And, with their money they can afford two sets of everything. It is far better than being taken away from one parent and that parent just being a visitor in the kids lives. Anything other than 50-50 sounds terrible for kids. |
hahahah! How many men are actually doing that? Men don't do half the work. (Well, maybe there's a FEW. But only a few.) |
My husband does half the work. Just because you had a kid with a dud does not mean all men are duds. Usually the men who are good fathers are still married. |
Exactly my point. Men who want to get divorced also typically don't want to do the difficult work of parenting. |
+1. |
Most men don't get the opportunity because their ex's want full custody for the child support. Mine would have been 1005 capable of taking care of his or our kids. I don't worry one bit if something happens to me. |
| Have you ever talked to an adult child of divorce about this? I have not, but as an ACOD myself I would have loved for my parents to have 50/50. My dad moved out of state so we got summers at his place and school years at my mom's place. It sucked. No matter where I was, I missed one of my parents terribly. |
This is not true. The vast majority of men get 50/50 when they ask for it. You have to be a really horrible father and your horribleness has to be well-documented for you to be denied 50/50. But women often get full custody because their exes don't ask for custody. |
As I have stated, at least in my state, 50/50 is 'presumed' in divorce/custody. That's what it will be unless the parents agree to deviate (which some do). Almost all families I know that are divorced do 50/50 and the dads seem to do what they are supposed to do. My ex does (and stop making me defend him haha). |
I really think this kind of arrangement should be outlawed and divorced parents should be required to live within an hour of each other until the child turns 18 |
Talk about something that will never be enforceable. |
Its very state specific and a mom can easily scream abuse even if there is none and get far more. |
How would that even work if a parent needs to move for employment? Or, if divorced one or both cannot afford to stay in the area. Even an hour distance would make it hard to see your kid a lot if you are working full time. |
| The simple solution to this is the parent who feels strongly that the kids should live in one home, should give up custody and just have every other week visitation. That solves the issue. |