Karl Frisch and the Stupidity of Dunn Loring ES

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ah, so Karl finally admits that this was all about placating his buddies who wanted to save the dog park at Blake Lane?

He reminds me of Sam Smith so much that I’m expecting him to open every School Board meeting now with a performance of “Unholy.”

Everyone around Blake Lane made abundantly clear they didn’t want the school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ah, so Karl finally admits that this was all about placating his buddies who wanted to save the dog park at Blake Lane?

He reminds me of Sam Smith so much that I’m expecting him to open every School Board meeting now with a performance of “Unholy.”

Everyone around Blake Lane made abundantly clear they didn’t want the school.

You are a liar, just like Karl.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Karl needs to fix his folly at Dunn Loring. Fairfax/Oakton needs the money intended for it back. The county is considering plans to allow 1200 housing units at the AT&T site at Jermantown and Chain Bridge and more housing where the office buildings are on Rosehaven/Arrowhead between Jermantown and 123 near Oak Marr Rec Center. Fairfax City also has proposed apartments and townhouse on Eagan near Chain Bridge.

+1000.

[Anonymous]

I wonder who would win if they had a contest for which current School Board member is most like George Santos.

[Anonymous]

There were 1215 petitions of Blake Lane residents asking the site not be made into a school.
https://www.ipetitions.com/petition/save-blake-lane-park

This was all going on before Karl got on the board. Everyone in the community was and still is opposed to building a school there. There were FCPS meetings in 2019 (before Karl was on the board) where there were 150+ people in opposition to the project.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ah, so Karl finally admits that this was all about placating his buddies who wanted to save the dog park at Blake Lane?

He reminds me of Sam Smith so much that I’m expecting him to open every School Board meeting now with a performance of “Unholy.”

Everyone around Blake Lane made abundantly clear they didn’t want the school.

You are a liar, just like Karl.

^Every accusation is a confession.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There were 1215 petitions of Blake Lane residents asking the site not be made into a school.
https://www.ipetitions.com/petition/save-blake-lane-park

This was all going on before Karl got on the board. Everyone in the community was and still is opposed to building a school there. There were FCPS meetings in 2019 (before Karl was on the board) where there were 150+ people in opposition to the project.

There is no verification that the signers of that petition weren’t repeat signatories or residents of the Fairfax/Oakton area. And the stated reasons for objecting to the Blake Lane site clearly included saving the dog park, which really isn’t something that should drive a School Board decision.

But, anyway, stop diverting, you clown. The issue ultimately isn’t whether a school should have been built at that site; it’s whether there was any compelling reason - which there is not - to then turn around and waste $60M of our money at Dunn Loring, where there is no need for a new school there. It is surrounded by at least four other under-enrolled schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ah, so Karl finally admits that this was all about placating his buddies who wanted to save the dog park at Blake Lane?

He reminds me of Sam Smith so much that I’m expecting him to open every School Board meeting now with a performance of “Unholy.”

Everyone around Blake Lane made abundantly clear they didn’t want the school.

You are a liar, just like Karl.

^Every accusation is a confession.

Is that what you told Pekarsky and Omeish when their text messages basically calling you dishonest were produced during the TJ litigation, Karl?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There were 1215 petitions of Blake Lane residents asking the site not be made into a school.
https://www.ipetitions.com/petition/save-blake-lane-park

This was all going on before Karl got on the board. Everyone in the community was and still is opposed to building a school there. There were FCPS meetings in 2019 (before Karl was on the board) where there were 150+ people in opposition to the project.

There is no verification that the signers of that petition weren’t repeat signatories or residents of the Fairfax/Oakton area. And the stated reasons for objecting to the Blake Lane site clearly included saving the dog park, which really isn’t something that should drive a School Board decision.

But, anyway, stop diverting, you clown. The issue ultimately isn’t whether a school should have been built at that site; it’s whether there was any compelling reason - which there is not - to then turn around and waste $60M of our money at Dunn Loring, where there is no need for a new school there. It is surrounded by at least four other under-enrolled schools.

If the school had been built at Blake Lane, you people would be crying about “KARL FRISCH DESTROYED A DOG PARK!!!”

The fact is the vast majority of that community did not want a school at that site. I don’t know why someone outside that neighborhood would have any interest in signing that petition, but if the petition alone doesn’t tell you enough, go rewatch the meetings from 2018-19 where there were literally hundreds of people speaking against the project and very few in favor. Just google “save Blake lane” and you’ll see all the media coverage

Elected officials are supposed to listen to the views of their community and the overwhelming majority of the community was opposed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ah, so Karl finally admits that this was all about placating his buddies who wanted to save the dog park at Blake Lane?

He reminds me of Sam Smith so much that I’m expecting him to open every School Board meeting now with a performance of “Unholy.”

Everyone around Blake Lane made abundantly clear they didn’t want the school.

You are a liar, just like Karl.

^Every accusation is a confession.

Is that what you told Pekarsky and Omeish when their text messages basically calling you dishonest were produced during the TJ litigation, Karl?

You are downright OBSESSED with him. Good thing he got the no gun zone ordinance passed administrative buildings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There were 1215 petitions of Blake Lane residents asking the site not be made into a school.
https://www.ipetitions.com/petition/save-blake-lane-park

This was all going on before Karl got on the board. Everyone in the community was and still is opposed to building a school there. There were FCPS meetings in 2019 (before Karl was on the board) where there were 150+ people in opposition to the project.

There is no verification that the signers of that petition weren’t repeat signatories or residents of the Fairfax/Oakton area. And the stated reasons for objecting to the Blake Lane site clearly included saving the dog park, which really isn’t something that should drive a School Board decision.

But, anyway, stop diverting, you clown. The issue ultimately isn’t whether a school should have been built at that site; it’s whether there was any compelling reason - which there is not - to then turn around and waste $60M of our money at Dunn Loring, where there is no need for a new school there. It is surrounded by at least four other under-enrolled schools.

If the school had been built at Blake Lane, you people would be crying about “KARL FRISCH DESTROYED A DOG PARK!!!”

The fact is the vast majority of that community did not want a school at that site. I don’t know why someone outside that neighborhood would have any interest in signing that petition, but if the petition alone doesn’t tell you enough, go rewatch the meetings from 2018-19 where there were literally hundreds of people speaking against the project and very few in favor. Just google “save Blake lane” and you’ll see all the media coverage

Elected officials are supposed to listen to the views of their community and the overwhelming majority of the community was opposed.

Why do you keep engaging in such deliberate obfuscation?

Let’s assume there were a lot of people in the vicinity of Blake Lane Park who wanted to preserve the dog park there.

That is still no reason to take money earmarked for a school in the Fairfax/Oakton area (not necessarily BLP) and divert it to a different area miles away to build a school that is clearly not needed. It is devious, it is wasteful, and it speaks to Frisch’s fundamental lack of brains or integrity. The only reason he got away with this BS is because the rest of the board is from the same political party and they weren’t paying attention. Shame on them as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ah, so Karl finally admits that this was all about placating his buddies who wanted to save the dog park at Blake Lane?

He reminds me of Sam Smith so much that I’m expecting him to open every School Board meeting now with a performance of “Unholy.”

Everyone around Blake Lane made abundantly clear they didn’t want the school.

You are a liar, just like Karl.

^Every accusation is a confession.

Is that what you told Pekarsky and Omeish when their text messages basically calling you dishonest were produced during the TJ litigation, Karl?

You are downright OBSESSED with him. Good thing he got the no gun zone ordinance passed administrative buildings.

No. You just don’t like it when your lies and half-truths are called out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every time you post in this and the other threads designed to bash all Dem SB members before the election, you just remind me to go vote (for them). So thanks! Clearly you haven't studied marketing tactics.

People have posted some compelling reasons why Dunn Loring ES is a big waste of money, to which Karl and his friends invariably respond with half-truths at best. If that's what you value in your candidates, go for it.

You should stop obsessing over Karl and this one issue...WTF. It's a big district with lots of students and families. Your passion for this one issue - Dunn Loring ES - over everything else the school district is and needs to accomplish, is weird and a red flag that you are not a great advocate for or against any candidate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Every time you post in this and the other threads designed to bash all Dem SB members before the election, you just remind me to go vote (for them). So thanks! Clearly you haven't studied marketing tactics.

+1
How many impressionable voters do you think read these threads? For god's sake, school board election picks are THANKFULLY not decided on DCUM.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ah, so Karl finally admits that this was all about placating his buddies who wanted to save the dog park at Blake Lane?

He reminds me of Sam Smith so much that I’m expecting him to open every School Board meeting now with a performance of “Unholy.”

Everyone around Blake Lane made abundantly clear they didn’t want the school.

You are a liar, just like Karl.

^Every accusation is a confession.

Is that what you told Pekarsky and Omeish when their text messages basically calling you dishonest were produced during the TJ litigation, Karl?

You are downright OBSESSED with him. Good thing he got the no gun zone ordinance passed administrative buildings.

No. You just don’t like it when your lies and half-truths are called out.