+1 It’s not all about the ROI. |
Not saying my kid would or wouldn’t get in. Kid has SAT scores and grades and ECs to put them in the “has a shot” category. Odds are against anyone getting in. But my kid won’t be applying because, what is the point? We were not get aid, with the possible exception of Princeton. |
I think you can get the same (or better) advantage from an Ivy League grad school though. I went to a top 3 law school, and there were more students coming from state schools and lower ranked liberal arts colleges in my law school class than there were from Ivy League undergrads. And many of those students were entering law school with a lot less student loan debt. If you have to fund a $90k/yr undergrad with all student loans, it does leave you saddled with a lot of debt for a long time, especially if you then load grad school debt on top of it. |
As an ETHS grad, I find this hilarious (and I’m sure the NTHS grad OP is horrified). The demographics in Evanston are much closer to those in Arlington than the New Trier demographics. The NT district is notoriously white and wealthy. |
I was curious so I looked, and the online information I found was New Trier is 75% white and Niche has avg income at $250k. Yorktown is 62% and $230k. I think New Trier could be more like one Arlington and Evanston could be more like another Arlington. |
The whole point of my post is that kids can be successful wherever they go. And, yes, not everyone defines success the same way. You working in public service doesn’t somehow make you more successful than some one doing a job they love with significant compensation. Your post comes off as a classic Ivy Leaguer, like you are somehow better because you went to Ivy and you are now doing so much good in the world!!! I am a state school booster. I think UVA and Tech are great. Surely you aren’t naïve enough to think that the posters on this thread saying that you are only happy with UVA because your kid can’t get into an Ivy believe that a low income from public sector work is the desired outcome of an Ivy education. |
Your defensiveness caused you to miss the point I was making. Let’s try again. As I said in my post, “smart kids do well wherever they go.” I think it’s great that your kids went to in state schools. I loved my experience and it has served me well. Your over the top reaction (pretty defensive for being so content with your choices) looks like you really wanted to send them to an Ivy, but had to settle for in state. That’s the real difference between us - I don’t think that an Ivy League education makes you special. You don’t need to convince me that your kids are thriving. |
I think you are right for some grad schools — particularly law and med but wrong for others. ,lI am thinking of grad schools like education at Columbia or divinity at Yale or the accounting thing at Columbia. Great grad programs for sure but I don’t think you get the same value as say HLS. Business school is a bit on the fence for me. Clearly you can by helped by Harvard and Wharton but I’m not so convinced that business school at Columbia or Cornell gets you a whole lot more than Princeton undergrad. Bottom line: for me your post is true for some kids but for other kids undergrad still matters. There are other benefits of an undergrad ivy-like education which I would acknowledge but aren’t relevant to your post about cache. |
Do agree that smart kids can succeed anywhere. Don’t agree with much of anything else in your original post. Most of which you’ve conveniently omitted here. You claimed people’s ivy league degrees had diminished value because they didn’t make enough money to send all their kids to Ivy League. We pointed out that some people CHOOSE jobs that pay less than private sector because it is what they want to do. No one said we were better. We just said we didn’t judge the value of our degree by whether we could afford a second home. You clearly do. But suffice it to say that we have different views about what it means to be happy and successful and also different views about the value of a good education. We’ll have to agree to disagree. |
My dentist went to Harvard undergrad. I've never understood why it is such a big deal. I'm sure he's smart and I know he makes a ton of money but I don't think there was any special sauce there. |
+1 I actually don't judge the value of my Ivy degree by the outcome at all, whether it be prestigious public service or high income. It was most valuable to me because of the education I received there and the experience I had, which was not just the professors/classes, but was also due to the amazing peer group I was with. I think you can get a great education and outcomes at lots of other colleges, but I still appreciate the experience that I had. |
Unless you went into a very lucrative field, or did an incredible job of saving for tuition, the massive increase in tuition costs has put the Ivies out of reach for most Ivy League grads. |
+1 |
+1 Maybe they don't want their kids to risk rejection, and therefore tarnish their own self-image as successful, highly educated, wealthy parents....you know...in case Johnny's friend does get accepted. |
Not exactly following your point. Are you saying it is the connections you had from your Ivy school that got you those jobs, or the name of the school on your resume? And you really don't think your previous work experiences helped with subsequent hires? I agree the name recognition is helpful, particularly upon graduation and entering the workforce. But the point is that others who graduate from lesser-known schools end up being comparably successful in the long-run. That's why the comment is that the benefits - or advantages - are "short-lived." |