Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We live in a neighborhood that is a really close community and people go all out with the inflatable lawn decorations and so forth. We have watched Halloween change in our neighborhood over the past eight years or so. It went from being a local neighborhood party where you saw your friends' kids, caught up with old friends, and occasionally offered them a beer -- to being a big "free candy festival" for up to 300 people from outside the neighborhood. Things that we used to do in the neighborhood -- giving little kids a ride in a golf cart, the big kids setting up little tricks to scare the smaller kids, the big kids dressing up like zombies, the parents dressing up -- all of this has changed now that it's no longer a neighborhood event. We get massive amounts of traffic -- the lazy ass parents who trail the kids in a minivan and won't get out of the car, and most years I've been annoyed because if I have to drop one of my kids off at a Halloween party at a friend's house outside the neighborhood, I actually spend time in traffic in my neighborhood waiting to get back to my house.
And lately, we've had kids not only visiting at Halloween but showing up later soliciting funds for their school teams, trying to sell us stuff for their school fundraiser, etc. I concur with the poster who said that they chose a family-friendly neighborhood and chose to spend the money for that neighborhood. THe principle is called free-riding, folks. If you drop your kids off at my door, but there is no intention of reciprocity, then you're a user.
I buy your kid's stupid fundraisers, and you buy my kid's scout cookies, etc. It's a trade-off. Tit for tat. Just showing up and expecting things is not that. I think the original letter writer was correct when she said that it was actually a form of charity -- in which you take but don't give back. I agree with her. I pay taxes, I buy extra school supplies and backpacks for kids in September, I buy someone a turkey at Thanksgiving, Christmas, I buy extra Christmas gifts for someone else's child, I pack backpacks so kids have lunch on weekends if they get a free school lunch, I donate to Habitat for Humanity -- does everything in America need to be about redistribution? Why can't Halloween just be a neighborhood event? That doesn't seem unreasonable to me.
Um..
maybe some parents bring their kids over because it's safer 'round the affluent areas. Maybe they don't feel safe walking or driving around their neighborhoods. Maybe in their low income 'hoods not many people participate in giving out candy. I invited an acquaintance with their kids over to my more affluent area because in their area, there aren't very many kids, so it's not as much fun. We have since moved out of the area, but they have gone back to that area during Halloween. I think it's great that they can do that. I think it's great that here, in the US, we can freely move around, for the most part.
So, because you donate to charity throughout the year you want just this one event to be neighborhood only, even though this event is celebrated by the entire country, for the most part. I know, put a sign out that says "for my affluent neighbors only." Good luck with that.