NP. All politics aside: I'd guess they cannot turn over unrelated documents on other clients because it violates their contracts with those other clients to protect privacy. If they turn over other unrelated client's documents without a fight, it also will mean no one ever hires them again in the future. |
I find it more problematic that Congressmen are demanding records completely unrelated to the dossier, Russia, and/or the 2016 election. There is zero reason for agents of the government to be shaking down a private company for records on unrelated matters. This is what happens in China or Russia; we don't act this way in the United States of America. |
We do when information points to that private company working with a presidential candidate to take down another. |
I bet there's a whole basket of moles. This administration leaks and has no loyalty or discipline. |
There's nothing wrong with one presidential candidate taking down another, that's what campaigns do. What's wrong is a candidate colluding with a foreign enemy to take down another candidate. That's what traitors do. |
But it's fine for that now President to not have to disclose his taxes? You think the bigger issue here is that a private company worked with one candidate to bring down another, and not that a presidential candidate may have colluded with a foreign power to reveal ill gotten emails from one of our political organizations, or that our POTUS has the potential to be blackmailed? Seriously? If a person has cancer, and a huge pimple on his nose, is going after the pimple more important than the cancer because you can see the pimple but not the cancer? |
There probably were tapes, and TrumpCon, Inc., destroyed them. More obstruction of justice. TrumpCon, Inc., is known for destroying records requested by people suing him. No reason for him to change his ways now. |
Did Fusion GPS actually meet with Veselnitskaya? By one account, someone from Fusion GPS was merely in the same courtroom as Veselnitskaya at the same time along with a hundred other people, they weren't even near each other and there were even photos of the seated attendees to show that. "Showed up for the same hearing" doesn't necessarily mean "meet." |
Simpson was with her at the hearing, hours before she met with Don Jr. And, met with her after. Kind of sounds like a set up to me. |
Why did they not show when they were invited to testify publicly? They chose not to testify. Why did Fusion GPS partners Peter Fritsch and Thomas Catán invoke the 5th at the House panel? They wanted a closed door hearing. They got it. If they had wanted the testimony to be public, they should have testified publicly when they had the chance. https://www.politico.com/story/2017/07/13/co-founder-of-firm-behind-trump-russia-dossier-will-not-testify-before-senate-next-week-240525 http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/08/politics/house-intelligence-committee-fusion-gps-strike-deal/index.html |
Do you know what isn't a set up?
Hundreds of millions of launder money through Trump and Kushner accounts. Meetings with Russians from 2013 to the present. Lying about said meetings. PapaD and Flynn pleading guilty to charges. Indictments to Manafort and Gates. The dossier doesn't mean much for anything legally as it relates to Trump and Russia. |
Because they needed to get clarification on what documents needed to be produced and the line of questioning. They didn't want to be forced to disclose their client list or violate their disclosures with their clients. Stop reading Breitbart. |
https://www.google.com/amp/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN1D937W Simpson met with the Russian lawyer twice. And the information that Veseiniyskaya offered Don Jr. supposedly came from Fusion GPS. |
Do you also conclude, from Trump's failure to make his tax returns public as promised, that he has something to hide? |
Same thing goes for the Deutsche bank records. Nothing to hide, nothing to fear from turning them over. |