H5N1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here is where I will start worrying:

If there are multiple, simultaneous reports of human infections with H5N1 following exposure to birds or other animals, or identification of spread from one infected person to another.

No, not until someone younger than 60 dies.

Are we really doing this eugenicist BS again? Gross

Yes, really gross!! The first few years of retirement are the best years of adult life for many, enjoying free time and grandkids before health concerns settle in. But for posters like this, since they are no longer valuable contributors to business, it doesn't matter if they are killed?

And btw, pandemic influenza often favors (kills off) a (much) younger cohort than seasonal influenza.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here is where I will start worrying:

If there are multiple, simultaneous reports of human infections with H5N1 following exposure to birds or other animals, or identification of spread from one infected person to another.

No, not until someone younger than 60 dies.

Are we really doing this eugenicist BS again? Gross

Yes, really gross!! The first few years of retirement are the best years of adult life for many, enjoying free time and grandkids before health concerns settle in. But for posters like this, since they are no longer valuable contributors to business, it doesn't matter if they are killed?

And btw, pandemic influenza often favors (kills off) a (much) younger cohort than seasonal influenza.

No, it's because they're no longer valuable contributors to society. They just consume resources and take up space. I guess that can be good for businesses, but bad for everyone else.

[Anonymous]

And if you really want to be a drain on society into your 60s, 70s, and beyond, then I suppose that's your right. But don't expect everyone else to go out of their way to help you survive long enough to do that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here is where I will start worrying:

If there are multiple, simultaneous reports of human infections with H5N1 following exposure to birds or other animals, or identification of spread from one infected person to another.

No, not until someone younger than 60 dies.

Are we really doing this eugenicist BS again? Gross

Yes, really gross!! The first few years of retirement are the best years of adult life for many, enjoying free time and grandkids before health concerns settle in. But for posters like this, since they are no longer valuable contributors to business, it doesn't matter if they are killed?

And btw, pandemic influenza often favors (kills off) a (much) younger cohort than seasonal influenza.

No, it's because they're no longer valuable contributors to society. They just consume resources and take up space. I guess that can be good for businesses, but bad for everyone else.

This is true, because the older folk have generally more immunity to strains of the flu than younger folk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here is where I will start worrying:

If there are multiple, simultaneous reports of human infections with H5N1 following exposure to birds or other animals, or identification of spread from one infected person to another.

No, not until someone younger than 60 dies.

Are we really doing this eugenicist BS again? Gross

Yes, really gross!! The first few years of retirement are the best years of adult life for many, enjoying free time and grandkids before health concerns settle in. But for posters like this, since they are no longer valuable contributors to business, it doesn't matter if they are killed?

And btw, pandemic influenza often favors (kills off) a (much) younger cohort than seasonal influenza.

No, it's because they're no longer valuable contributors to society. They just consume resources and take up space. I guess that can be good for businesses, but bad for everyone else.

This is true, because the older folk have generally more immunity to strains of the flu than younger folk.

And btw, pandemic influenza often favors (kills off) a (much) younger cohort than seasonal influenza.


To clarify, this is true

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We need an immediate lockdown for two weeks. Except for airplane travel.

And mostly peaceful protests.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here is where I will start worrying:

If there are multiple, simultaneous reports of human infections with H5N1 following exposure to birds or other animals, or identification of spread from one infected person to another.

No, not until someone younger than 60 dies.

Are we really doing this eugenicist BS again? Gross

DP. I think this is poorly phrased but the point is, if you're under 60, you probably don't PERSONALLY need to worry about H5N1 unless it seems to be killing people outside the groups who we already know are more vulnerable to the flu.

I will take this moment to remind people that H1N1 did affect younger adults and children back in 2007.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And if you really want to be a drain on society into your 60s, 70s, and beyond, then I suppose that's your right. But don't expect everyone else to go out of their way to help you survive long enough to do that.

Speak for yourself, cretin. I have no problem helping others.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We should be worried. However, I deeply hope it takes out a significant amount of anti vaxers and trump supporters. Fingers crossed. I'm stocking up on food, TP, fuel and bleach this week too.

+1
Given they died at a 50% higher rate during covid, well you know the dumbass crowd will again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And if you really want to be a drain on society into your 60s, 70s, and beyond, then I suppose that's your right. But don't expect everyone else to go out of their way to help you survive long enough to do that.

Speak for yourself, cretin. I have no problem helping others.

And if you had any useful skills or physical abilities, perhaps you would. But instead you're just taking up space.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here is where I will start worrying:

If there are multiple, simultaneous reports of human infections with H5N1 following exposure to birds or other animals, or identification of spread from one infected person to another.

No, not until someone younger than 60 dies.

Are we really doing this eugenicist BS again? Gross

DP. I think this is poorly phrased but the point is, if you're under 60, you probably don't PERSONALLY need to worry about H5N1 unless it seems to be killing people outside the groups who we already know are more vulnerable to the flu.

I will take this moment to remind people that H1N1 did affect younger adults and children back in 2007.

And I think we can all agree it would be better if this one predominantly takes out the elderly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And if you really want to be a drain on society into your 60s, 70s, and beyond, then I suppose that's your right. But don't expect everyone else to go out of their way to help you survive long enough to do that.

It's wrong to describe Congress that way.

[Anonymous]

The best thing that could happen for the benefit of the rest of the species on this planet would be for a much more contagious and deadly pandemic than covid19 to come along and wipe out a very large portion of the human population.

Sorry but that is true. And the way we mess with nature and especially our husbandry of domestic animals we are doing everything possible to help nature make it happen to us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And if you really want to be a drain on society into your 60s, 70s, and beyond, then I suppose that's your right. But don't expect everyone else to go out of their way to help you survive long enough to do that.

It's wrong to describe Congress that way.

It's generous. We shouldn't let anyone over 50 even serve in Congress. They won't be alive long enough to feel the full impact of their decisions, which is the only thing that explains their actions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The best thing that could happen for the benefit of the rest of the species on this planet would be for a much more contagious and deadly pandemic than covid19 to come along and wipe out a very large portion of the human population.

Sorry but that is true. And the way we mess with nature and especially our husbandry of domestic animals we are doing everything possible to help nature make it happen to us.

Agree.
We will do ourselves in, rightfully so