Looks like Alter of MSNBC and a female co-worker of his are jumping on the bullying bandwagon. Alter said he was disinvited to a dinner when he said something the administration considered unflattering against the President. His female colleague asked some tough questions and got an email from the administration that used words I don't want to repeat here.
Curiouser and curiouser. |
The President should not be singling out ANY news organization in this manner. |
Yes no one should question hive mind. Must not think, must follow dictates of republicans. Watch fox.
Signed political correct thought police. |
One should digest all news sources. |
Really?
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/22/AR2005112201784.html
Singled out Al Jazeera. |
Last I checked, al-Jazeera wasn't a US organization and therefore doesn't have the same Constitutional rights that US News organizations have. If the report is credible, we were actively at war and Al Jazeera behaves in a manner that can be construed as compromising US troops. Furthermore, al-Jazeera was not bombed and Obama continues to denigrate Fox News and conservative journalists/pundits. And he wonders why he gets no respect from conservatives? Please! |
"The Daily Mirror report was attributed to two anonymous sources describing a classified document they said contained a transcript of the two leaders' talk. One source is quoted as saying Bush's alleged remark concerning the network's headquarters in Qatar was "humorous, not serious," while the other said, "Bush was deadly serious."
Sounds tenuous at best.... |
OK so you don't have to believe that to believe the rest of the article, (a) that the administration considered it a conduit for terrorist propaganda, and that this concern was strong enough to ask the CIA to find ways to neutralize it. Even if they didn't actually do it, the bias is FAR more serious than anything alleged of Barack Obama. |
Gee, I don't think a news organization should be paying millions of dollars to the politicians they cover. But hey, that's just me. If Fox News, by the checks it writes, proves that it is biased, why is Obama obligated to maintain the fiction that it is in fact neutral? |
Because he is President and took the oath of office to uphold the Constitution, including the first Amendment? |
Ofcourse he thiks and acts as if he is only President of democratic party. |
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Oh....I see your point........not. |
You think that Fox News has a constitutional right to interview the President? Really, you don't think that dozens upon dozens of news organizations get snubbed / never once in their existence get access to the WH Press room? Give it a rest. Conservatives really want a constitutional right to be liked. Well your momma can't make the other kids play with you, and neither can the Bill of Rights. You have a right to say what you want. The constitution cannot compel everyone to talk to you, and it can't prevent people from thinking you are douchebags. |
No need in the case of Fox. It's already been digested, had excess water removed while passing through the lower intestine, and has been pinched out the other end. |