BOB WOODWARD: Obama Is Showing 'A Kind Of Madness I Haven't Seen In A Long Time'

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ofcourse he thiks and acts as if he is only President of democratic party.

Translation: He won't flatter my wingnut prejudices and pursue far-right policies that I prefer.

You lost. He's your President. Get over it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ofcourse he thiks and acts as if he is only President of democratic party.

Translation: He won't flatter my wingnut prejudices and pursue far-right policies that I prefer.

You lost. He's your President. Get over it.

What have you won?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ofcourse he thiks and acts as if he is only President of democratic party.

Translation: He won't flatter my wingnut prejudices and pursue far-right policies that I prefer.

You lost. He's your President. Get over it.

What have you won?

Our candidate got elected President. Are you confused?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ofcourse he thiks and acts as if he is only President of democratic party.

Translation: He won't flatter my wingnut prejudices and pursue far-right policies that I prefer.

You lost. He's your President. Get over it.

What have you won?

Our candidate got elected President. Are you confused?

No. I'm asking you what you actually won when that happened and what you expect to win?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ofcourse he thiks and acts as if he is only President of democratic party.

Translation: He won't flatter my wingnut prejudices and pursue far-right policies that I prefer.

You lost. He's your President. Get over it.

What have you won?

Our candidate got elected President. Are you confused?

No. I'm asking you what you actually won when that happened and what you expect to win?

A veto over wingnuttery.

BTW think of what you already won. The last Republican candidate for President was going to undo the sequester. But in 2013 logic, Republicans like the sequester. So you an be thankful for that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares what Ezra Klein thinks... He's a nobody .

Ezra Klein is one of the more worthwhile commentators. The guy really knows policy inside and out. Always worth hearing what he has to say.

Rock on, Ezra!

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares what Ezra Klein thinks... He's a nobody .

Ezra Klein is one of the more worthwhile commentators. The guy really knows policy inside and out. Always worth hearing what he has to say.

Rock on, Ezra!

+1

Who the f is Ezra ? Sounds like a grain cereal at whole foods.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares what Ezra Klein thinks... He's a nobody .

Ezra Klein is one of the more worthwhile commentators. The guy really knows policy inside and out. Always worth hearing what he has to say.

Rock on, Ezra!

+1

Who the f is Ezra ? Sounds like a grain cereal at whole foods.

And you wonder why wingnuts don't know anything.

PP, go back to watching Fox & Friends. We'll wake you when Matlock comes on.

[Anonymous]

And you wonder why wingnuts don't know anything.

PP, go back to watching Fox & Friends. We'll wake you when Matlock comes on.

That you, Ezra?

[takoma]

I removed my response to an old message when I realized I was looking at an old page. My apologies.

It's great to be signed on!