John Eastman memo to Pence

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This strategy was discussed at length right here on DCUM.
Not a shock.
Not surprising.
Now imagine the republicans getting more nut jobs further up that food chain. Where they won’t balk at antics like this.
Truly a handful of people stood in the way of the demise of democracy. Unlikely they will be there next time.

True that. This plan was being discussed in real time and we were told it was just fear mongering.

I was told that when I said I thought Trump was going to find a way to stay in power. I have been told that when I've predicted that that at least one swing state in 2024 will invalidate the results of the popular vote for the Dem for President and certify the Republican electors.

I'm not really sure at what point this is addressed head on with Republicans. I think we may already be past the point where it will matter.

We are only past the point because Merrick Garland is a massive failure.

We have laws they broke the law this definitely proves that not to mention all of Trump's other items like his recent letter to Brad Raffensburger.

We have no accountability because Merrick Garland stinks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing to see here. It didn't happen. Sourcing is suspect. Dont be hysterical. Both sides do it. Milley committed treason. Biden is old. Free the political prisoners. Did I miss anything?

You are kidding right?

National Review has already vetted this. Yeah your magazine of traitors vetted this item.

Try again.

John Eastman should at the very least be disbarred.

Yes they tried a coup luckily they failed. Next time they won't and you will be in bread lines. Trumpets are so stupid. Be careful what you wish for moron. Better yet leave the US you hate it here.

Pretty sure PP is being sarcastic/mocking typical right wing reaction.

[Anonymous]

Jeez, Eastman, you're not supposed to write this stuff down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A couple of small picture thoughts while I gather my big picture thoughts:

A ) Mike Lee is totally getting a Trumpy primary opponent out of this
B ) There is NOTHING that Woodward won’t sit on until his book is published. This would have been really useful for the Senate removal vote after the second impeachment

Let’s be honest, it wouldn’t have made a difference in the second impeachment. Trump himself could have been a witness in the 2nd impeachment and told the step by step his plans for the coup and the vast majority of R’s would have voted in favor of him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A couple of small picture thoughts while I gather my big picture thoughts:

A ) Mike Lee is totally getting a Trumpy primary opponent out of this
B ) There is NOTHING that Woodward won’t sit on until his book is published. This would have been really useful for the Senate removal vote after the second impeachment

Let’s be honest, it wouldn’t have made a difference in the second impeachment. Trump himself could have been a witness in the 2nd impeachment and told the step by step his plans for the coup and the vast majority of R’s would have voted in favor of him.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A couple of small picture thoughts while I gather my big picture thoughts:

A ) Mike Lee is totally getting a Trumpy primary opponent out of this
B ) There is NOTHING that Woodward won’t sit on until his book is published. This would have been really useful for the Senate removal vote after the second impeachment

Let’s be honest, it wouldn’t have made a difference in the second impeachment. Trump himself could have been a witness in the 2nd impeachment and told the step by step his plans for the coup and the vast majority of R’s would have voted in favor of him.

+1

Yeah. I'm the PP that said this is jaw-dropping but I'm not sure it matters. I don't think Merrick Garland charging people with crimes would make a difference either.

The GOP isn't really a political party anymore. It's a populist movement and doesn't intend to be constrained by law, procedure, or norms.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing to see here. It didn't happen. Sourcing is suspect. Dont be hysterical. Both sides do it. Milley committed treason. Biden is old. Free the political prisoners. Did I miss anything?

You are kidding right?

National Review has already vetted this. Yeah your magazine of traitors vetted this item.

Try again.

John Eastman should at the very least be disbarred.

Yes they tried a coup luckily they failed. Next time they won't and you will be in bread lines. Trumpets are so stupid. Be careful what you wish for moron. Better yet leave the US you hate it here.

Umm. PP. You might want to go to bed. You totally missed the point. To the first poster - I think you most of the common excuses but I am sure some of our friends will show up here spins and provide us with some you have missed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing to see here. It didn't happen. Sourcing is suspect. Dont be hysterical. Both sides do it. Milley committed treason. Biden is old. Free the political prisoners. Did I miss anything?

You are kidding right?

National Review has already vetted this. Yeah your magazine of traitors vetted this item.

Try again.

John Eastman should at the very least be disbarred.

Yes they tried a coup luckily they failed. Next time they won't and you will be in bread lines. Trumpets are so stupid. Be careful what you wish for moron. Better yet leave the US you hate it here.

Coomunist, BLM, Antifa. False flag. You just dont like his style. Racism against white people. Just asking questions. What, can't you take a joke? Satanist, pedophile, babykiller. Biden is the President now.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing to see here. It didn't happen. Sourcing is suspect. Dont be hysterical. Both sides do it. Milley committed treason. Biden is old. Free the political prisoners. Did I miss anything?

You are kidding right?

National Review has already vetted this. Yeah your magazine of traitors vetted this item.

Try again.

John Eastman should at the very least be disbarred.

Yes they tried a coup luckily they failed. Next time they won't and you will be in bread lines. Trumpets are so stupid. Be careful what you wish for moron. Better yet leave the US you hate it here.

Umm. PP. You might want to go to bed. You totally missed the point. To the first poster - I think you most of the common excuses but I am sure some of our friends will show up here spins and provide us with some you have missed.

Not till their Russian talking points (via good old fashioned American conservative radio and TV) arrive. Then they move as one. One creepy, seditious body.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A couple of small picture thoughts while I gather my big picture thoughts:

A ) Mike Lee is totally getting a Trumpy primary opponent out of this
B ) There is NOTHING that Woodward won’t sit on until his book is published. This would have been really useful for the Senate removal vote after the second impeachment

Let’s be honest, it wouldn’t have made a difference in the second impeachment. Trump himself could have been a witness in the 2nd impeachment and told the step by step his plans for the coup and the vast majority of R’s would have voted in favor of him.

+1

Yeah. I'm the PP that said this is jaw-dropping but I'm not sure it matters. I don't think Merrick Garland charging people with crimes would make a difference either.

The GOP isn't really a political party anymore. It's a populist movement and doesn't intend to be constrained by law, procedure, or norms.

“Populist” still has connotations of hard jawed, straight thinking, honest people who just buck the system. They’re not that. The GOP has never been that. Call them authoritarian or fascist, but they left “populism” in the dust.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing to see here. It didn't happen. Sourcing is suspect. Dont be hysterical. Both sides do it. Milley committed treason. Biden is old. Free the political prisoners. Did I miss anything?

You are kidding right?

National Review has already vetted this. Yeah your magazine of traitors vetted this item.

Try again.

John Eastman should at the very least be disbarred.

Yes they tried a coup luckily they failed. Next time they won't and you will be in bread lines. Trumpets are so stupid. Be careful what you wish for moron. Better yet leave the US you hate it here.

Coomunist, BLM, Antifa. False flag. You just dont like his style. Racism against white people. Just asking questions. What, can't you take a joke? Satanist, pedophile, babykiller. Biden is the President now.

Excellent right wing rap. You should be in every thread like the poster who used to write in trump’s creepy voice. Hope to see more of you.

[Anonymous]

The Mike Lee revelations are very interesting and add a whole new light on the Tuberville calls on Jan 6th. Now we know that Lee knew exactly what Trump and Rudy were asking for and why they dialed him first. What was the thing Lee got hysterical about during the trial?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Ah yes how could I possibly go to bed without Maggie Haberman apologizing for Trump yet again. The world is back on its orbit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Mike Lee revelations are very interesting and add a whole new light on the Tuberville calls on Jan 6th. Now we know that Lee knew exactly what Trump and Rudy were asking for and why they dialed him first. What was the thing Lee got hysterical about during the trial?

YES I had forgotten about that. It was during the House presentation and then cam up during the vote about whether there would be witnesses and it was pretty clear that he would have to be a witness. Thread from BITD - (note, this seems like it was two years ago)