You lack reading comprehension. |
No problem comprehending how Seth Adams continually lies to parents. That's very clear. |
WJ cluster reps are organizing to advocate at the County Council for the reinstatement of the Auditorium at Woodward.
You can reach the entire council through this link: https://www2.montgomerycountymd.gov/CCL_ContactForms/ContactCouncil.aspx |
What's their argument on where the money should come from? |
The argument is that the proposed boundary study draws from 36% of the county and that they should not set a precedent for inequitable distribution of arts facilities |
A well run business would not constantly be pulling the rug out from under the man! A pp accused him of lying, but it is not lying when you have to respond to changing circumstances. And no, I am not Mr. Adams or his mother. |
I'm not sure if/where you draw a distinction, unless you are just reporting the proper title (I said he was running capital improvements where you note Director of Construction -- tomAto/tomAHto). He definitely was shaping the whole Woodward-Northwood thing well prior to initial BOE approvals. Agree about moving parts and MCPS comms problems. |
DP. Not Seth or a relation, either, but I did make the 04/13/2024 20:41 post in response to someone posting that he was incompetent. To clarify for the poster who thinks I was heaping praise on Seth, it was, at best, a backhanded compliment. He is very good at his job, just not very good for us -- he gets done what MCPS upper leadership wants within what the MoCo County Council will afford. Unfortunately, those are not what we want or wish they would afford (and they are poor stewards of our interests in that regard). As for lying, yes, he lies by omission, significantly and knowingly so in interactions with the community stakeholders of prospective projects. Some holding back often is necessary to provide room to evaluate and adjust. His penchant is to go beyond that, providing different slices of that which is known to different sub-groups of stakeholders, denying them, individually or as a group, effective agency that they otherwise might have if well informed in a timely manner. That said, if he didn't, he wouldn't be able to do what he does, and that is part of the game in a politically charged arena. He's far from the worst in MCPS upper leadership with this -- I've seen bald-faced lies from some, not just to community members, but to the BOE, as well. And, to your point about rug-pulling, the challenges are real. The County Council has underfunded MCPS for a very long time. Covid and its aftermath threw a wrench in things. MCPS fails even to consider more holistic and long-term facilities planning that might allow not only more efficient use of funds, but also more creative approaches to address community need, though that is hard when constantly underfunded. Still, he's well compensated to be the one to address such challenges. It's not the compensation I mind, however; it's the lack of consideration. We all have failings, I suppose... |
MCPS is making huge budget cut in lots of areas so this isn't surprising. What is obnoxious are the BOE just moved their offices and got all new furniture/remodeled the space and yet, they scream poverty. Their priorities are messed up and those folks need to go. We need a full line by line audit and cut out the waste and then there will be funding for things like this. |
DP. Capital Planning is one division, Construction is another, both within Facilities Management. |
Can we reinstate developer impact taxes yet? |
Think of Capital Planning, at least then, as more financial management/accounting. Definitely involved in feasibility, site selection, etc., but more the 30,000-foot level. Broader. Think of Construction (was or became "Planning and Construction" -- not sure when -- indicating a fuller scope), again, at least then, as more engineering/project management. The technical approach, configuration options, scheduling, etc., for a capital improvement. More focused, and also involved in the evaluation of facility conditions, given the nature of their personnel's expertise. They needed to work together, of course, with considerations of the one dictating limits on the other, and vice versa. And they had to work with other central offices, like transportation, as things progressed. School administrations, too, of course, though there was variable effectiveness in each administrator's advocacy for their community and definite, if unclear, limits as to that which they could influence. And it is, ultimately, on Jack Smith and Monifa McKnight -- the buck stopped there. Intimating, however, that Seth wasn't responsible for some of the things folks are voicing about Woodward and Northwood because he was the Division Director for Construction (instead of Capital Planning or in charge of all of Facilities back at the inception of ) misrepresents his role. His facility with communication also saw him more often the lead with stakeholders where there was overlap, and was, I expect, among the reasons for his eventual selection to lead the whole department. That year-past promotion was titular (Director to Associate Superintendent, but both of Facilities; probably to rank him more appropriately in relation to his administrative peers and provide a salary bump), as he'd been in charge of all of Facilities for a while before that. |
But, but...then the developers will all go build in Montana instead of MoCo! Especially smaller, local operators that would build "missing middle" housing (which shouldn't be beholden to silly notions of adequate school capacity). Crisis, here, people! Crisis! (And taxes bad! Taxes BAAAAD...) |
Seth Adams plays a political game to please his superiors. You shouldn’t work for a school district if you don’t give a damn about kids |
MCPS would never play their bs games with wealthy schools like Whitman or Churchill. They would be too scared of the parent pushback. It is disgusting how MCPS claims to be all about equity but screws over their lower income student population |