Please don’t ban TikTok

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:IT'S NOT A BAN! It forces Bytedance to divest from TikTok and prevents the Chinese Communist Party from accessing the data of Americans.


I have the right to watch any content I'd like. Honestly, I'd rather have the Chinese government have my data than the US government at this point.


You are so messed up. That is a downright crazy thing to say.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:IT'S NOT A BAN! It forces Bytedance to divest from TikTok and prevents the Chinese Communist Party from accessing the data of Americans.


I have the right to watch any content I'd like. Honestly, I'd rather have the Chinese government have my data than the US government at this point.


You are so messed up. That is a downright crazy thing to say.


+1
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:


Data point #2,730,224 that the GOP is basically owned and being blackmailed by China and Russia into doing their bidding.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Congress wants to ban TikTok, I am not sure what will be able to do without it. Please don’t take my TikTok away. I email my congressman and he emailed me this

“ hank you for contacting me with your concerns regarding the recent developments surrounding social media platform TikTok and the RESTRICT Act. I appreciate your concern, and your views are important to me.

The time has come for Congress to finally enact legislation to protect data privacy. Unregulated data collection and use in the United States has eroded public trust in foreign and domestic companies and their ability to safeguard and use data responsibly. Irresponsible data practices lead to a broad range of harms, most concerningly loss of individuals' control over personal information. Misusing this technology through personal software applications can have devastating effects on individuals' privacy and U.S. national security. Personal identifiable information (PII), including location and other sensitive data, must be protected against unlawful interference by third parties without the users' knowledge. Many companies engage in data collection, analysis, and sale, and in recent years, certain companies have abused the information they have accumulated, constituting gross violations of personal privacy, and I am committed to ensuring all Americans have a codified and unalienable right to privacy.

Outside the private sector, I have repeatedly opposed authorization of intelligence and surveillance programs that do not guard against such abuses during my tenure in Congress. I proudly opposed sweeping reauthorizations of the Patriot Act and voted against the FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act and the USA FREEDOM Reauthorization Act.

I applaud the Biden Administration's holistic approach to cybersecurity that seeks to ensure the safety and security of every American in the digital sphere. In the 21st century, it is vital that we provide strong, proactive leadership on behalf of the federal government to ensure the digital safety of everyday Americans.

As you may know, certain provisions of the Restricting the Emergence of Security Threats that Risk Information and Communications Technology Act, commonly referred to as the RESTRICT Act, direct the Department of Commerce to create a framework to assess and mitigate foreign threats to the information and communications technology (ICT) products and services used by social media platforms. If a social media platform or foreign technology service is found to pose a threat to vital economic and national security interests, the RESTRICT Act gives the Secretary of Commerce the discretion to impose mitigation efforts, up to and including a ban of the platform.

While much public attention has been focused on the content-creation and sharing app TikTok and the RESTRICT Act's ability to ban social media platforms, there has been little emphasis on other forms of ICT products, such as anti-virus software, telecommunication networks, and other types of malignant software which potentially poses a risk to U.S. national security. These risks, which have been embedded in our critical infrastructure, have the ability to compromise our interests and must still be addressed. It is important that any steps or actions taken to specifically mitigate the threats posed on U.S. national security can adequately respond and adapt to the highly complex threat landscape we face today, and any such actions taken do not infringe upon the rights of citizens under the first amendment.

As a Member of Congress, it is essential that I know my constituents' thoughts and concerns so I can best represent their interests in Congress. I will continue to watch this issue closely and support legislation and Congressional efforts to protect our nation's security, as well as the privacy, civil liberties, and legal rights of all Americans citizens regardless of their creed, race, or color.

Once again, thank you for expressing your concern on this very important issue. I enjoyed hearing from you. For official statements and more information on my views on other issues, please feel free to visit my website at http://connolly.house.gov and sign up for my email newsletters. You can also follow me on Facebook and Twitter for real-time updates on my work in Congress and the 11th District. If I may ever be of service, please do not hesitate to contact me.@
I just hope it doesn’t get banned. I spend 4 hours a day on this app they can’t banned it.



Op I could not read past your first sentence: why can’t you live without it?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Congress wants to ban TikTok, I am not sure what will be able to do without it. Please don’t take my TikTok away. I email my congressman and he emailed me this

“ hank you for contacting me with your concerns regarding the recent developments surrounding social media platform TikTok and the RESTRICT Act. I appreciate your concern, and your views are important to me.

The time has come for Congress to finally enact legislation to protect data privacy. Unregulated data collection and use in the United States has eroded public trust in foreign and domestic companies and their ability to safeguard and use data responsibly. Irresponsible data practices lead to a broad range of harms, most concerningly loss of individuals' control over personal information. Misusing this technology through personal software applications can have devastating effects on individuals' privacy and U.S. national security. Personal identifiable information (PII), including location and other sensitive data, must be protected against unlawful interference by third parties without the users' knowledge. Many companies engage in data collection, analysis, and sale, and in recent years, certain companies have abused the information they have accumulated, constituting gross violations of personal privacy, and I am committed to ensuring all Americans have a codified and unalienable right to privacy.

Outside the private sector, I have repeatedly opposed authorization of intelligence and surveillance programs that do not guard against such abuses during my tenure in Congress. I proudly opposed sweeping reauthorizations of the Patriot Act and voted against the FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act and the USA FREEDOM Reauthorization Act.

I applaud the Biden Administration's holistic approach to cybersecurity that seeks to ensure the safety and security of every American in the digital sphere. In the 21st century, it is vital that we provide strong, proactive leadership on behalf of the federal government to ensure the digital safety of everyday Americans.

As you may know, certain provisions of the Restricting the Emergence of Security Threats that Risk Information and Communications Technology Act, commonly referred to as the RESTRICT Act, direct the Department of Commerce to create a framework to assess and mitigate foreign threats to the information and communications technology (ICT) products and services used by social media platforms. If a social media platform or foreign technology service is found to pose a threat to vital economic and national security interests, the RESTRICT Act gives the Secretary of Commerce the discretion to impose mitigation efforts, up to and including a ban of the platform.

While much public attention has been focused on the content-creation and sharing app TikTok and the RESTRICT Act's ability to ban social media platforms, there has been little emphasis on other forms of ICT products, such as anti-virus software, telecommunication networks, and other types of malignant software which potentially poses a risk to U.S. national security. These risks, which have been embedded in our critical infrastructure, have the ability to compromise our interests and must still be addressed. It is important that any steps or actions taken to specifically mitigate the threats posed on U.S. national security can adequately respond and adapt to the highly complex threat landscape we face today, and any such actions taken do not infringe upon the rights of citizens under the first amendment.

As a Member of Congress, it is essential that I know my constituents' thoughts and concerns so I can best represent their interests in Congress. I will continue to watch this issue closely and support legislation and Congressional efforts to protect our nation's security, as well as the privacy, civil liberties, and legal rights of all Americans citizens regardless of their creed, race, or color.

Once again, thank you for expressing your concern on this very important issue. I enjoyed hearing from you. For official statements and more information on my views on other issues, please feel free to visit my website at http://connolly.house.gov and sign up for my email newsletters. You can also follow me on Facebook and Twitter for real-time updates on my work in Congress and the 11th District. If I may ever be of service, please do not hesitate to contact me.@
I just hope it doesn’t get banned. I spend 4 hours a day on this app they can’t banned it.



Op I could not read past your first sentence: why can’t you live without it?

Crickets. But if you really want to know, read Blood Money. It’s all explained in great detail.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:TikTok needs to stop spying. TikTok needs to be transparent. TikTok needs to sever ties with the Chinese government.


Like I told my congressman. IDC what they do with my face, I really don't care if they sell T-shrts with my face.


That's not all they are doing. They are harvesting your contact list, tracking your movements, reading your browsing history, your text messages and so on.

So does Google and Facebook. Should they be banned too?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Why exactly are Trump and the GOP now pro-TikTok? They say: 1. First amendment 2. Can’t take investors’ property.

Translation: money.

What else can it be?


They are pro Free Speech.
China can ban US website and social media because it is pro Censorship, a dictatorship.
We are a Free Speech country.
You can hate the speech but you have to allow it.

Trump realized how power can be abused to censor speech when he was banned from social media.
He knows that allowing congress to ban TikTok will open the door for his own social media platform to be banned. This is how dictatorships operate.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:IT'S NOT A BAN! It forces Bytedance to divest from TikTok and prevents the Chinese Communist Party from accessing the data of Americans.


I have the right to watch any content I'd like. Honestly, I'd rather have the Chinese government have my data than the US government at this point.


You are so messed up. That is a downright crazy thing to say.


Not crazy at all. Aren’t you aware about the mass surveillance in the US by the NSA? The US government is spying on its own citizens.
At least the Chinese are open about their surveillance programs.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:IT'S NOT A BAN! It forces Bytedance to divest from TikTok and prevents the Chinese Communist Party from accessing the data of Americans.


I have the right to watch any content I'd like. Honestly, I'd rather have the Chinese government have my data than the US government at this point.


You are so messed up. That is a downright crazy thing to say.


Agree.

PP is off her rocker to say what she said.

Ban TikTok; it is a spy tool.
Anonymous

Chinese Communist control is the issue here.

Anonymous
TIKTOK HAS DONE NOTHING TO STOP RAMPANT ANTISEMITISM ON ITS PLATFORM.

If the new rise of Nazism isn’t something to shout about, I don’t know what is.

Ban TikTok! Do not give Nazis a platform for their hate!!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why exactly are Trump and the GOP now pro-TikTok? They say: 1. First amendment 2. Can’t take investors’ property.

Translation: money.

What else can it be?


They are pro Free Speech.
China can ban US website and social media because it is pro Censorship, a dictatorship.
We are a Free Speech country.
You can hate the speech but you have to allow it.

Trump realized how power can be abused to censor speech when he was banned from social media.
He knows that allowing congress to ban TikTok will open the door for his own social media platform to be banned. This is how dictatorships operate.



BS. Trump is absolutely 100% transactional; he doesn't burp without some financial motivation.
Anonymous
Fight for your right to state-backed propaganda kids!!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:TIKTOK HAS DONE NOTHING TO STOP RAMPANT ANTISEMITISM ON ITS PLATFORM.

If the new rise of Nazism isn’t something to shout about, I don’t know what is.

Ban TikTok! Do not give Nazis a platform for their hate!!



They choose what gets amplified. Their algorithm is used to destabilize nations. They absolutely are responsible for the antisemitism.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: