DCUM Weblog

Last month I wrote a post about the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, allegedly a humanitarian project aimed at providing food aid to the starving Palestinians of Gaza. At that time I was very skeptical of the operation and predicted that it would fail to be a successful provider of food assistance. After weeks of operation, the GHF has proven to be an even bigger failure than I had expected. The organization is undoubtedly causing the deaths of more people than it is saving.

As a review, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation was only created in February of this year, largely by Americans. As a new organization, it obviously had no track record of delivering aid, let alone in an environment as difficult as Gaza. Moreover, its model for food delivery was almost exactly the opposite of that used by traditional humanitarian organizations. The GHF's plan was to open a very small number of aid hubs located some distance from the populations that they planned to serve. Traditionally, aid organizations prefer to open many small distribution centers close to populations in need. Critics, including me, predicted that the GHF plan would result in Gazans being forced to travel long distances — trips that would be impossible for many — and result in large crowds that would likely get out of hand. Moreover, there were concerns that the Israeli military would take advantage of these hubs to further abuse the Palestinians. All of these predictions have come true.

Yesterday, two separate interviews with the U.S. Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, were published in which he suggested that there has been a radical change in the U.S. policy regarding Israel and the Palestinians. In one interview, published by Bloomberg, Huckabee was asked if the United States continues to support a two-state solution to the conflict. In response, Huckabee was quoted as saying, "I don’t think so". In a second interview, this one with the BBC, Huckabee again played down support for a two-state solution, calling it an "an aspirational goal". Huckabee's remarks call into question the long-standing position of the United States that the Israel-Palestine conflict should be resolved by the creation of a Palestinian state in the occupied West Bank and Gaza.

Today I am going to provide an update regarding Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the Maryland father who was arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement while driving his son home from his grandmother's house and subsequently sent — in violation of a court order — to El Salvador's Terrorism Confinement Center or CECOT. There have been a number of developments since I last wrote about Abrego Garcia, the most important of which is that he has been returned to the United States and charged with two felonies related to transporting undocumented migrants from Texas to other parts of the country.

I am continuing to follow this case because I believe that it is an almost perfect representation of the dishonesty, incompetence, and sheer mendacity of the administration of cult leader, convicted felon, and failed President Donald Trump. Many times this administration's actions warrant questioning of whether they are the result of malice or incompetence. With this administration, we can almost always ensure ourselves that it was both. I quoted now-suspended ABC News correspondent Terry Moran yesterday and will do so again today. For that matter, I may do so every day for the foreseeable future. His description of Trump and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller as “world-class haters” is one of the most accurate characterizations of this duo. It says a lot about the state of the U.S. media that stating the truth is grounds for suspension. If you doubt Moran's characterization, the plight of Abrego Garcia is a good demonstration of the lengths to which Trump and Miller will go due to their loathing of migrants.

This weekend I was thinking a lot about protests. A big reason for this was the considerable coverage in my social media feeds of two very different protests. In the Mediterranean Sea, a group of peace activists, including Greta Thunberg, was attempting to break the Israeli blockade of Gaza and deliver food and medical supplies to the starving Palestinians. Meanwhile, in Los Angeles, activists took to the streets to protest arrests by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement service. While these protests had little in common, the reaction to them did have some similarities. In both cases, authorities intentionally escalated events and, also in both cases, the protesters were criticized for having laudable goals but employing the wrong tactics. This follows an ongoing trend in which authorities appear less willing to tolerate even the most mild forms of protest and protesters are advised to adopt tactics that cause little, if any, disruption.

I was all set to write about a very serious and very important topic today, but I've put it on the back burner because I simply cannot stop myself from addressing the fight between cult leader, convicted felon, and failed President Donald Trump and Shadow President Elon Musk. At the same time, I am going to address financial and economic topics that are somewhat outside my area of expertise. The poster who constantly accuses me of writing about things that I don't understand will probably have a field day today. Nevertheless, dumb as I am, I have a proposed solution that will be good for Trump, good for Musk, and good for the country.

First, for those who spent yesterday in a cave and missed the Trump-Musk cage match, it actually started in late May before Musk had officially left his White House job as a Special Government Employee. Referring to the One Big Beautiful Bill, as the reconciliation act has been officially named, Musk told CBS Sunday Morning that "I was disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not just decreases it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing." His remark was mostly either ignored or shrugged off by Trump and other Republicans. Then, on Tuesday, Musk tweeted his disgust with the spending bill saying, "I’m sorry, but I just can’t stand it anymore" and that "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination." Musk concluded by writing, "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." Yesterday, Musk went even further, telling his X followers to contact their Senators and Congressional representatives and tell them to "KILL the BILL".

Today I am going to provide updates on some of the stories about which I've been writing. First, there was an important development in the case of Venezuelan men renditioned to El Salvador's Terrorism Confinement Center or CECOT after cult leader, convicted felon, and failed President Donald Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act. This update involves the Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, James Boasberg. Those who have been following this case will know that Boasberg is the O.G. judge when it comes to the AEA. Boasberg was presiding over an attempt to stop the original AEA removals while planes destined for El Salvador were literally sitting on airport runways. During that hearing, he issued an order from the bench stopping the men from being sent to El Salvador. Government officials ignored the order, saying that they were waiting until it was put in writing. By the time Boasberg's written order was released, the government claimed that the airplanes were outside his jurisdiction. Boasberg has started contempt procedures as a result, though his ruling has been stayed by the Court of Appeals. 

Recently, Shadow President Elon Musk announced that he was stepping back from politics. As I wrote last month, Musk had reached the 130-day statutory limitation on his appointment as a Special Government Employee and, as such, had no choice but to end his official involvement. However, it is very likely that Musk will remain involved in government behind the scenes. His government service has been far too lucrative for him to step back completely. Recently, the office of Senator Elizabeth Warren published a 12-page report titled, "Special Interests over the Public Interest: Elon Musk’s 130 Days in the Trump Administration," that lists 130 bullet points detailing ways in which Musk benefited from his government service.

In the past couple of years, the meaning of "antisemitism" has been redefined. Historically, "antisemitism" referred to prejudice towards or hatred of Jews. Since the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, however, "antisemitism" has come to mean anything that is pro-Palestinian or anti-Israel. As protests erupted on college and university campuses across the United States, students chanting "Free Palestine" or "From the River to the Sea" have been accused of being antisemitic. This despite the fact that many of those among the protesters were themselves Jewish. Nevertheless, the administration of cult leader, convicted felon, and failed President Donald Trump has seized upon the alleged antisemitism — which is really just anti-Zionist or anti-Israeli speech — to justify a crackdown on universities and foreign students. In one of the most egregious examples, Rümeysa Öztürk was seized off a public street by a group of individuals — several of whom were masked — and forced into an unmarked vehicle. What happened to Öztürk was indistinguishable from a kidnapping. Eventually, Öztürk was moved to a detention center in Louisiana, where she spent weeks in very difficult circumstances. Her "crime"? She coauthored an op-ed for her college's newspaper criticizing the university's policy regarding Israel’s genocide in Gaza. Per the Trump administration's preferred definition of "antisemitism", this was antisemitic.

Today I am going to write about something about which I know very little. Yeah, yeah, I can hear you all asking what makes this different from any other day. Well, today I am even less informed than normal. However, if you are like me, your social media feeds have been filled with discussion of the so-called abundance agenda. As far as I can tell, this all started with a book written by Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson named, not surprisingly, "Abundance". While the book is a "New York Times Bestseller", I have not read it and I'm unlikely to do so. But, based on the summaries with which I have been inundated on social media, it seems that Klein and Thompson argue that liberals have used regulations to prevent development rather than to promote beneficial development. They propose a new agenda aimed at streamlining regulations to deliver infrastructure and things like affordable housing quicker and cheaper. I want to explain why I believe this is the wrong argument at the wrong time and then discuss one aspect of the abundance agenda.

I think that most of us know that the reconciliation bill recently passed by the U.S. House of Representatives has a significant number of bad provisions. The bill contains massive tax cuts for the wealthy, which will add trillions of dollars to the national debt. It cuts Medicare and Medicaid and weakens Obamacare. The bill also increases funding for the military and the border patrol. But a must-pass bill of more than 1,000 pages, much of which was drafted in the final hours before passage and approved in the middle of the night with few Members of Congress having been able to read it, is ripe for exploitation. Such a bill is a prime candidate to be used for hiding provisions that may be unpopular and which would never pass on their own accord. The "Big Beautiful Bill", as the reconciliation act is named, is just such legislation, and exactly that has happened with it. Hidden away amidst the pages about tax cuts and defense spending increases is a provision that would protect government officials from the consequences of ignoring court decisions.