Trump: A Whole Civilization will Die Tonight

by Jeff Steele — last modified Apr 07, 2026 12:17 PM

As the saying goes, when you elect a clown, you get a circus. Only the circus created by cult leader, convicted felon, and failed President Donald Trump is deadly. The reality TV star will have us all gathered around to watch his show this evening, exactly as he wants it.

By any objective measure, the United States appears to be led by a genocidal maniac. That cult leader, convicted felon, and failed President Donald Trump is a narcissist who is suffering from significant cognitive decline should be obvious to anyone. Now our mad king is threatening to wipe out Iranian civilization. For those who have not yet seen it, here is a "truth" that Trump posted on Truth Social this morning:

A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again. I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will. However, now that we have Complete and Total Regime Change, where different, smarter, and less radicalized minds prevail, maybe something revolutionarily wonderful can happen, WHO KNOWS? We will find out tonight, one of the most important moments in the long and complex history of the World. 47 years of extortion, corruption, and death, will finally end. God Bless the Great People of Iran!

Previously, Trump has talked about destroying Iran's bridges and power plants. Now he is threatening the country's entire civilization. I doubt that Trump has any awareness of the fact, but pride in Persian civilization is one thing that unites almost all Iranians. Iranians are generally quick to tell you that their civilization is 3,000 years or more old and that while Europe was in the Stone Ages, Persian civilization was thriving. Trump could hardly have concocted a more persuasive method of coalescing Iranians in opposition to the U.S. war efforts if he had specifically attempted to do so.

Moreover, to many, Trump's threat is perfectly believable. In recent days, U.S. and Israeli forces have bombed multiple Iranian universities. Ancient cultural centers have been bombed and damaged. Yesterday, Israel destroyed a synagogue in Tehran. Some irony there, I guess. These attacks make clear that Iran's civilization is already under attack. Why wouldn't Trump finish the job?

There are several ways to view Trump's post. The most obvious is that it is simply a negotiating ploy and not something that he actually intends to do. Trump is, of course, famous for "TACOing" when it comes time to implement his threats. This seems to be the hope of several Republicans. Republican Senator Ron Johnson, for instance, appeared on CNN this morning and said:

I am hoping and praying that President Trump is, that this really is bluster. I do not want to see us start blowing up civilian infrastructure. I do not want to see that. We are not at war with the Iranian people. We are trying to liberate them.

Others, such as Republican Congressman Mike Lawler, tried to ignore Trump's plain language and attempted to argue that Trump actually didn't mean what he said. Lawler told CNN that he doesn't support "making a whole civilization die" but that "I don't think we're talking about ending a civilization...It's their energy and civilian infrastructure."

According to Lawler, Trump only intends to knock out Iran's bridges, power plants, and energy production facilities, something that is, apparently, acceptable. Whereas wiping out Iran's civilization is not.

Some have interpreted Trump's post as a threat to use nuclear weapons. As unthinkable as this may be to most of us, the unfortunate truth is that such an action cannot be ruled out. In 2016, during Trump's first term, MSNBC's Joe Scarborough reported that:

Several months ago, a foreign policy expert on the international level went to advise Donald Trump. And three times [Trump] asked about the use of nuclear weapons. Three times he asked at one point if we had them why can’t we use them.

A year later, Politico reported that:

The Trump administration is considering proposing smaller, more tactical nuclear weapons that would cause less damage than traditional thermonuclear bombs — a move that would give military commanders more options but could also make the use of atomic arms more likely.

The same article quoted Andrew Weber, who served as assistant secretary of Defense responsible for nuclear policy in the Obama administration, as saying that the U.S. already has smaller nuclear weapons. Therefore, it is likely that there are nuclear options available to Trump should he choose to use them.

Of course, employing a nuclear weapon would have so many negative ramifications associated with it that it doesn't seem possible that even Trump is insane enough to do it. Moreover, as I wrote yesterday, destroying Iran's civilization — or even its bridges and power plants — regardless of whether that is done with nuclear or conventional weapons, would not actually help Trump achieve his goals. As long as the current Iranian regime remains in power, it will consider itself to be winning the war.

There is one exception to this that occurred to me, however. There are several indications that Trump is looking for an off-ramp for the war. Conventional thinking is that he would simply cut a deal with the Iranians, even one that strongly favored the current regime, and then act like it was a great victory. The problem for Trump is, again as I wrote yesterday, that, regardless of Trump's ability to spin an Iranian victory as a loss, his Gulf allies will not be satisfied if Iran is left in control of the Strait of Hormuz. Trump may see the solution as ending the war on a big bang. In other words, with no true victory in sight, Trump can cause enough destruction to Iran to impress the Gulf leaders to whom Trump is personally beholden for many billions of dollars. Trump and the Gulf Arabs might believe that an Iran that has been so weakened would be amenable to an acceptable deal involving the strait. If so, such arrangements could be concluded without U.S. involvement. If this theory is correct, Trump may see the widespread destruction of Iranian infrastructure as his way out of the war.

There are plenty of ways such a plan could go wrong. Most obviously, Iran could wreak its own wide-scale destruction on its Arab neighbors as well as Israel. As such, the most likely outcome remains Trump TACOing, perhaps with a fig leaf of negotiations. But I remain fearful that Trump's narcissism and desire to become a world historic figure will lead him to unthinkable acts.

Certainly, the Iranians have seen enough of Trump to know that giving into his bullying will only result in additional bullying. Everything that we have seen from them suggests that they have no intention of caving in. On the other hand, if the Iranians can achieve their goals through negotiations, Trump could be the ideal mark for them.

The bottom line is that none of us know what will happen at 8 p.m. tonight, and Trump himself may not be sure. The sad thing is that Trump has roped us into his reality show. We will all be watching the clock this evening and then checking to see what happens when it strikes 8. There is nothing that could thrill Trump more than that he has nearly the entire world captivated by his actions. It is truly an embarrassment for the United States that we have come to be defined by this foolish egomaniac.

HandsomeJimmy says:
Apr 07, 2026 12:42 PM
What's the incentive to accepting a ceasefire for the Iranian??

We had a nuclear deal with inspections from the IAEA and we tore it up.

We negotiated with them twicr and in in the middle of the negotiations attacked them.

They know any ceasefire deal will just get broken the following year.

This is the issue.
Jeff Steele says:
Apr 07, 2026 12:47 PM
I don't think they will accept a ceasefire except as part of an overall end to the war.
Not an MD, but… says:
Apr 07, 2026 01:49 PM
He probably is insane — or at least, not competent— by commonly accepted medical guidelines. He’s certainly “a danger to self or others” — a point where inpatient hospitalization, including involuntary inpatient hospitalization would be considered.
I truly don’t get the people who are around him who are more competent, or at least not clearly dealing with dementia, who are complicit in supporting this destructive madness. That includes any medical professional who has encouraged Trump in recent days/weeks/ months/and even years, ignored his deterioration and danger to others - including threats — and failed to protect the public as well as the specific targets that Trump has repeatedly threatened.
Anonymous says:
Apr 07, 2026 10:51 PM
The idea that Trump has dementia is honestly wishful thinking. In what way does the simple explanation that Trump's megalomania, in the vein of the dictators of all the world history, escalates his ambitions, and in each ambition, he simply uses the same crude but effective bluster, lying and entertainment strategy he has used throughout his second but also first terms and throughout his life?

Trump will keep escalating as long as he can and he is dangerous not because he is demented but because he is getting bored. Tariffs were not exciting, arresting dictators was exciting. Getting more oil. Controlling real estate on an unprecedented scale. He has always been an alien to me, but only a fool calls him a doddering old man. Did you see/hear any of the press conference yesterday? He was on point and running the room just fine. He's around for the time being so the waiting game isn't going to be enough.
Not an MD, but… says:
Apr 08, 2026 12:43 AM
Trump is evil. He has had lifelong antisocial personality characteristics. He’s racist. He also has publicly and consistently shown signs of some sort of progressive dementia. The quality of his language and thought processes have deteriorated quite a bit. Watch an interview of him pre-Apprentice. Listen to him raving now — with lots of repetitions, neologisms, very simple sentences, and misused words. Ignoring the evident deterioration, including a decrease in his already meager impulse control and judgement means counting on capacities that simply are not there.
I’ve no desire to convince or even educate someone who just called me a fool. Others, though, might want some clarity regarding who and what we are dealing with.
Add comment

You can add a comment by filling out the form below. Plain text formatting. Web and email addresses are transformed into clickable links. Comments are moderated.