The Creation of DOGE

by Jeff Steele — last modified Feb 21, 2025 10:40 AM

Today I am starting something different with this blog. At least for a while, I am going to stop writing about DCUM threads and, instead, discuss developments in the U.S. Government.

Today I am going to do something different with this blog, which may or may not become a trend. I've decided that as important as threads about soccer, Blake Lively, and college admissions might be, we are living in a time that demands something more. I may not have much of a voice, but what little voice I do have, I want to use for something more important. While I still have the freedom to write whatever I want, I am going to exercise it. Instead of writing about DCUM threads, I am going to discuss the current political situation in the United States, particularly where it involves the autocratic tendencies of cult leader, convicted felon, and failed President Donald Trump and Shadow President Elon Musk. Today, I am going to discuss the Department of Government Efficiency.

The idea of Musk leading an effort to cut costs in government and improve government efficiency first came up during an August conversation between Musk and Trump that was live-streamed on Musk's social media network X. Then, on August 19, 2024, Musk posted an AI-generated picture of himself standing behind a lectern labeled "The Department of Government Efficiency" and "D.O.G.E.". Musk captioned the graphic, "I am willing to serve". Those familiar with Musk immediately recognized that the name fit Musk's style of addressing serious topics in a juvenile and trolling manner. "Doge" began as an Internet meme, and a cryptocurrency named Dogecoin was later created as a joke making fun of speculative cryptocurrencies. Musk became a champion of both the Doge meme and Dogecoin, which, despite its origin as a joke, became a serious player in the crypto market. Dogecoin owed almost all of its success — if you can call it that — to Musk's promotion of it on Twitter and later X. In typical Musk fashion, "Doge" is not something that he came up with himself but rather something that he has essentially snatched control of from its creators. Regardless of all of that, three weeks after their conversation, Trump said that he would create a government efficiency commission and place Musk in charge. Then, on January 20, the day of his inauguration, Trump signed an Executive Order establishing the Department of Government Efficiency.

There are a number of aspects of the Executive Order that are worth mentioning. Most importantly, a government department cannot be created by an EO. Rather, that requires an act of Congress. Perhaps in recognition of this, the EO renamed the United States Digital Service — an existing organization created during the administration of former President Barack Obama to work on digital projects such as the healthcare.gov website — to the United States DOGE Service (USDS). Within the USDS, the EO also created the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization. Perhaps the most notable aspect of the EO was the description of the mission of USDS, which was "Modernizing Federal Technology and Software to Maximize Efficiency and Productivity". This is a very different task than what DOGE has been undertaking.

On February 11, Trump signed a second Executive Order titled, "Implementing the President’s ‘Department Of Government Efficiency’ Workforce Optimization Initiative". This EO gave DOGE team leaders within government agencies significant control over hiring and reductions in force. No attempt appears to have been made to reconcile the scope of this EO with that of the original EO that created DOGE. Moreover, many of the actions taken by DOGE are well outside the scope of even the second EO. For instance, DOGE stopped the distribution of almost all U.S. foreign assistance and attempted to close the U.S. Agency for International Development. Both of these actions have been halted by federal judges, as have many of DOGE's efforts. However, Trump and Musk have simply ignored the courts.

While Trump has been saying since August that Musk would lead DOGE and has frequently talked about Musk's activities with DOGE, the White House now says that Musk has no official connection to DOGE. Earlier this week, a White House official in a court filing said that Musk works for the White House as a non-career special government employee serving as a "Senior Advisor to the President" and has no authority to make government decisions. The court filing specifically denied that Musk is the administrator of the DOGE or even works for the organization. This, of course, contradicts everything that we have been led to believe since Trump signed the EO creating DOGE. Musk clearly has considerable authority over DOGE, the question is what authorizes that authority? DOGE is filled with former employees of Musk's companies and other associates of his, and Musk routinely takes credit for DOGE's actions. The White House is caught in a contradictory position. It either lied to the Court or Musk has been taking actions for which he is not authorized. Of course, both could be, and probably are, true. Regardless of the veracity of the White House's court filing, Musk has clearly been acting unlawfully. It is not surprising, therefore, that Courts have repeatedly intervened to stop DOGE's moves. Ironically, despite Musk's repeated support for government transparency, we still don't know the identity of the official administrator of DOGE.

Through DOGE, Elon Musk has essentially seized control of the U.S. government. This, despite claims by the White House that Musk has no real authority beyond being able to offer advice and has no official role in DOGE. DOGE itself exists on questionable legal ground, and many of its actions are currently tied up in legal processes. Nevertheless, DOGE's actions have disrupted the lives of hundreds of thousands of federal employees, cut off money to a broad swath of federal programs, and disrupted government services, both large and small. I will be writing more about DOGE in coming days.

Someone says:
Feb 21, 2025 11:50 AM
This is the most clear explanation I’ve seen of these crazy times. Thank you and keep it up.
Anonymous says:
Feb 21, 2025 12:36 PM
I am so here for this. Thank you, Jeff.
Mom says:
Feb 21, 2025 01:15 PM
Small correction on paragraphs starting "The idea of Musk leading an effort" - says executive order creat August 20 on inauguration so I believe should be January 20? Thx for your insight!
Jeff Steele says:
Feb 21, 2025 01:17 PM
Yes, of course. Thanks for catching that.
Anonymous says:
Feb 21, 2025 01:38 PM
The most important question is why is a self centered narcissist like Trump letting Musk get away with so much? Trump loves to portray he is in power but that extremely odd conference press conference in the Oval Office depicted otherwise. Clearly Musk has something over Trump. I’m guessing Musk paid off Trump’s debts. It seems it goes beyond campaign financing.
Jeff Steele says:
Feb 21, 2025 01:39 PM
This is one of the topics about which I'll be writing in coming days.
Patriot says:
Feb 24, 2025 10:55 AM
I also wonder about this. Typically there can only be one narcissist in the room. HUGE male egos don't get along and I am surprised that Trump hasn't tired of Musk hogging the spotlight. I do think that now as you have more egos added to the situation with Trump's cabinet and heads of departments there will be more pushback against Musk as we are seeing with the 5 bullet point email.
Anonymous says:
Feb 21, 2025 02:18 PM
Thank you for doing this. Appreciate you standing up and speaking out in a clear, thoughtful, and fact-based way.
Apple says:
Feb 21, 2025 02:27 PM
Great idea, thanks !
Anon says:
Feb 21, 2025 04:50 PM
And DOGE will also be dabbling in regulatory review, see https://www.whitehouse.gov/[…]/ !
Linus says:
Feb 21, 2025 07:33 PM
Appreciate you.
D’Arcy Kemnitz says:
Feb 21, 2025 07:49 PM
TTHISSS should be the front page - and to be nostalgic shall I add “above the fold” - of the New York Times. Whatever happened to real journalism?
Anonymous says:
Feb 21, 2025 07:53 PM
Thank you. We need everyone with a platform to speak up.
Anonymous says:
Feb 21, 2025 08:54 PM
Thank you for using your platform to speak truth to power.
Sonja says:
Feb 21, 2025 09:30 PM
Jeff, don’t underestimate your power!! Thank you so much for this.
Anonymous says:
Feb 21, 2025 09:32 PM
Thank you Jeff
Anonymous says:
Feb 21, 2025 10:22 PM
Thank you. I appreciate you taking time to use your voice in a meaningful way that’s easy for all to quickly understand. Looking forward to more of these posts!
Anonymous says:
Feb 21, 2025 10:27 PM
Thank you for this clear explanation!
Anonymous says:
Feb 21, 2025 10:55 PM
THANK YOU!
Anonymous says:
Feb 21, 2025 10:56 PM
Thank you!
Anonymous says:
Feb 22, 2025 03:31 AM
Thank you for this, Jeff
Anonymous says:
Feb 22, 2025 08:16 AM
Thanks Jeff! Please keep it up. Your efforts are appreciated!!
Anonymous fed says:
Feb 22, 2025 08:38 AM
Excellent summary. Thank you.
Anonymous says:
Feb 22, 2025 12:25 PM
This is needed. Thank you.
Anonymous says:
Feb 22, 2025 12:59 PM
I’m curious to hear your thoughts. “While I still have the freedom to write whatever I want” was a bit chilling to read. Thanks for doing this.
Anonymous says:
Feb 22, 2025 10:40 PM
My same feeling, we need to be wide-eyed about what’s going on and where we’re headed if people don’t speak up. Thank you Jeff.
Val says:
Feb 22, 2025 04:41 PM
Hear hear! Look forward to reading more such posts!!
Anon says:
Feb 22, 2025 06:39 PM
Thank for using your voice to report what's happening, and please keep doing so!
Anon says:
Feb 22, 2025 07:59 PM
Appreciate the new turn and looking forward to more to come.
Amomynous says:
Feb 22, 2025 08:54 PM
This is great, thanks! If I never hear or see a reference to Blake Lively again it will be too soon.
JS says:
Feb 23, 2025 08:44 AM
Thanks, Jeff! Great clear explanation. These are scary times and none of us should be complacent.
Anon says:
Feb 23, 2025 10:15 AM
Thanks Jeff, you are the best! Might I recommend you just refer to Trump as Fotus - for Felon of the United States? might save your fingers some work.
Anon says:
Feb 23, 2025 02:54 PM
Have I been banned?
Jeff Steele says:
Feb 23, 2025 03:27 PM
I don't know. What makes you think that you were?
Different Anon says:
Feb 23, 2025 06:45 PM
Just a guess, they probably aren't used to commenting on the blog post and were caught off-guard when a prior submission didn't appear right away.
Anon says:
Feb 23, 2025 03:38 PM
This is great - thank you for sharing
Anonymous says:
Feb 23, 2025 04:04 PM
Love it!
Anonymous says:
Feb 23, 2025 04:55 PM
Thank you
Anonymous says:
Feb 23, 2025 09:01 PM
Thank you! Keep it coming!! Without a law background, it is hard to make sense of everything that feels so wrong. Your efforts are appreciated.
Anonymous says:
Feb 23, 2025 09:51 PM
Thank you for explaining everything so clearly!
Anon says:
Feb 24, 2025 10:01 AM
This is a great use of your platform. Thank you for the clear summary, and I look forward to reading more.
Me says:
Feb 25, 2025 04:47 AM
Thanks for using your platform for this
Add comment

You can add a comment by filling out the form below. Plain text formatting. Web and email addresses are transformed into clickable links. Comments are moderated.