Sorry typo I meant who can afford $15 per kid |
|
I think adding $3-5 extra for an infant is reasonable. Parent here. |
Thanks for sharing. |
So? Then you should have thought about ALL the costs of a child prior to having a child. Nannies should be paid appropriately and $15/hr to care for more than one child is ridiculous. Two children are twice as much work, three are triple work. She should be paid appropriately. |
$5 extra is what I charge. |
If I asked to be paid per child, would my pay decrease when one of the kids starts kindergarten? |
Depends on the circumstances. If I'm on call to bring things to school, pick up a sick/misbehaving child, doing the child's laundry (and possibly packing their lunch) and I'm with them on all non-school days? I get the same rate. If someone else is going to do all of that, the child is no longer my charge, so I expect to drop to a lower rate. |
Pay per child seems like a pay method that is not linked to the market or to the actual workload. I have four kids and there is no way on God's green earth that they are 4X the work of a single kid. I would even say it's easier - they have playmates and basically do their own thing with each other. I do think bumping the pay up when an infant joins the family is reasonable but as the kids go off to school, then the nanny should expect for the salary to not grow as much. |
You are exactly correct, OP. |
You are paying someone for their time first, and the workload second. That's true in most jobs -- the base pay has to be enough to support them, and then the rest of the pay reflects duties, the job market, extra knowledge or skills, whatever.
|
You are wrong and you know it. |
Same thing happened to my mother... THREE full time people to replace her. |
She is absolutely correct....and she dang well knows it |
Agreed. I got $5/hr extra for the new baby. |