You do not have any idea "how it works" either because there is no such thing. The reassignment process would be different in every situation or setting.
And do you know what abject means? It describes a contemptible, miserable, worst, most extreme thing or state. You're calling this abject stupidity? That is A GRAVE DISSERVICE? PP did not say that in order to reassign an employee, the employer first dresses up like a giant chicken, then escorts the employee to the new office via mandatory cha-cha dance line before presenting a contract that guarantees the employee a salary of ten billion dollars only if she immediately spits in his boss' face and resigns before signing. I don't actually mind slightly-below-the-belt disagreement, but it is important to be thoughtful, specific, and right. Otherwise you are probably stepping over the line into tactless and mean. A useful litmus test moving forward might be, "Do I frequently hear 5 year olds using this insult?" You owe PP an apology. Yes, I said it. |
Oh, shut up. Her nanny is not to be loaned out to OP's frienfs lile a damn cup of flour! She is a FREE human being. OP, YOU ARE BENEATH CONTEMPYTand pond scum is repelled by you. |
I would be LIVID if my employers suggested I go work for one of their friend's in order to be paid for a week when they don't need me. I was hired to be a nanny for one family. You don't get to send me to another family because you don't want to pay me for a vacation. How insulting. I hope your nanny is looking for a new job. |
THANK U |