Concerning this and the PPs that touted only bathing 2-3 times a week, or a couple times a month?? Naaaasty Astonishing that people still believe this less-than-hygenic old wives tail in 2015. The biological processes that happens daily for all humans, calls for daily bathing. Babies get dirty every single day in that same way, in addition to feedings, pooping, playing, food in hair, etc. Barring living where water is a scarcity , give the child a daily bath. Remember, babies float in amniotic fluid for nine months. Do they come out looking dried out, or soft, silky skin. And our bodies have oil glands that remoisturize the skin.
Give you an example: In the 1600s, people only bathed once a year for the same false reason. Annual bath time was towards May's end. So those planning to marry around that time would plan a June wedding while they were still "relatively" fresh. And this is the where and why of the practice of being a "June bride" originated. Soooo people ran around smelling to high heaven, and diseases/deaths connected to uncleaness were rampant. |
Here's one more thought to share with MB.... Because people phone video, youtube upload and report things based on what they see, someone may report the child as being abused based on his unclean appearance. This could potentially become an unpleasant experience for MB/nanny if approached by CPS. Sometimes that service dysfunctions, and children get wrongfully removed from their loving homes the facts are misunderstood. Then see what your MB wants to do. The PP suggestion of asking her if you can start nighttime bath and she finished up sounds good. Both needs get met..MBs desire to mommy more & baby gets daily bath. Hopefully it can be worked out. |
| I meant to say, phrase and shape the "tone" to MB as a nanny's concern that some well-intentioned onlooker doesn't trigger such a situation. |
This is hilariously ill-informed. |
+1 The best way to be wrong is to be REALLY wrong and also REALLY condescending about it. Thanks for the laugh! |
If you think DCFS is going to intervene because a kid looks a little dirty you are living in a fantasy world. They are too busy taking care of children living with REAL problems like hunger and abuse, not greasy hair. Christ, the first world privilege here would be disgusting if it weren't so comical. |
+1, not to mention the fact that no matter how you phrase it, suggesting to a mother that the way she raises her child is likely to get CPS called in on her is a good way to get fired. |
|
Ooohhhh , you're right. Because you just never hear of this very thing happening. Guess you haven't heard, but they STILL open a case based on a report, call, and now there's video. Maybe you should sit in on some CPS / child advocate cases where parents loose their kids, who shouldn't. And parents who harmed their child, didn't. Fantasy? Comical? Not so much.
|
No condescension is intended, anymore than those who advocate lesser bathing. Which part is REALLY wrong? Which part is REALLY condescending? |
|
| You're overreacting. Babies don't need to be bathed that often. I doubt he's out there looking gross |