Did you forget the nanny's "at will" status? Nannies are usually let go whenever it's convenient for the parents, NOT according to the agreement. Nannies have every right (and ethical obligation) to consider their own financial situation, and proceed accordingly. |
It may take time to find a family to work for. She would be jeopardizing the her income. It is not a guarantee that she will be able to have a job lined up for the following week. This concept is one I am sure you can grasp, whether you agree or not. |
| I wouldn't have a retention bonus in a contract unless the job had a set end date going in. It doesn't make sense for an infant, but if you're not planning on employing a nanny once they start school or something, then it might make sense to offer one. |
| I think severance is a better way to protect a nanny's income than a retention bonus and can be written into a standard contract. |
+1. It needs a set end date. Retention bonuses are most common during a transition, such as when a company is acquired by another and wants to retain valuable employees to assure continuity, wrap up certain operations or to train their successors. My nannies have fortunately always left under happy circumstances (marriage, new career, birth of first child) and were able to give me ample notice. In turn, they all received generous parting gifts. When the relationship is great and mutually respectful, there is no need for severance or retention bonuses. |
Let me guess, "smart nannies" just hang out on the internet and fantasy land DCUM.. Love your incessant posting and time stamps. |