I thought I answered the questions decently, was told I "gave the run around" and was "too lectury" RSS feed

Anonymous
I apologize in advance for how long this is, but really want some honest feedback. I am interviewing for nanny positions, and recently had a prospective family email me a list of questions they wanted me to answer in writing.

The parents struck me as a bit high-maintenance, and their list of questions was VERY LONG, so I have included a few examples of the ones they had the most issue with. Their complaint is along the lines of the title of this thread, plus they said that reading my answers left them feeling "exhausted" rather than excited about me as a candidate, and that I was too general without being specific enough. I thought I was being thorough, but now I am thinking that I should have been more concise.

Question: If one of my children was being defiant and not listening, how would you make them listen?

[my] Answer: This is one of those “it depends” answers, and I think the best way for me to answer it is to pose some questions that I would have to mentally take into consideration before responding to the situation.

What is the child’s base temperament? Why is the child being defiant? What types of approaches is the child most receptive to? Is the child overly hungry, tired, or sick? Is this a new issue or one that is threatening to become a bad habit? Is the child simply testing me and seeking boundaries (which I will firmly provide when necessary), or does the defiance in fact have some legitimacy and perhaps I need to reconsider what is being asked of the child? Do the circumstances require immediate resolution on my part or do I have the luxury of time to really be creative?

I have no problem whatsoever being authoritative, but when it is reasonably possible to include the child in resolving the problem I think that is the best compromise.


Question: What do you think is important about meals, snacks, etc.?

[my] Answer: There is no one-size-fits all when it comes to children. Like adults, some are robust and enthusiastic eaters, while others tend to have naturally smaller appetites or narrower palates. Some are too busy to eat and it can be a challenge to get them to eat their three squares a day, while others prefer to eat smaller meals and have a snack in between meals.

As long as their approach to eating is not pathological, and results in overall good nutrition, I will be satisfied. One rule I strongly encourage is that a child try a new food at least the first three times it is introduced -- even if it is just one bite each time.

If a child simply cannot agree to eat the meal that has been prepared, the default option could be (for example) a peanut butter & jelly sandwich or a cheese sandwich, a choice of fruit or vegetable, and a choice of water or milk. This will allow me to accommodate the child within reason, without becoming a chronic short-order cook.

I refuse to turn mealtime into a battleground or a power of wills. Eating, like pottying and sleeping, is one of those domains where children naturally hold most of the power and I avoid power struggles where at all possible. All children will go through phases where they are more and less receptive to the eating options being offered, and one must learn to go with the flow while being creative. There are so many creative ways to camoflage good food that a child might be unwilling to eat in its natural state, there should be no reason for tears and angst.


And, one final example:

Question: Do you have any guidelines regarding what you consider a proper meal?

[my] Answer: I tend to view balanced nutrition over the course of several days, up to a week at a time. Meaning that while a variety of whole grains, lean proteins, fruits, vegetables, and the occasional fats and sugars are important in a child’s diet, trying to ensure that a child gets a perfect balance of these components each and every day is not my approach. Rather I will keep track of their eating and analyze it over the course of several days to make sure it stays balanced over the short term.

Drink -- mostly water, some 2% milk, maybe one small glass of juice per day if the child craves that little taste of sweet.

Limit or Avoid -- red meat (a little lean red meat once or twice a week is fine), processed meats, sodium, saturated fats (as in fatty meats or whole milks).

That having been said, if I had to design a “proper meal”, it would be something like:

- two whole grains
- one or two complete proteins (poultry, fish, cheese, milk, eggs, beans, the occasional lean red meat, etc.)
- one fruit
- one vegetable
Anonymous
Wayyyyy too long answers
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Wayyyyy too long answers


Agreed. I started zoning out during them. Plus they are SO generic. I feel like I could find those exact answers online. Your answers gave me no indication about the type of nanny you are.
Anonymous
I didn't read the answers once I saw you basically wrote 3 paragraph essay replies. Good that thy have you feedback though! You'll know for next time.
Anonymous
You should narrow them to about three sentences. They don't want to know every exception, they just want to know the rule. How do you make the kid listen *most* of the time. BTW red meat isn't that bad for you and saturated fats aren't the devil they were portrayed to be in the 80s. They're doing new research refuting that. You might want to keep up with current information. Red meat has the most nutritional bang for the buck.
Anonymous
Whenever I receive a questionnaire prior to meeting the family, I immediately pass them up. Unless they are paying way above average and with excellent benefits, I don't see the point in answering via email things like these. It's all situational and best answered during the interview.
Anonymous
OK, this has been useful feedback. If those questions had been asked in person, I would not have been as detailed as I did when responding in writing. However it's good to know that others feel the same way about my written responses so that I can respond differently if this is an issue in the future.
Anonymous
I agree with the parents. I think we all bend our styles around the children we're looking after, but for a family in an interview it's important for them to first get a sense of what that style is. In the first question, you gave no concrete examples of what you would actually DO. My advice would be that if you find a question has a lot of different answers depending on the specific scenario, then choose a scenario and response for yourself.

So my response to that first question would be something like: My technique may vary quite a bit based on the scenario, but if for example there was a safety concern (like holding hands while crossing the street) all other activity would stop until the child was listening. We would not begin to cross the street until the child had agreed to hold hands. If necessary we would go back in the car or find a safe space along the sidewalk to step back and give the child a chance to calm down and begin to listen.
Anonymous
For the first thing, YOU DID NOT ANSWER THE QUESTION.

They wanted concrete examples of how you would handle a kid saying no to leaving a store or something. You never directly answered the question.

Also, you come across as both too vague and too rigid (for me, as a MB).
Anonymous
These questions are awful you don't want to work for them.
Anonymous
I think your answers are great except for the last one. You allow juice but think whole milk is bad?!
Please do some more nutrition studying.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I think your answers are great except for the last one. You allow juice but think whole milk is bad?!
Please do some more nutrition studying.


This. You need to study up on what children actually need in their diets, not what you eat so you don't get fat. Children need healthy fats and dairy. In fact everyone does. All those grains you suggest are more worrisome than some whole milk.
Anonymous
Now a days most children don't drink juice. Only special occasions. And whole milk is what they drink. Just say milk in your answer. You fees them what they have on hand in the house anyway.
Anonymous
OP, why would you want to work for them?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Whenever I receive a questionnaire prior to meeting the family, I immediately pass them up. Unless they are paying way above average and with excellent benefits, I don't see the point in answering via email things like these. It's all situational and best answered during the interview.


Same.
post reply Forum Index » General Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: