16.35 here. You’re ridiculous. I’m a live-in nanny, and just like every live-in I know, I negotiate with salary, not by hourly rate. My contract reads that I am paid x salary per week for y hours on z schedule, and for the sake of legality, we break it down to hourly. I have zero interest in dropping my take-home pay by only being paid for worked hours. My employer travels, works 12+ hour days at least thrice per week, and generally needs 24/5 availability; if I wasn’t paid to be available for all those hours, I wouldn’t be available and my employer literally would not be able to do their job. I have a separate rate for extra hours that is more than double my “hourly” rate. My employer knows that I will make myself available in an emergency and that with at least a couple days of notice, I’ll be available when it’s not an emergency. Most nannies I know that work 24/4 or more do the same thing. We’re not paid OT for normal work, but we make it hand over fist when asked to work over our normal schedule. |
16.35 again. Since she’s European, I would advise that following the American federal holiday calendar makes no sense. Look at the holidays that mean something to you and her, and offer those off or at x1.5/2. Other than that, you’re golden. Because she’s not required to pay any taxes at all, has no housekeeping or driving, 2 weeks vacation, and has free insurance, it adds up to an amazing package. |
OP, you got sloppy up with your lies. Your kids are 2 & 4. |
13:49 she employs more than just a nanny and has likely done so since before her children were born. |
Have you considered that she may have grown children or teens in boarding school? Either way, her children at home could be 2/4, but she could easily have over 8 years as an employer. Additionally, she said live-in candidates. I’ve met several people hiring for (or who already had) a (live-in) housekeeper position that would become part-time nanny as back up for the primary (live-in) nanny in the future, once they started having kids. That housekeeper/future nanny is also more likely to negotiate salary than hourly rates, if the position is live-in. |
OP here - I do have an elder son at home who is a teenager and in no need of a nanny - why would I lie about my years as an employer? And that too on an anonymous thread where I am asking for advice.
I want to thank all the people who have posted really excellent advice, and been sincere in their explanations. I think I am happy with the replies and won’t be needing to comment going forward but I hope this information is helpful to another Mum who is in my unique situation! Cheers x |