Here is what employers of nanny's do not seem to understand... RSS feed

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don't get tired of the same book over again. I talk to my charges about different things in the pictures, change the voices and do other things to make each time different from the last couple times. Eventually, I repeat some things, probably verbatim after reading the book for the 200th time during a month. But my charges like knowing the stories while getting something different each time.

I have 8 different tunes for the alphabet song, and three different chants. I have an unlimited number of ways to incorporate letter sounds into our normal routine, and every time we look around, there's an opportunity to explore counting, letters, shapes, colors and patterns.

My charges may choose the same made-up game, but I always do something at least a little different from last time. We may go to the same park everyday, but we don't do the same things in the same order, and we don't talk to just the same 3 or 4 people.

I don't work with young infants because I find the exhausting. However, once they are trying to do things, I love it! My sweet spot is just darting to be verbal up to kindergarten, and no, it's not exhausting for me, at least not every day. If it was, I would do something else!


Off topic, but where does a family find a nanny like yourself?? You sound amazing!


It's not hard...

I got three new tunes from toddler songs on pandora in the last year. Others, I've made up or heard other places. Creativity doesn't have to be innate, I taught myself to look for opportunities to change the way I do things. All that's necessary is to have an interest.

As to where to find me, or someone like me, that would be the same place and way you would find any other nanny. Agencies, word of mouth, kids' classes parks, dcum ads, neighborhood listservs, etc.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes, being a great nanny is exhausting. Too bad some parents think of it as an easy job that is worth less than slinging fast food.


How much do you think fast food workers are getting paid? Most nanny's make well over minimum wage.


That would be the point. Many parents feel minimum wage or slightly more is great pay for a nanny. They find no true value in childcare.


That’s not true. I think what parents offer is usually related to their budget. We’d all love to pay you $50/hr, but at that point it would make no sense for me to work at all.


The concept many nanny employers fail to grasp is that the nanny they hire MUST make enough money to pay her bills. If you (the parent) could not survive on what you pay your nanny, neither can she. This is caused in most cases by affluency envy amongst families making daycare level wages and expectating to get nanny care.

Do a little research on how much apartments and basic cars cost in your area. Think about utilities, cell phones, insuranc costs, and the cost of food and gas. Take this numbers, look at what you can afford to pay great e childcare, and then be honest about whether you can actually afford the most expensive form of childcare.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes, being a great nanny is exhausting. Too bad some parents think of it as an easy job that is worth less than slinging fast food.


How much do you think fast food workers are getting paid? Most nanny's make well over minimum wage.


That would be the point. Many parents feel minimum wage or slightly more is great pay for a nanny. They find no true value in childcare.


That’s not true. I think what parents offer is usually related to their budget. We’d all love to pay you $50/hr, but at that point it would make no sense for me to work at all.


The concept many nanny employers fail to grasp is that the nanny they hire MUST make enough money to pay her bills. If you (the parent) could not survive on what you pay your nanny, neither can she. This is caused in most cases by affluency envy amongst families making daycare level wages and expectating to get nanny care.

Do a little research on how much apartments and basic cars cost in your area. Think about utilities, cell phones, insuranc costs, and the cost of food and gas. Take this numbers, look at what you can afford to pay great e childcare, and then be honest about whether you can actually afford the most expensive form of childcare.



A nanny costs about the same as daycare, and is usually less if you have multiple children. Having a nanny is no longer an "elite" form of childcare, at least in the DC area.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes, being a great nanny is exhausting. Too bad some parents think of it as an easy job that is worth less than slinging fast food.


How much do you think fast food workers are getting paid? Most nanny's make well over minimum wage.


That would be the point. Many parents feel minimum wage or slightly more is great pay for a nanny. They find no true value in childcare.


That’s not true. I think what parents offer is usually related to their budget. We’d all love to pay you $50/hr, but at that point it would make no sense for me to work at all.


The concept many nanny employers fail to grasp is that the nanny they hire MUST make enough money to pay her bills. If you (the parent) could not survive on what you pay your nanny, neither can she. This is caused in most cases by affluency envy amongst families making daycare level wages and expectating to get nanny care.

Do a little research on how much apartments and basic cars cost in your area. Think about utilities, cell phones, insuranc costs, and the cost of food and gas. Take this numbers, look at what you can afford to pay great e childcare, and then be honest about whether you can actually afford the most expensive form of childcare.



The concept nannies fail to grasp is that there is someone else out there willing to do the job for less. It’s basic supply and demand. If all nannies jacked up their rates above $20, most would be out of a job. And McDonalds and whatever other jobs you can get without an education do not pay any better.
Anonymous
Why do so many “nanny’s” not understand that the plural of nanny is NANNIES? “Nanny’s” would refer to the possession of ONE nanny, not pluralize nanny. Again, NANNIES. I wouldn’t want anyone to watch my children that didn’t know that distinction. It’s atrocious and even the average 9 year old should know the difference between pluralization and possession...
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Why do so many “nanny’s” not understand that the plural of nanny is NANNIES? “Nanny’s” would refer to the possession of ONE nanny, not pluralize nanny. Again, NANNIES. I wouldn’t want anyone to watch my children that didn’t know that distinction. It’s atrocious and even the average 9 year old should know the difference between pluralization and possession...


Phones do weird automatic corrections, PP. You need to calm down and concern yourself with things in the world that are truly "atrocious".
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why do so many “nanny’s” not understand that the plural of nanny is NANNIES? “Nanny’s” would refer to the possession of ONE nanny, not pluralize nanny. Again, NANNIES. I wouldn’t want anyone to watch my children that didn’t know that distinction. It’s atrocious and even the average 9 year old should know the difference between pluralization and possession...


Phones do weird automatic corrections, PP. You need to calm down and concern yourself with things in the world that are truly "atrocious".


+ 1. People who comment on autocorrect mistakes have empty lives.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why do so many “nanny’s” not understand that the plural of nanny is NANNIES? “Nanny’s” would refer to the possession of ONE nanny, not pluralize nanny. Again, NANNIES. I wouldn’t want anyone to watch my children that didn’t know that distinction. It’s atrocious and even the average 9 year old should know the difference between pluralization and possession...


Phones do weird automatic corrections, PP. You need to calm down and concern yourself with things in the world that are truly "atrocious".


+ 1. People who comment on autocorrect mistakes have empty lives.


Sure, blame autocorrect. Of course, it’s just so hard to correct it if that happens and take 5 seconds to proofread, so as not to look like an idiot. People who have horrid grammar, in addition to being lazy, shouldn’t be teaching children.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why do so many “nanny’s” not understand that the plural of nanny is NANNIES? “Nanny’s” would refer to the possession of ONE nanny, not pluralize nanny. Again, NANNIES. I wouldn’t want anyone to watch my children that didn’t know that distinction. It’s atrocious and even the average 9 year old should know the difference between pluralization and possession...


Phones do weird automatic corrections, PP. You need to calm down and concern yourself with things in the world that are truly "atrocious".


+ 1. People who comment on autocorrect mistakes have empty lives.


Sure, blame autocorrect. Of course, it’s just so hard to correct it if that happens and take 5 seconds to proofread, so as not to look like an idiot. People who have horrid grammar, in addition to being lazy, shouldn’t be teaching children.


Most educated women do not want to be a nanny. It's that simple.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why do so many “nanny’s” not understand that the plural of nanny is NANNIES? “Nanny’s” would refer to the possession of ONE nanny, not pluralize nanny. Again, NANNIES. I wouldn’t want anyone to watch my children that didn’t know that distinction. It’s atrocious and even the average 9 year old should know the difference between pluralization and possession...


Phones do weird automatic corrections, PP. You need to calm down and concern yourself with things in the world that are truly "atrocious".


+ 1. People who comment on autocorrect mistakes have empty lives.


Sure, blame autocorrect. Of course, it’s just so hard to correct it if that happens and take 5 seconds to proofread, so as not to look like an idiot. People who have horrid grammar, in addition to being lazy, shouldn’t be teaching children.


Most educated women do not want to be a nanny. It's that simple.

Most educated women do not want to be professors, either.
What's your point?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why do so many “nanny’s” not understand that the plural of nanny is NANNIES? “Nanny’s” would refer to the possession of ONE nanny, not pluralize nanny. Again, NANNIES. I wouldn’t want anyone to watch my children that didn’t know that distinction. It’s atrocious and even the average 9 year old should know the difference between pluralization and possession...


Phones do weird automatic corrections, PP. You need to calm down and concern yourself with things in the world that are truly "atrocious".


+ 1. People who comment on autocorrect mistakes have empty lives.


Sure, blame autocorrect. Of course, it’s just so hard to correct it if that happens and take 5 seconds to proofread, so as not to look like an idiot. People who have horrid grammar, in addition to being lazy, shouldn’t be teaching children.


Most educated women do not want to be a nanny. It's that simple.

Most educated women do not want to be professors, either.
What's your point?


Source?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Most educated women do not want to be a nanny. It's that simple.


I think you'd be surprised how many degree holding nannies there actually are. It's a lot more than you might think. You'd better pray that all these educated women don't leave the industry; otherwise MBs are going to have to stay home with their own kids. I think its splendid that feminism's solution to female parent's entering the workforce and have more help at home was to hire another woman to do it for them.
Anonymous
No, MBs understand this. We are the parents and watch them the other 15 hours of the day and weekends when you are not there.

I think that you did not understand this when you decided on this profession. Perhaps you should pick a different one.

It's more difficult for me to watch kids than do housework too. But it's not the case for everyone. Some people like it. Some people think the pros weigh the cons.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Maybe find a different profession. Parents seem to be able to clean and care for kids just fine.


Really? Because my employers talk about how exhausted they are on Sunday evenings and it's just 2 days in a row with 2 parents either together or taking shifts with the child. I do it 5 days in a row alone. When one parent travels, I always end up helping out for half of a day on the weekend which makes it a 6 day work week for me, and I still survive doing 50+ hrs each week.

I love my employers, but the toddler won't sit in her high chair and wear a bib while eating dinner with them, meanwhile she doesn't fuss any of the 20+ times I have her seated for me each week. They also can't get her to lay down for a diaper change, get her to not climb on top of the table, and it took a month longer for them to get her to drink milk in a cup for them after she had been doing it for me just fine. My employer also cannot wipe down the high chair after use if it were to save her life, while I rarely have to because the toddler doesn't make a huge mess for me.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes, being a great nanny is exhausting. Too bad some parents think of it as an easy job that is worth less than slinging fast food.


How much do you think fast food workers are getting paid? Most nanny's make well over minimum wage.


That would be the point. Many parents feel minimum wage or slightly more is great pay for a nanny. They find no true value in childcare.


That’s not true. I think what parents offer is usually related to their budget. We’d all love to pay you $50/hr, but at that point it would make no sense for me to work at all.


The concept many nanny employers fail to grasp is that the nanny they hire MUST make enough money to pay her bills. If you (the parent) could not survive on what you pay your nanny, neither can she. This is caused in most cases by affluency envy amongst families making daycare level wages and expectating to get nanny care.

Do a little research on how much apartments and basic cars cost in your area. Think about utilities, cell phones, insuranc costs, and the cost of food and gas. Take this numbers, look at what you can afford to pay great e childcare, and then be honest about whether you can actually afford the most expensive form of childcare.



A nanny costs about the same as daycare, and is usually less if you have multiple children. Having a nanny is no longer an "elite" form of childcare, at least in the DC area.

Maybe your sitter costs than same as daycare, but certainly not a nanny. Perhaps you thought they were the same. It's alright, hon, we're here to help you. There's a very good discussion explaining the difference.

"Sitter vs Nanny"
post reply Forum Index » General Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: