|
OP here. The nanny's child is in 8th grade and moving into our guest house puts the daughter in a fantastic school district which is what the nanny wants. Of course I will pay her for any time she spends with me and the baby after hours. I will cover utilities if you guys think it is a big deal.
Thanks for the input! |
| Ok so the nanny wants to live-in and it's a mutual benefit. I would just do live out rate and nanny pays a discounted monthly rent, utilities included. Main issue in this situation is if the nanny does not work out for some reason, they cannot just move anytime so have a separate lease agreement to keep things clear. |
Only a fool would agree to these conditions. |
Nanny is getting a market rate. She pays utilities. |
|
OP, you need to get something out of this arrangement, too, or it would make more sense to rent the apartment for market rate and hire the nanny separately.
What you are describing seems eminently fair to me: the nanny gets a market-rate pay rate, and you get someone who agrees to be on call when needed. |
Nanny is getting a much reduced rate and OP is covering utilities. |
On call 24/5 - and then only in am emergency. OP made that clear. I think it sounds like a great arrangement for everyone! |
|
We live in Bethesda. We paid $18 for live out (both kids in school 3-6 hours a day), and then $11 for live-in. we essentially subtracted the $1000 in-law suit from her monthly salary. 40 hours a week, 12 noon to 6pm. This is higher pay than for an au pair program.
implicit in this arrangement is that nanny pays zero for water, electricity, heating, cooling, parking; she does not pay taxes on her income that goes to implied rent (i.e. to pay $1000 comparable rent, one must earn $1200 gross at least) and she has zero commute. |
|
OP, my advice will be probably at odds at what others have told you.
You're being had. First, it is very rarely the case that a live-in nanny gets to bring her relatives to live with her. You occasionally find live-in accommodations for a married couple but it is out of the ordinary. Most of the time live-in nannies have a bedroom/bathroom or a basement apartment where they live by themselves. How will the nanny take care of her elementary school child? Who will handle aftercare? Are you completely sure the nanny wouldn't want to look after her child AND yours, while drawing a top-dollar rate for a substandard product? Have you thought about this? Is it in your contract that she must not provide care to her own child while she's on the clock? Secondly, for $25-30/hr you can have the world's most amazing nannies lining up at your doorstep yelling "pick me!". For $20/hr you can have your choice of highly qualified, live-out nannies without the hassle of living with them and dealing with tenancy issues in case something goes wrong. I get that you are a FTM so you think having a newborn is an insurmountable challenge. It really isn't. Unless you want to be extremely hands-off, you don't need a 24/7 nanny for 5 days a week assuming your child is healthy. You really don't. So far, all I see in your arrangement is a bonanza for the nanny. An excellent school district, free family accommodations, and a top rate (even for a live-out). What do YOU get? |
The nanny's kid is in 8th grade - that makes her about 13. Nanny doesn't have to "watch" her. And I live-out and my rate is $25 to $30 (masters in Early Childhood Development, years of preschool teaching and infant care as a nanny). It all depends on what OP wants in a nanny and how much she is willing to pay for what she wants. My current job started two years ago at $27 an hour with one newborn and is now $28 plus covering my healthcare insurance now that the child is 2. |
OP gets a great and expensive nanny at a greatly reduced rate and the comfort of having an experienced child care giver four steps from her back door. |
I agree this makes sense - but the value of the unit in her eyes is likely what she would pay for housing plus a bonus for good school district, which may not be the same as the specific unit's value. |
But it's not like the nanny can pretend her child doesn't exist, right? You must agree that live-in accommodation for nannies with families are quite uncommon, usually it's just the nanny. What you offer can be had for less than $25. This is not a dis against you, just market reality. There are more nannies like you than $30/hr jobs. |
We don't know that the rate is "greatly reduced", and we don't know that the nanny is great, just that she's expensive. |
If that caregiver is working set hours, it doesn't really matter where they live. She is either available around the clock or she isn't, and her living there doesn't make her automatically available unless the contract specifies this. |