So true. There is no need for the NF to pay anything as it is not their responsibility. I'd be cautious of PP's suggestions to pay half out of some good will because doing that just encourages the nanny's immature and unrealistic expectations of what the NF owes her. |
sounds fishy. not even the side view mirror hit, just the window...?... |
| Here's the thing - half is a nice gesture yes, but it also sets a very bad precedent - next its a flat tire, a broken mirror, and cracked iphone screen etc - I might instead tell her you'll provide a one time bonus of XX amount that she can choose to do whatever with - and I'd make it clear you aren't covering this again and she needs better insurance. |
| No, you are not supposed to pay for her broken glass. Legally, morally, you are not obligated. However, if she did ask, you can pay for half as a good gesture if you want to keep working with her. I would think twice about hiring someone who asks employer to be responsible for random accidents, however. |
| Found your babysitter! http://isawyournanny.blogspot.com/2015/05/broken-mirror-while-babysitting.html?m=1 |
| If I'm required to have my car there to transport your children, it will be in the contract that any damage within working hours that is *not* my fault is paid by the employer. I don't need a car for myself, so if I have to purchase one to use for a position? There's no way I would be paying for that glass, that or I would pay for it to be fixed, sell it, and the family can provide a work vehicle. |
Wow good find ! Op don't pay her anything |
Agree. If OP goes along the route of control buying something, she should call around a few places for quotes in replacing windows and offer half of what it actually costs. It is NOT $1k. |
Except that's a driver side rear-view mirror, not a window. |
| Ah, babysitter, not nanny, date night, now I see the distinction. Nanny's vehicle and required for work would definitely be NF rasponsibility. |
I wrote the quote above. I thought she did not need her car while on the job. If they require her to have a car on the job for driving the child(ren), then that's a different story. |
Good luck with that. I'd never allow that language in the contract. It's ridiculous to think an employer should pay if your car happens to be broken into while parked at the library. The IRS rate is sufficient to cover gas, wear and tear and insurance for using your car on the job. It's your responsibility, as an adult, to sufficiently insure your vehicle. If you don't like it, don't take a job that requires you to have a vehicle. |
That's why I don't take a job that requires driving too many drama . |
| No, the IRS rate was NOT tailored for damage by untamed children. |
Or take a job where the family provides one, yep, done. |