It's beyond her intellectual abilities |
| Is a $15/Hr considered "cheap"?? |
| $15/hour is NOT cheap. I would love to make $15/hour. If I want to roll in the dough I would become a highly trained doctor or lawyer but as a nanny, $15 sounds great!! |
Seriously? Are you a nanny? I have a BA in Early Childhood Education from a good university and graduated top of my class. I've been a teacher in a preschool for seven years before accepting a position as a nanny. I also speak fluent french and play the piano. I'm currently earning $21.50 for just one child an hour and am in my second year with the family (started at $20). No, you will never become wealthy working as a nanny or a preschool teacher - but if you have a passion to work with preschool age children these are your only two options. Do we not deserve a living wage? |
Not everyone in this line of work has your skill set and credentials. So "we" in this case includes a very wide variety of skills and backgrounds. Those with high school education are less likely to have your level of compensation. And they may be a majority of nanny job seekers. |
| 12:42, $15/hr is well above minimum wage and is absolutely a "living wage". It may not afford you some luxuries you feel entitled to, but it a living wage commensurate with the requirements of the job. |
It is a living wage for a young, single person. It is not a living wage for a single mother. |
We're back to square 1 of wage discussions. Should living wage standards depend on whether a job candidate is single or married and on how many children she has? What if she is single when hired but then becomes a mother to twins? Should her salary automatically triple? What if she supports an elderly parent? quadruple? What if it's not a parent but a distant relative? Etc. etc. All these people should have different salaries for the same job? |