Minimum wage rising and nannies wages

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one said the only benefit of a share was cost, although it is certainly A benefit.

Also, there is no such thing as the dreaded singleton experience. That's just your weird issue.

You may search the parents' forum if you'd like a dose of reality.

Go ahead and do that search. You'll find lots of "singleton by choice" threads. Don't pretend they aren't there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one said the only benefit of a share was cost, although it is certainly A benefit.

Also, there is no such thing as the dreaded singleton experience. That's just your weird issue.

You may search the parents' forum if you'd like a dose of reality.

Go ahead and do that search. You'll find lots of "singleton by choice" threads. Don't pretend they aren't there.

You'll find both ends of the spectrum. No one cares how many children you have.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one said the only benefit of a share was cost, although it is certainly A benefit.

Also, there is no such thing as the dreaded singleton experience. That's just your weird issue.

You may search the parents' forum if you'd like a dose of reality.

Go ahead and do that search. You'll find lots of "singleton by choice" threads. Don't pretend they aren't there.

You'll find both ends of the spectrum. No one cares how many children you have.

Except the person who keeps harping about a "dreaded singleton."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one said the only benefit of a share was cost, although it is certainly A benefit.

Also, there is no such thing as the dreaded singleton experience. That's just your weird issue.

You may search the parents' forum if you'd like a dose of reality.

Go ahead and do that search. You'll find lots of "singleton by choice" threads. Don't pretend they aren't there.

You'll find both ends of the spectrum. No one cares how many children you have.

Except the person who keeps harping about a "dreaded singleton."

You.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one said the only benefit of a share was cost, although it is certainly A benefit.

Also, there is no such thing as the dreaded singleton experience. That's just your weird issue.

You may search the parents' forum if you'd like a dose of reality.

Go ahead and do that search. You'll find lots of "singleton by choice" threads. Don't pretend they aren't there.

You'll find both ends of the spectrum. No one cares how many children you have.

Except the person who keeps harping about a "dreaded singleton."

You.

Huh? The only person who uses this language is a nanny who keeps arguing that nanny shares with the nanny's child are a salvation for the poor only child. I have one and I am very happy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one said the only benefit of a share was cost, although it is certainly A benefit.

Also, there is no such thing as the dreaded singleton experience. That's just your weird issue.

You may search the parents' forum if you'd like a dose of reality.

Go ahead and do that search. You'll find lots of "singleton by choice" threads. Don't pretend they aren't there.

You'll find both ends of the spectrum. No one cares how many children you have.

Except the person who keeps harping about a "dreaded singleton."

You.

Huh? The only person who uses this language is a nanny who keeps arguing that nanny shares with the nanny's child are a salvation for the poor only child. I have one and I am very happy.

You can stop feeling sorry for yourself and move on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one said the only benefit of a share was cost, although it is certainly A benefit.

Also, there is no such thing as the dreaded singleton experience. That's just your weird issue.

You may search the parents' forum if you'd like a dose of reality.

Go ahead and do that search. You'll find lots of "singleton by choice" threads. Don't pretend they aren't there.

You'll find both ends of the spectrum. No one cares how many children you have.

Except the person who keeps harping about a "dreaded singleton."

You.

Huh? The only person who uses this language is a nanny who keeps arguing that nanny shares with the nanny's child are a salvation for the poor only child. I have one and I am very happy.

You can stop feeling sorry for yourself and move on.

What makes you think I feel sorry for myself?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Because nannies, atleast most, go into the nanny profession because it's easy and doesn't require an education so that's why they will stay in the profession regardless cause where else will they go? RETAILLL!

How’s nannying easy according to you? And what makes you think that nannies don’t have education or employers don’t require their nannies to have at least AA? Just to share and/or educate folks like you, a lot of nannies in the Bethesda, DC are college educated and some are former teachers with Master Degrees. Also, they’re getting top pay as recruiters/ agencies get clients that actually afford to pay very decently(not your typical dcum salary, fyi)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just read an article that minimum wage is going up in the district and Montgomery county where it is to reach $12.50. When the minimum wage was $7.25 and an average nanny makes $15 that would mean nannies make about twice the minimum. With this recent increase it looks that nannies will be almost at the minimum. Do you all think this means nannies wages will/should increase? I know wages depend on the supply side and families' ability to pay. But, if all of a sudden all a nanny is making is a minimum why stay in this profession?

I doubt there are many bs nannies making less than $20/hr.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Because nannies, atleast most, go into the nanny profession because it's easy and doesn't require an education so that's why they will stay in the profession regardless cause where else will they go? RETAILLL!

How’s nannying easy according to you? And what makes you believe that nannies don’t have education or the profession doesn’t required any diploma? A lot of CAREER nannies were former teachers and make way more than teachers in today’s time. Y’all need to do a lot of research before commenting on this plataform.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I doubt it. Nannies don't work for companies where laws are enforced. An individual can pay whatever they want

Try it and see what happens.

[Anonymous]

What will happen, PP?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because nannies, atleast most, go into the nanny profession because it's easy and doesn't require an education so that's why they will stay in the profession regardless cause where else will they go? RETAILLL!

How’s nannying easy according to you? And what makes you believe that nannies don’t have education or the profession doesn’t required any diploma? A lot of CAREER nannies were former teachers and make way more than teachers in today’s time. Y’all need to do a lot of research before commenting on this plataform.

DP. This is very misleading. Our former nanny was a former teacher and was never able to find any other nanny friends that had the same background. A lot of people who leave teaching do so because they want to work with adults. And while the pay may be better as a nanny an employer simply cannot recreate the benefits most public school teachers have (pension, a union, the same type of health insurance, etc).