Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hey, OP, can you take your smug attitude elsewhere? Thanks!
OP here. And no, I won't. Because I hope that this conversation will make the 40-year-olds out there step up, realize they can get pregnant, and use birth control if they don't want to be pregnant. That will spare them either the abortion the don't want to have or the child they don't want.
The multitude of threads on this board alone shows is a big problem that women aren't handling.
Sorry, OP, I think they were responding to my post ("Another one") and you got caught in the cross-fire. I'm the poster that originally commented on how many threads of 40+ might be/don't want to be pregnant women there have been lately. I completely agree with everything you wrote, especially the last sentence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hey, OP, can you take your smug attitude elsewhere? Thanks!
OP here. And no, I won't. Because I hope that this conversation will make the 40-year-olds out there step up, realize they can get pregnant, and use birth control if they don't want to be pregnant. That will spare them either the abortion the don't want to have or the child they don't want.
The multitude of threads on this board alone shows is a big problem that women aren't handling.
Anonymous wrote:Hey, OP, can you take your smug attitude elsewhere? Thanks!
Anonymous wrote:I don't get why you care so much? I'm one of the pp's who struggled to get pg for years and now have 2 kids in my 40's. We're married, educated, employed with a family. If by some miracle we had a third child, we'd handle it. We're not looking for another, I'm pretty tired now and I'd be really tired if I had another baby, but it wouldn't be a giant life-altering crisis.
It is different than not using birth control as a teenager. First of all, we're waaaaay less fertile than teenagers, secondly we're waaaaaay less sexually active than teenagers, and thirdly we're waaaay more prepared for a child than a teenager would be. Deal with your own sex life, stop judging mine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Because birth control is unpleasant and I'd rather take my extremely low chances of having another kid versus any kind of contraceptive.
Why aren't you smart enough to understand that we all have our reasons, OP?
Sillybilly.
Not to mention that sex is waaaaay better without birth control pills or condoms. Everything works the way nature intended.
Maybe for you. Birth control pills and the IUD were zero problems for me, and I noticed no difference between that sex and totally birth control-free sex when we were trying to conceive.
It's probably all in your head.
All in your Head!? Are you kidding me? One the most COMMON side effects of bc is low libido.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Because birth control is unpleasant and I'd rather take my extremely low chances of having another kid versus any kind of contraceptive.
Why aren't you smart enough to understand that we all have our reasons, OP?
Sillybilly.
Not to mention that sex is waaaaay better without birth control pills or condoms. Everything works the way nature intended.
Maybe for you. Birth control pills and the IUD were zero problems for me, and I noticed no difference between that sex and totally birth control-free sex when we were trying to conceive.
It's probably all in your head.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't get why you care so much? I'm one of the pp's who struggled to get pg for years and now have 2 kids in my 40's. We're married, educated, employed with a family. If by some miracle we had a third child, we'd handle it. We're not looking for another, I'm pretty tired now and I'd be really tired if I had another baby, but it wouldn't be a giant life-altering crisis.
It is different than not using birth control as a teenager. First of all, we're waaaaay less fertile than teenagers, secondly we're waaaaaay less sexually active than teenagers, and thirdly we're waaaay more prepared for a child than a teenager would be. Deal with your own sex life, stop judging mine.
I care so much because of all the threads from 40-something women who are shocked -- shocked! -- that they might be pregnant, despite not using birth control.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Because birth control is unpleasant and I'd rather take my extremely low chances of having another kid versus any kind of contraceptive.
Why aren't you smart enough to understand that we all have our reasons, OP?
Sillybilly.
It's not that OP isn't smart enough to understand the reasons, it's that there has been thread after thread these past few months of women in their 40s posting that they weren't using birth control and might be pregnant, don't want to be pregnant, aren't sure if they want to be pregnant, don't know what to do. Reading about women in their 40s who just neglected to use birth control and are now terminating a pregnancy because they didn't think they could get pregnant at 41 (42, 43, etc.) and already have enough kids is mind-boggling and irritating. I guess I expect better of women in this area.
To the PP who said it couldn't happen to her at 48 . . . yes, the chances are very slim but there was a long thread on pregnancies in the late 40s not that long ago. My own grandmother got pregnant naturally at 47 in what had to have been a one-shot deal.
Anonymous wrote:We use natural family planning, so no need for artificial birth control.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tubal ligation at 42 pregnant at 48.
Wow!
Anonymous wrote:I am a lesbian. No need.