Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AP there Since about Sept/Oct of 2021.
No, their previous AP was there then.
November 2021, AP tagged and mentioned: https://www.instagram.com/p/CW5yWhDrffP/
Previous AP got married that fall and moved.
If Nov 21 is true, then her 2 years are up in a few weeks and she has to go home. Maybe this is why the police moved on it.
Where the hell is the AP agency in all this and why did they let her stay in that house.
Why would the dad lie to protect the AP.
She had pictures of the 2 of them on her socials. One is posted in this thread. Draw your own conclusions.
“There was no forced entry whatsoever. This was not a home invasion,” Davis said. “Here’s what I can say right now with certainty: He did not force entry into the home. I do not know exactly what the nature of his presence in the home is all about just yet, but we’re working hard to determine that.”
“We don’t think he is necessarily a stranger,” Davis added of Ryan, before describing Christine Banfield’s hhusband, a 38-year-old man, and the au pair, then 22, as “present and involved.”
While the husband declined to speak with Fairfax County detectives, the au pair did the opposite, Davis said.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AP there Since about Sept/Oct of 2021.
No, their previous AP was there then.
November 2021, AP tagged and mentioned: https://www.instagram.com/p/CW5yWhDrffP/
Previous AP got married that fall and moved.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AP there Since about Sept/Oct of 2021.
No, their previous AP was there then.
November 2021, AP tagged and mentioned: https://www.instagram.com/p/CW5yWhDrffP/
Previous AP got married that fall and moved.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AP there Since about Sept/Oct of 2021.
No, their previous AP was there then.
Anonymous wrote:AP there Since about Sept/Oct of 2021.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Totally bonkers.
I don’t entirely know what to think except I think the husband refused to talk to the police for a very good reason.
The only scenario I can think of with all four of them in the home is a murder for hire with the ultimate plan being to for the nanny to kill Ryan while he was in the act and thus no witnesses except the husband and Au pair who were hatched the plan. That’s really worded though, I admit.
It was alleged that Ryan was swinging with the couple and that he had been there before.
It's been alleged by exactly one obsessed wackjob on this forum. Can we please not do that again?
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/780/1115264.page
Original blog for context SO MUCH HAS BEEN REMOVED
Actually there were multiple posts on multiple sites by friends of Joe that he was into swinging with couples. If a VA political candidate can swing, certainly possible.
There were posts about Brendan Banfield that were removed almost in real time.
A lot of attempts to shape the narrative on here. A lot will surely come out.
Astonishing that the au pair has been there playing happy families this whole time and that Brendan Banfield still has not spoken to LE.
Christine, Joe and certainly the child, all deserved better.
People can always walk away from marriages.
None of which were ever linked here. You are clearly the person obsessed with this. It's really creepy. Again I am asking you to stop.
It's all going to come out, the cops have the electronic messages.
I did not know JR but there were posts here and elsewhere from those who did, who shared socials with him, etc. Stop trying to control everyone, it's not going to work. Maybe the joke that you are Brendan's mom posting in an overwrought repetitive way were true? Stranger things I suppose.
LE says the investigation is ongoing into the stabbing and they are looking at electronic communications. More will come out. That Brendan has never spoken with LE is far more telling than the sex life of Joe.
THIS!
You people are nuts.
It's not common for the husband of a murdered woman to refuse to speak with LE, esp when he is quasi-LE himself. And to claim to have shot someone when forensic suggested that was a lie and the au pair has been charged is bizarre.
Probably best for the Banfield family to stay off social media at this time. Focus on the well being of the young child.
LE is not backing off this and the facts will be what they are. It's very likely that more charges will be forthcoming, LE clearly stated the investigation is ongoing and they are examining electronic records.
What are you responding to? Do you really think Brendan Banfield's MOM is on DCUM posting about her daughter in law's murder? Get a grip.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:pictures are circulating of the Au Pair with the Husband, she never posted for the public, but did post for some close friends. They were indeed together, but her being charged with 2nd degree is to strange. Waiting if any charges are being brought against the husband as well.
Where did you hear that?
They seem to be trying to get her to flip on Brendan Banfield to strengthen their case. Then they will offer her a plea.
i know someone that knew Juliana, she was telling people how great her bf was (brendan), and i did saw the picture juliana posted to her close friends with him.
So the wife knew about the relationship with the au pair and then the au pair suddenly went crazy and killed both? or was she in a relationship with both the husband and wife?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Could it be a sister?
It’s his mother. She posts about her grandchild.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Totally bonkers.
I don’t entirely know what to think except I think the husband refused to talk to the police for a very good reason.
The only scenario I can think of with all four of them in the home is a murder for hire with the ultimate plan being to for the nanny to kill Ryan while he was in the act and thus no witnesses except the husband and Au pair who were hatched the plan. That’s really worded though, I admit.
It was alleged that Ryan was swinging with the couple and that he had been there before.
It's been alleged by exactly one obsessed wackjob on this forum. Can we please not do that again?
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/780/1115264.page
Original blog for context SO MUCH HAS BEEN REMOVED
Actually there were multiple posts on multiple sites by friends of Joe that he was into swinging with couples. If a VA political candidate can swing, certainly possible.
There were posts about Brendan Banfield that were removed almost in real time.
A lot of attempts to shape the narrative on here. A lot will surely come out.
Astonishing that the au pair has been there playing happy families this whole time and that Brendan Banfield still has not spoken to LE.
Christine, Joe and certainly the child, all deserved better.
People can always walk away from marriages.
None of which were ever linked here. You are clearly the person obsessed with this. It's really creepy. Again I am asking you to stop.
It's all going to come out, the cops have the electronic messages.
I did not know JR but there were posts here and elsewhere from those who did, who shared socials with him, etc. Stop trying to control everyone, it's not going to work. Maybe the joke that you are Brendan's mom posting in an overwrought repetitive way were true? Stranger things I suppose.
LE says the investigation is ongoing into the stabbing and they are looking at electronic communications. More will come out. That Brendan has never spoken with LE is far more telling than the sex life of Joe.
THIS!
You people are nuts.