Anonymous wrote:Claiming the Homestead Deduction in MD is genuinely tax fraud if he's not living there, but that could have been done automatically at the time of purchase by mistake because he didn't own another home *in MD.* If he contacts them and pays the arrears, it's not that big a deal. Remember that to be criminal, tax fraud has to be intended.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP here. I get that there can be problems with taxes. I bought an investment property in DC, realized a couple months in that it was listed with homestead deduction (the prior owners did live in it), and contacted OTR. It took them several months to fix it. If I ran for office it might look like I claimed homestead deductions on two different DC properties for a while.
But I'd be able to show that I fixed it before a tax bill ever came. I want my elected officials to be *more* detail-oriented than I am, not less.
The narrative that is being presented is that he has not claimed the homestead deduction on his DC property from the time he purchased his property in MD.
So he had many years of claiming it - than filed to change it with DC by accident?
I don't get how you accidently file that that form.
Or not realize for many years that you are getting a deduction you shouldn't be...and not getting the deduction you want. Unless you want the deduction on the higher taxed property....which seems like is...tax fraud?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP here. I get that there can be problems with taxes. I bought an investment property in DC, realized a couple months in that it was listed with homestead deduction (the prior owners did live in it), and contacted OTR. It took them several months to fix it. If I ran for office it might look like I claimed homestead deductions on two different DC properties for a while.
But I'd be able to show that I fixed it before a tax bill ever came. I want my elected officials to be *more* detail-oriented than I am, not less.
The narrative that is being presented is that he has not claimed the homestead deduction on his DC property from the time he purchased his property in MD.
So he had many years of claiming it - than filed to change it with DC by accident?
I don't get how you accidently file that that form.
Anonymous wrote:NP here. I get that there can be problems with taxes. I bought an investment property in DC, realized a couple months in that it was listed with homestead deduction (the prior owners did live in it), and contacted OTR. It took them several months to fix it. If I ran for office it might look like I claimed homestead deductions on two different DC properties for a while.
But I'd be able to show that I fixed it before a tax bill ever came. I want my elected officials to be *more* detail-oriented than I am, not less.
Anonymous wrote:Patterson defenders are either choosing to just be obtuse or really have drunk the punch. A person buys an over half million dollar house, fails to pay their HOA fees, and y’all are like yup nothings happening. This thread hasn’t even really even got to the worst of what’s been reported – as an ANC wrote bad checks and failed to hold a meeting as chair for 6 months!
Anonymous wrote:To me, I understand people's living situations are complicated, but the most damning information was posted in the other thread. The last time Patterson held office he lost more than $30k meant to go to his communities, didn't follow the law on spending money and deliberately bounced checks intended for the Boys & Girls club. He also evidently didn't bother to even hold public meetings for half a year. That's not dirty tricks, that's just dirty politicians - and now he wants a promotion.