Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Somebody is doing this independently! Check it ou
https://sites.google.com/view/mcpsactivecovidcases/home
This should have been done by MCPS instead of trying to hide the accumulated infection rate in last 10 days.
Anonymous wrote:Somebody is doing this independently! Check it ou
https://sites.google.com/view/mcpsactivecovidcases/home
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Somebody is doing this independently! Check it ou
https://sites.google.com/view/mcpsactivecovidcases/home
This should have been done by MCPS instead of trying to hide the accumulated infection rate in last 10 days.
100%
There's no excuse for the lack of transparency
What difference does it make. Mcps has been clear they will not do anything till the state forces it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Somebody is doing this independently! Check it ou
https://sites.google.com/view/mcpsactivecovidcases/home
This should have been done by MCPS instead of trying to hide the accumulated infection rate in last 10 days.
100%
There's no excuse for the lack of transparency
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Somebody is doing this independently! Check it ou
https://sites.google.com/view/mcpsactivecovidcases/home
This should have been done by MCPS instead of trying to hide the accumulated infection rate in last 10 days.
100%
There's no excuse for the lack of transparency
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Somebody is doing this independently! Check it ou
https://sites.google.com/view/mcpsactivecovidcases/home
This should have been done by MCPS instead of trying to hide the accumulated infection rate in last 10 days.
Anonymous wrote:Somebody is doing this independently! Check it ou
https://sites.google.com/view/mcpsactivecovidcases/home
Anonymous wrote:NP. People in that locked/redirected thread are way off the mark.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1029053.page
"The fact that an entirely arbitrary percentage of a highly-vaxxed, low-risk population is "infected" is irrelevant to reasoned decision-making."
Yeah, so the percentage of people infected (that's a fact, scare quotes are insulting) actually does have bearing on making reasoned decisions. It kind of tells you how fast and how widely the disease is spreading. Weird, right?
Now, it's only one factor, I guess? It is *less* closely correlated to very high rates of death, thanks to vaccinations. But, yeah, monitoring infections tells you how many people are infected-- and infectious! With a disease that still kills people. And at the very bare minimum, renders many of them temporarily unable to work or go to school. A small percentage of an extremely high number is still a lot of deaths. A significant percentage of a extremely high number is a significant disruption to the workforce, etc.
But no, of course infection rates have no place in "reasoned decision-making" about an... infectious disease.
(And, sure, school kids may be at relatively low risk, and MoCo may be highly-vaccinated. But MoCo school kids are not highly-vaccinated.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So are they only aggregating numbers every two weeks?
Or when they feel like it?
Just the one time?
Every day MCPS will make new reporting data in a different format. That way you don't get a consistent picture.
Anonymous wrote:So are they only aggregating numbers every two weeks?
Or when they feel like it?
Just the one time?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yesterday's numbers look VERY suspicious. Schools that were posting numbers in the 20s on Monday are suddenly reporting a single case? Impossible.
you think mcps is in the business of falsifying numbers, seriously?