Anonymous wrote:Once again, please stop posting college transition rankings. You are misleading a lot of people.

Anonymous wrote:Once again, please stop posting college transition rankings. You are misleading a lot of people.

Anonymous wrote:Once again, please stop posting college transition rankings. You are misleading a lot of people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those interested in context, it seems this represents the type of post to which the OP objects, particularly based on the timing of the creation of this thread:

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/1327021.page

I now see how silly it is to inject the college transitions in that thread. Anyway, this poster has stopped posting college transitions.

For those who haven't taken the time to read this earlier topic, the OP sought "comparable schools in selectivity . . . to Wake and W&M." A reply then offered a link to a College Transitions site in which selective college are grouped by rough equivalence in difficulty of admission. People can judge for themselves whether or not the reply was silly.

People should do more of their own factual investigations from resources like the Common Dara Sets and federal data. There is a lot of misinformation on random websites.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those interested in context, it seems this represents the type of post to which the OP objects, particularly based on the timing of the creation of this thread:

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/1327021.page

I now see how silly it is to inject the college transitions in that thread. Anyway, this poster has stopped posting college transitions.

For those who haven't taken the time to read this earlier topic, the OP sought "comparable schools in selectivity . . . to Wake and W&M." A reply then offered a link to a College Transitions site in which selective college are grouped by rough equivalence in difficulty of admission. People can judge for themselves whether or not the reply was silly.

Anonymous wrote:My issue with college transitions is not really the website itself. It’s that a bot keeps posting college transitions and google share links over and over again in this site with no context and little applicability to the situation. When someone just plops a source and makes no point, it’s a struggle to take it seriously.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those interested in context, it seems this represents the type of post to which the OP objects, particularly based on the timing of the creation of this thread:

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/1327021.page

I now see how silly it is to inject the college transitions in that thread. Anyway, this poster has stopped posting college transitions.

Anonymous wrote:College transitions uses Linkedin data for its outcome rankings. These are based on self reported Linkedin profiles, they are not reliable. Please stop the excessive usage of college transitions rankings in your posts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those interested in context, it seems this represents the type of post to which the OP objects, particularly based on the timing of the creation of this thread:

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/1327021.page

I now see how silly it is to inject the college transitions in that thread. Anyway, this poster has stopped posting college transitions.

Anonymous wrote:For those interested in context, it seems this represents the type of post to which the OP objects, particularly based on the timing of the creation of this thread:

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/1327021.page

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those interested in context, it seems this represents the type of post to which the OP objects, particularly based on the timing of the creation of this thread:

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/1327021.page

+1
That poster always shows up to plug a certain school using that site. It's comical.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those interested in context, it seems this represents the type of post to which the OP objects, particularly based on the timing of the creation of this thread:

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/1327021.page

+1
That poster always shows up to plug a certain school using that site. It's comical.

Agree. Clueless and comical.

Self reflection

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those interested in context, it seems this represents the type of post to which the OP objects, particularly based on the timing of the creation of this thread:

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/1327021.page

+1
That poster always shows up to plug a certain school using that site. It's comical.

Agree. Clueless and comical.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue is not everyone uses LinkedIn. I know, for one, that I wouldn't be listed, as a recent grad from Harvard law, in these rankings' datapoints, because LinkedIn serves no purpose in my professional career. Do not use these rankings.

This seems much like saying "I wasn't polled, therefore the survey is invalid." This would represent the case with whichever law school you attended. That said, I'm not even sure where people are seeing College Transitions feeder lists through DCUM.

+1. And I, as another HLS grad, DO use linked In as does every else in my class!